search for: jettisons

Got part 1 - xx of back up working, so figured it's a good time to look for stuff to jettison... casually of course. Like paperwork, documentation, ... it's low on the priority list with GB so cheap these days. Anyway, 42M in /var/spool/up2date. Headers and such. I use only yum after my first month or so of CentOS. Can I dump that and similar non- config stuff? Or does it have some

On 6/9/19 7:00 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > I said that Samba does not support it because we do not produce it and that it does very little that winbind doesn't. I'm not sure I understand how winbind and sssd are even comparable. sssd is sort of a unified replacement for pam_ldap and nscd and can, for example be configured to allow authentication from an AD and an unrelated LDAP

Hello, all. I'm a fairly new maintainer of Gentoo packages for LLVM and clang. I'm trying to improve the way LLVM is built on Gentoo, and that's why I'm wondering which of the build systems of LLVM is supported better. As far as I'm aware, LLVM can be currently built using one of the two build systems: - one built on top of autoconf with custom Makefiles, - the other one

On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 6:46 PM Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > > On May 1, 2015, at 12:31 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > *The atom model is not the best model for some architectures * > > > The atom model is a good fit for the llvm compiler model for all > architectures. There is a one-to-one mapping between llvm::GlobalObject >

Hi I've created a couple of new public yum repos suitable for CentOS 7: ergel (Extra Ruby Gems for Enterprise Linux) repo: https://harbottle.gitlab.io/ergel/7/x86_64/ homepage: https://gitlab.com/harbottle/ergel epmel (Extra Perl Modules for Enterprise Linux) repo: https://harbottle.gitlab.io/epmel/7/x86_64/ homepage: https://gitlab.com/harbottle/epmel The repos are

Hi, I am looking for IE6 to run on Vista - In the URL below, it states that there is a Wine for Windows now - and IE 6 can be installed once you have Wine for Windows. Is this correct info? http://tredosoft.com/IE6_For_Vista_Part_1 I have recently installed Debian on a old Pentium 3 machine, so I may check out Wine on that platform as well. If the hardware can take it. I have I believe 384MB

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1011 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1011.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 614181e7113b22b6fcf47582504f105eac9318a4293bbf7ebaf5a92b34f20d19 resteasy-base-2.3.5-3.el7_0.noarch.rpm

Hello, Is there someody who can explain me the meaning of these sentence. "Sip is philosophically horizontal and H.323/MGCP are vertical" Thank U (if you have some links to share about this protocols, share it :) ) Ignace

Folks, In recent discussions about accepting the Lanai back-end as official (built by default), there was the idea that we should have some official guidelines, if not rules, that all targets must (should?) follow when requesting to be added upstream, and later, to be officially supported. Here's a list of what more or less converged into the thread with my personal bias. Must haves to be

IMO, if we're switching to git, we should just be clear up front that all committers will be expected to switch to git as well -- or at least, if they want to use something else (e.g. mercurial's git bridge/etc), that it's their own problem. It is truly NOT that big an imposition to require the use of git. And knowing how to use git at at least a basic level is an important skill for

...hat type chroot()''s to a "secure" (and I use the term loosely) directory just after it starts up. I''ve modified and started using a tftpd that starts up and then chroots to the directory specified by the first command line argument, or "/var/tftp". Then, it jettisons root privledges in favor of nobody/nogroup and goes on its way. It''s a cute little hack, and it seems to work. But I am convinced that someone must have seen the need and done this before. My extended forays into the web via several search engines have failed to turn up anything relevan...

Hi all, I''m in the throes of the REST conversion and I''m wondering: How important is it to retain backward compatibility? The language will clearly be consistent between the two, but it looks like it''s going to be a heckuva lot more complicated to keep compatibility for all network services (as in, for each of them, I''ll have to write a shell that

I see that samba4 will have it's own LDAP database. How will the support for OpenLDAP be? if anyone knows. Will I have the option to use OpenLDAP still for all the new features so as to be able to use current apps that use OpenLDAP already? If anyone has info regarding this, it would be appreciated. Thanks. Caleb O'Connell

Not only is [Markdown] dead, it's starting to smell really bad. (Apologies to Pike.) It's author appears to have little interest in developing the tool and participating in the community which uses it. I'd like to see the community cooperate toward a specification which addresses the shortcomings and ambiguities of Markdown (even if it need be released under a new name).

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

The Rails ApplicationController (app/controllers/application.rb) serves as an abstract superclass for all other controllers in a Rails application and is a good place to put methods and filters which you want all of your controllers to use. In my case I''m using it to provide methods such as "current_user" and "logged_in?" etc. By default, RSpec

Now that the statepoint changes have landed, I wanted to start a discussion about what's next for GC support in LLVM. I'm going to sketch out a strawman proposal, but I'm not set on any of this. I mostly just want to draw interested parties out of the woodwork. :) Overall Direction: In the short term, my intent is to preserve the functionality of the existing code, but migrate

You've raised an important point here Pete, and while I disagree pretty strongly with it (regardless of whether Lanai makes sense or not), I'm glad that you've surfaced it where we can clearly look at the issue. The idea of "it really should have users outside of just the people who have access to the HW" I think is deeply problematic for the project as a whole. Where does