Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "ivandi".
Did you mean:
andi
2018 Jun 07
2
Domain Member Computer not showing in ADUC
...a more current version of Samba and see if that helps. The version
I'm using is the most recent available for my Slackware distribution. The next version in the
pending Slackware release is 4.8.2. I may try that first. Actually, I may try your package as
it is targeted to Slackware. I am using Ivandi's PAM on the Linux domain members.
I had no problems with the initial 4.1 version and Group Policies when installed back in 2014.
Still had no problem in 2016 with Samba 4.2.12 when the most recent user was added. That user
was able to log on the first time and get her redirected desktop. We...
2018 Jun 06
2
Domain Member Computer not showing in ADUC
I am running Samba 4.4.16 on Slackware64 14.2. I have a domain member Windows 7 workstation. I
upgraded the hardware on this computer a couple of weeks ago. I deleted the computer from
the domain, the re-joined after finishing the upgrade.
This computer show in the list with 'samba-tool group listmembers "Domain Computers"', but does
not show up in ADUC > Computers. I've
2004 Mar 31
0
(no subject)
I made some tests to see how ext3 reiserfs 3.6 and jfs survive disk errors.
The test is simple:
format a partition, copy the kernel source, unmount and and do ?dd
if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdd bs=512 count=100000 seek=30000? to simulate a
disk surface damage and then run fsck.
seek=30000 ? this must be the second half of journal in reiserfs and ext3,
for jfs I don't know
Result:
jfs:
----
total
2002 Mar 23
1
bad i_blocks count when FS full
I tried it on loop.
1. mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/test -t ext3
2. cp files to 100% full
3. umount /mnt/test
4. fsck.ext3 -f /dev/loop0
Inode xxxxx, i_blocks is xxx, should be yyy. Fix?
2004 Mar 06
1
Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3
I don't think that XFS is a desktop filesystem at all.
This is from XFS FAQ:
qoute
------------
Q: Why do I see binary NULLS in some files after recovery when I
unplugged the power?
If it hurts don't do that!
* NOTE: XFS 1.1 and kernels => 2.4.18 has the asynchronous delete path
which means that you will see a lot less of these problems. If you still
have not updated to the 1.1
2004 Mar 31
2
tests to see how ext3 reiserfs 3.6 and jfs survive disk errors.
I made some tests to see how ext3 reiserfs 3.6 and jfs survive disk
errors.
The test is simple:
format a partition, copy the kernel source, unmount and and do ?dd
if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdd bs=512 count=100000 seek=30000? to simulate a
disk surface damage and then run fsck.
seek=30000 ? this must be the second half of journal in reiserfs and
ext3, for jfs I don't know
Result:
jfs:
----
total