search for: itle

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 66 matches for "itle".

Did you mean: idle
2017 Jul 19
1
kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 (and el6)
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Are the testing kernels (kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 and kernel-4.9.37-29.el6, > with the one config file change) working for everyone: > > (turn off: CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM) Hello. Maybe it's not the most appropriate thread or time, but I have been signalling it before: 4.9.* kernels do not work well for me any more (and for other people
2006 Jul 30
2
NIST StRD linear regression
NIST maintains a repository of Statistical Reference Datasets at http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/strd/. I have been working through the datasets to compare R's results to their references with the hope that if all works well, this could become a validation package. All the linear regression datasets give results with some degree of accuracy except one. The NIST model includes 11 parameters,
2017 May 22
1
xen-4.6.3-14.el6.x86_64
Hello, xen-4.6.3-14.el6.x86_64 is in testing since 5th of May. Isn't it production ready yet? It fixes 3 XSAs... Regards, -- Piotr Gackiewicz Intertele S.A. - operator system?w ITL.PL i DOMENY.ITL.PL al. T. Rejtana 10, 35-310 Rzesz?w TEL: +48 17 8507580, FAX: +48 17 8520275 http://www.itl.pl - niezawodne us?ugi hostingowe http://domeny.itl.pl - tanie domeny internetowe
2017 Jul 28
1
New xen-4.6.6 rpms for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/18/2017 04:48 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> There are new xen-4.6.6 rpms for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 in the testing >> repository on buildlogs.centos.org. >> >> Can we please get some testing of these RPMs and feedback to this list. >> > > > Any testing or feedback on these 4.6.6 rpms? It would suck if I was
2012 May 04
3
read-in, error???
Dear Users! I encountered with some problem in data reading while I challenged R (and me too) in a validation point of view. In this issue, I tried to utilize some reference datasets ( http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/strd/index.html). And the result departed a bit from my expectations. This dataset dedicated to challenge cancellation and accumulation errors (case SmLs07), that's why this
2017 Jul 20
2
kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 (and el6)
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/19/2017 09:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: >>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >>>> Are the testing kernels (kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 and kernel-4.9.37-29.el6, >>>> with the one config file change) working for everyone: >>>>
2017 Jul 18
4
New xen-4.6.6 rpms for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7
There are new xen-4.6.6 rpms for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 in the testing repository on buildlogs.centos.org. Can we please get some testing of these RPMs and feedback to this list. Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL:
2008 Nov 03
4
cleaning user properties
I have a little question about user properties, I have two filesystems: rpool/export/home/luca and rpool/export/home/luca/src in this two I have one user property, setted with: zfs set net.morettoni:test=xyz rpool/export/home/luca zfs set net.morettoni:test=123 rpool/export/home/luca/src now I need to *clear* (remove) the property from rpool/export/home/luca/src filesystem, but if I use the
2017 Jul 21
3
kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 (and el6)
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> > > I will happily create a test kernel with SLAB .. what is your config > file diff? I have just choosed SLAB allocator in menuconfig. It has implied several other internal configurations changes. Overall differencess (config file patch) is in attachment. But my considerations about compiled in PATA etc., instead of modules, remain
2012 Feb 02
9
Modelo senoidal de datos temporales de radiación y prueba de Thom
Hola a todos: Estoy intentado realizar un modelo senoidal de unos datos de radiación solar con el fin de afrontar el relleno de la serie y aplicar la prueba de Thom para verificar su homogeneidad [0]. De momento me encuentro con los siguientes problemas: 1- ¿Existe la prueba de Thom en R? ¿O debo crearme mi propia función? 2- Para la realización del modelo senoidal estoy siguiendo los pasos
2007 Jul 04
2
probabilty plot
Hi all, I am a freshman of R,but I am interested in it! Those days,I am learning pages on NIST,with url http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/probplot.htm, I am meeting a problem about probability plot and I don't know how to plot a data set with R. Could somebody tell me the answer,and a example is the best! I will look forward to your answer. Thank you very much.
2012 Jun 25
2
Fractional Factorial - Wrong values using lm-function
Hello. I'm a new user of R, and I have a question regarding the use of aov and lm-functions. I'm doing a fractional factorial experiment at our production site, and I need to familiarize myself with the analysis before I conduct the experiment. I've been working my way through the examples provided at http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/pri/section4/pri472.htm
2005 Mar 23
2
R accuracy
Hello, I am trying to test the precision of R on datasets from The Statistical Reference Datasets Project http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/strd/index.html and I don't manage to understand how R is storing its results. For example, I calculate a mean on the michelso dataset (100 values) and find: > m=mean(michel) > m V1 299.8524 > print(m,digits=15) V1 299.8524
2017 Apr 20
0
Testing kernel crash: 4.9.23-26.el6.x86_64
Hello CentOS Xen Heroes, Yesterday, I have installed testing kernel 4.9.23-26.el6.x86_64 from virt-xen-testing repo. It crashed today morning. Hardware is a pretty ancient, testing machine (CO6 PV guests only), but had no problems yet. It was stable on 4.9*, including testing 4.9.15-22.el6.x86_64 Console output: [59826.069427] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP [59826.069463] Modules
2017 Jul 20
4
kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 (and el6)
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017, Kevin Stange wrote: > On 07/20/2017 05:31 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >>> On 07/19/2017 09:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Are the
2004 Apr 02
3
Single Factor Anova
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello all - As I progress in R I am trying to automate functions I would have normally farmed out to Excel, SPSS or Statistica. Single factor anova is one of them. For example, a dataset from NIST StRD (http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/strd/anova/AtmWtAg.html) has two groups: 1 2 107.8681568 107.8681079 107.8681465 107.8681344
2006 Sep 26
4
Tripp-Lite OMNI650LCD
Hello all; I am new to this list. Recently we have been getting these cheap new Tripp-Lite "LCD" style UPS'es around here, and I was surprised to find the lack of Linux support. The model name is OMNI650LCD. Anyway, I tried the tripplite_usb driver and got a message instructing me to contact this mailing list. I might try to fix the problem myself, if I was more familiar with the
2008 Apr 17
2
Design and analysis of mixture experiments
Hi, I'm interested in experimental design and data analysis on mixtures, like cake recipes where the sum of the components is fixed; e.g. <http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/pri/section5/pri54.htm>. I can't believe that R doesn't have facilities to design and analyse such experiments, but I haven't been able to find them (I have looked quite hard!). Can anyone point
2017 Jul 19
2
kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 (and el6)
On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> Are the testing kernels (kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 and kernel-4.9.37-29.el6, >> with the one config file change) working for everyone: >> >> (turn off: CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM) > > Hello. > Maybe it's not the most appropriate thread or time, but I have been >
2007 May 31
3
Problem with Weighted Variance in Hmisc
The function wtd.var(x,w) in Hmisc calculates the weighted variance of x where w are the weights. It appears to me that wtd.var(x,w) = var(x) if all of the weights are equal, but this does not appear to be the case. Can someone point out to me where I am going wrong here? Thanks. Tom La Bone [[alternative HTML version deleted]]