Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "jettison".
2006 Jul 28
2
RHN Up2date Cruft: can I dump it?
Got part 1 - xx of back up working, so figured it's a good time to look
for stuff to jettison... casually of course. Like paperwork,
documentation, ... it's low on the priority list with GB so cheap these
days.
Anyway, 42M in /var/spool/up2date. Headers and such. I use only yum
after my first month or so of CentOS. Can I dump that and similar non-
config stuff?
Or does it have some po...
2019 Jun 11
1
Samba + sssd
...ven't seen or thought of anything yet.
Anyway, we've been using sssd in a linux-only environment using
NFS/autofs to mount file shares. Now I'm needing to add some Windows
machines to the mix and have installed the complete Samba package (sssd
already uses Samba) on a file server. Jettisoning sssd is not an
option, so hopefully there is a way to get this to work. Right now,
when attempting to mount a share:
net use I: \\krakenhost\emtifs /user:austin\pgoetz
I get a password prompt, but then the authentication fails even though I
can use my AD username to log in to the Samb...
2013 Dec 26
4
[LLVMdev] State of build system support in LLVM
Hello, all.
I'm a fairly new maintainer of Gentoo packages for LLVM and clang. I'm
trying to improve the way LLVM is built on Gentoo, and that's why I'm
wondering which of the build systems of LLVM is supported better.
As far as I'm aware, LLVM can be currently built using one of the two
build systems:
- one built on top of autoconf with custom Makefiles,
- the other one
2015 May 02
4
[LLVMdev] LLD improvement plan
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 6:46 PM Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On May 1, 2015, at 12:31 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:
>
> *The atom model is not the best model for some architectures *
>
>
> The atom model is a good fit for the llvm compiler model for all
> architectures. There is a one-to-one mapping between llvm::GlobalObject
>
2016 Oct 21
1
Announcement: new yum repos
Hi
I've created a couple of new public yum repos suitable for CentOS 7:
ergel (Extra Ruby Gems for Enterprise Linux)
repo: https://harbottle.gitlab.io/ergel/7/x86_64/
homepage: https://gitlab.com/harbottle/ergel
epmel (Extra Perl Modules for Enterprise Linux)
repo: https://harbottle.gitlab.io/epmel/7/x86_64/
homepage: https://gitlab.com/harbottle/epmel
The repos are
2009 Feb 24
2
Wine for Windows Vista?
Hi,
I am looking for IE6 to run on Vista - In the URL below, it states that
there is a Wine for Windows now - and IE 6 can be installed once you have Wine for Windows.
Is this correct info?
http://tredosoft.com/IE6_For_Vista_Part_1
I have recently installed Debian on a old Pentium 3 machine, so I may check out Wine on that platform as well.
If the hardware can take it.
I have I believe 384MB
2014 Aug 06
0
CESA-2014:1011 Moderate CentOS 7 resteasy-base Security Update
...3e3bc14bd3f778895a2e498be1c56ffe6008ed918e370263407152 resteasy-base-jaxrs-all-2.3.5-3.el7_0.noarch.rpm
89eeef44c2e4e0b35dc10a5398372a16796d91f0bf5bdd2783b81487feebe596 resteasy-base-jaxrs-api-2.3.5-3.el7_0.noarch.rpm
e62ee9a1f7d5dd61bd0c0d1aff9d829acf4afc93978d2457cefc3cec43aa77a4 resteasy-base-jettison-provider-2.3.5-3.el7_0.noarch.rpm
2224cd51ee821f60f12a0a21c5fd096eb6e3449fcde25799e22172b5bfe2a696 resteasy-base-providers-pom-2.3.5-3.el7_0.noarch.rpm
9c1b745a15baf75c07744d4e30d12b3513201223426cc410b25b42899a585779 resteasy-base-tjws-2.3.5-3.el7_0.noarch.rpm
Source:
9e69a19d1f0a995a670be0d3906...
2004 Apr 29
1
Need an explanation about different protocols
Hello,
Is there someody who can explain me the meaning of these sentence.
"Sip is philosophically horizontal and H.323/MGCP are vertical"
Thank U
(if you have some links to share about this protocols, share it :) )
Ignace
2016 Jul 25
6
Target Acceptance Policy
...we should avoid 1, 2 and 3 for any reasons, or we'll be
shooting ourselves in th foot.
4 is only applicable to actual executing targets, and may clash with
existing targets like GPUs, BPF, etc. While I'd *really* like to have
some execution model for GPUs, I'm not prepared to recommend
jettisoning their back-ends without it. :)
5 states "6 months" as a ball-park. I'm not too fixed on that, and I
welcome ideas if anyone feels strongly about time taken. I think it
needs to give us enough time to assess the *other* points (es.
community, tests, validation, response).
6 I thin...
2016 Jun 01
2
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?
IMO, if we're switching to git, we should just be clear up front that all
committers will be expected to switch to git as well -- or at least, if
they want to use something else (e.g. mercurial's git bridge/etc), that
it's their own problem.
It is truly NOT that big an imposition to require the use of git. And
knowing how to use git at at least a basic level is an important skill for
1997 Mar 22
2
"Secure" tftpd source for Linux?
...hat type chroot()''s to a "secure" (and I use the term loosely) directory
just after it starts up.
I''ve modified and started using a tftpd that starts up and then chroots
to the directory specified by the first command line argument, or "/var/tftp".
Then, it jettisons root privledges in favor of nobody/nogroup and goes on
its way.
It''s a cute little hack, and it seems to work. But I am convinced that
someone must have seen the need and done this before. My extended forays
into the web via several search engines have failed to turn up anything
releva...
2007 Sep 04
16
REST/XMLRPC backward compatibility?
Hi all,
I''m in the throes of the REST conversion and I''m wondering: How
important is it to retain backward compatibility? The language will
clearly be consistent between the two, but it looks like it''s going
to be a heckuva lot more complicated to keep compatibility for all
network services (as in, for each of them, I''ll have to write a shell
that
2005 May 20
3
samba4 openldap
I see that samba4 will have it's own LDAP database. How will the support
for OpenLDAP be? if anyone knows. Will I have the option to use OpenLDAP
still for all the new features so as to be able to use current apps that
use OpenLDAP already? If anyone has info regarding this, it would be
appreciated. Thanks.
Caleb O'Connell
2010 Mar 05
11
Markdown development
Not only is [Markdown] dead, it's starting to smell really bad. (Apologies to Pike.)
It's author appears to have little interest in developing the tool and participating in the community which uses it.
I'd like to see the community cooperate toward a specification which addresses the shortcomings and ambiguities of Markdown (even if it need be released under a new name).
2014 Aug 07
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 114, Issue 4
...3e3bc14bd3f778895a2e498be1c56ffe6008ed918e370263407152 resteasy-base-jaxrs-all-2.3.5-3.el7_0.noarch.rpm
89eeef44c2e4e0b35dc10a5398372a16796d91f0bf5bdd2783b81487feebe596 resteasy-base-jaxrs-api-2.3.5-3.el7_0.noarch.rpm
e62ee9a1f7d5dd61bd0c0d1aff9d829acf4afc93978d2457cefc3cec43aa77a4 resteasy-base-jettison-provider-2.3.5-3.el7_0.noarch.rpm
2224cd51ee821f60f12a0a21c5fd096eb6e3449fcde25799e22172b5bfe2a696 resteasy-base-providers-pom-2.3.5-3.el7_0.noarch.rpm
9c1b745a15baf75c07744d4e30d12b3513201223426cc410b25b42899a585779 resteasy-base-tjws-2.3.5-3.el7_0.noarch.rpm
Source:
9e69a19d1f0a995a670be0d3906...
2007 May 24
25
Specs for ApplicationController, where to put them?
The Rails ApplicationController (app/controllers/application.rb)
serves as an abstract superclass for all other controllers in a Rails
application and is a good place to put methods and filters which you
want all of your controllers to use. In my case I''m using it to
provide methods such as "current_user" and "logged_in?" etc.
By default, RSpec
2014 Dec 05
9
[LLVMdev] Future plans for GC in LLVM
Now that the statepoint changes have landed, I wanted to start a
discussion about what's next for GC support in LLVM. I'm going to
sketch out a strawman proposal, but I'm not set on any of this. I
mostly just want to draw interested parties out of the woodwork. :)
Overall Direction:
In the short term, my intent is to preserve the functionality of the
existing code, but migrate
2016 Feb 10
9
[RFC] Lanai backend
You've raised an important point here Pete, and while I disagree pretty
strongly with it (regardless of whether Lanai makes sense or not), I'm glad
that you've surfaced it where we can clearly look at the issue.
The idea of "it really should have users outside of just the people who
have access to the HW" I think is deeply problematic for the project as a
whole. Where does