search for: jerome

Full_Name: Jerome Asselin Version: 1.6.2 OS: RedHat Linux 7.2 Submission from: (NULL) (142.103.173.179) Should be an easy fix... Consider the examble below: plot(0,0) legend(0,0,c("Hello!","Hi!"),pch=1:2,lty=1:2,trace=T) It gives the following trace: > plot(0,0) > legend(0,0,c("...

...ame from the line below: diag(mig.mat[1:(np-side),(side+1):np])<-mig/4 the diag part is ok, but it seems that I cannot assign values to this vector. I would be very glad for any help on this, or on pointers on how to construct Matrices. As I am not on the list, please could you answer to jerome.goudet at unil.ch? Many thanks in advance. R 2.4.0 Windows XP Matrix package version 0.9975-3 -- J?r?me GOUDET Dep. Ecology & Evolution Biophore, UNIL-Sorge UNIL-CH-1015 Lausanne Switzerland http://www.unil.ch/dee http://www.unil.ch/popgen Tel: +41 21 692 42 42 Fax: +41 21 692 42 65 S...

...t = Dossier commun DSVI path = /d2/dsvi valid users = +dsvi force group = dsvi read only = No create mask = 0774 directory mask = 0775 force directory mode = 0774 User defined in Unix as follow (Linux id command, from LDAP info) : # id jerome uid=1000(jerome) gid=513(domusers) groups=513(domusers),550(prtadmin),103(dsvi),102(susers) In LDAP : $ ldapsearch -h localhost -D 'cn=Manager,dc=domain,dc=com' -x '(uid=jerome)' -W -LLL Enter LDAP Password: ******** dn: uid=jerome, ou=INFORMATIQUE, ou=Paris, ou=People, dc=domain...

Hi, I''ve some btrfs fs which are encrypted with loopaes. I decrypt them in a script during bootup. Now I want to determine if the decrypted fs is a btrfs fs. If not I missspelled the password and I can handle that error in my script. Thanks for any help! Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to

Full_Name: Jerome Asselin Version: 1.6.1 OS: RedHat Linux 7.2 Submission from: (NULL) (142.103.173.179) Hello, I get a segmentation fault when I run the following code. I wouldn't expect meaningful results because my response variable contains only missing values. However, I would expect something like a reg...

Dear R users, I am interested in uni- bi- multimodality tests, for analysing reaction times data. I was lead to Hartigan's dip test (Ann. Statistics, 13, 1985, pp. 70-84, Applied Statistics, 34, 1985, 320-325). Not being a programmer I am unable to translate the Fortran code given in ref. 2 into a R function. I'd be glad to learn that someone already did it, or has devised a better

When trying to browser users or groups on the server I see these messages in the log file. [2004/09/02 10:40:15, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_search_suffix(1101) smbldap_search_suffix: Problem during the LDAP search: (Size limit exceeded) [2004/09/02 10:40:15, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_setsampwent(1173) ldapsam_setsampwent: LDAP search failed: Size limit exceeded We are unable to browse

...e? It does not have to be fancy!! I have never worked with a package where the legend was not automatic. ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Re: [R] legend() with option adj=1 Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 09:19:11 +0200 From: Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.uni-dortmund.de> To: Jerome Asselin <jerome at hivnet.ubc.ca> Cc: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch Jerome Asselin wrote: > Hi there, > > I want to justify to right the text of my legend. Consider this short > reproducable example. > > x <- 1:5 > y1 <- 1/x > y2 <- 2/x > plot(rep(x,2),c(y1,...

...signer who uses Dreamweaver for HTML. When he views the .rhtml files in Dreamweaver, he currently has to rename the .rhtml suffix to .html in order to work with it. Does anyone know if there is a setting for Dreamweaver to properly view the .rhtml files without having to rename them? Thanks, Jerome -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Full_Name: Jerome Asselin Version: 1.7.1 OS: Red Hat Linux 7.2 Submission from: (NULL) (24.77.125.119) Setting the parameter na.action=na.omit should remove incomplete records in princomp. However this does not seem to work as expected. See example below. Sincerely, Jerome Asselin data(USArrests) princomp(USAr...

Hi, we have tested Samba 3.0.0 and 3.0.1 with LDAP-Support (--with-ldap) on Solaris 8 and it worked fine. The machine authenticates against an OpenLDAP server. Patch 108993-23 is applied and we use native Sun LDAP client modules. On Solaris 9 we ran into problems with secondary groups. Users cannot access files if the rights are based on a secondary group and if this information is stored on

Full_Name: Jerome Asselin Version: 1.8.0 OS: RedHat Linux 7.2 Submission from: (NULL) (142.103.177.13) I would not expect a segmentation fault; perhaps an error message. > .Call("log") Segmentation fault This is always reproducable for me. Sincerely, Jerome Asselin

...it seems like survreg() cannot deal with lower bounds of zero, despite the fact that plnorm(0)==0 and pnorm(-Inf)==0 are well defined. Below is a short example to reproduce the problem. Does anyone know why survreg() must behave that way? Is there an alternate solution to this problem? Sincerely, Jerome Asselin library(survival) data(ovarian) newovarian <- ovarian newovarian$lower59 <- newovarian$futime-59 newovarian$time59 <- Surv(newovarian$lower59,newovarian$futime, event=rep(3,nrow(newovarian)),type="interval") survreg(time59~ecog.ps+rx,data=newovarian,dist="logno...

R version: 1.7.1 OS: Red Hat Linux 7.2 In this example, I would expect an error for the overly long variable name. This is always reproducable for me. > formula(paste("y~",paste(rep("x",50000),collapse=""))) Segmentation fault Sincerely, Jerome Asselin -- Jerome Asselin (Jérôme), Statistical Analyst British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS St. Paul's Hospital, 608 - 1081 Burrard Street Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA V6Z 1Y6 Email: jerome@hivnet.ubc.ca Phone: 604 806-9112 Fax: 604 806-9044

...g debug info, I added some debug traces to llvm-objdump and it seems the following symbol is the culprit: __ThumbV7PILongThunk_<my_func> Is this expected behavior? How to fix it? LLVM version is llvmorg-11-init-12683-g54b3f91d205 but AFAICT anything above 10.0 behaves the same. Thanks, -- Jerome

...tatic void __attribute__((constructor)) so_init_fn(void) { val = 1; } I would expect the main program to return 2, not 1. Last thing, if I define "val" as volatile, the programs behaves as expected. Are we in "unspecified, just don't do this" territory here? Thanks, -- Jerome > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 10:12 AM Jerome Forissier via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I think that Clang erroneously discards a function annotated with >> __attribute__((constructor)) when flags -Os -fno-common are give...

...to this (and how clang 10.0.0 behaves). ________________________________ From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on behalf of Sjoerd Meijer via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Sent: 01 June 2020 16:32 To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; Jerome Forissier <jerome at forissier.org> Cc: op-tee at lists.trustedfirmware.org <op-tee at lists.trustedfirmware.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Aarch64: unaligned access despite -mstrict-align Hi Jerome, > Note the 'ldr x9, [x0]'. At this point there is no guarantee that x0 is a...

...quot;.note.GNU-stack","", at progbits .addrsig ---8<-------8<-------8<-------8<-------8<-------8<-------8<------- Note the 'ldr x9, [x0]'. At this point there is no guarantee that x0 is a multiple of 8, so why is Clang generating this code? Thanks, -- Jerome

On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:33:06PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote: > So nor HMM nor driver should dereference the struct page (i do not > think any iommu driver would either), Er, they do technically deref the struct page: nouveau_dmem_convert_pfn(struct nouveau_drm *drm, struct hmm_range *range) struct page *page; page = hmm_pfn_to_...

On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 10:43:12PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 10:40:53PM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 10:16:00PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 09:55:39PM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 09:21:03PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Mar 07,...