search for: iteresting

hi, i am new to Roby on Rails. we have a project on this. i have very much satisfied with development with this environment. it is very iteresting. but i have a problem with insertion. my problem is: i have to insert values into two tables at one submit. i am using mysql as db. i have created two tables which has one to one reelation ship. once i enter name and email address and role. name and emailaddress has to be inserted in users tabl...

Hi, I allow only TLS/SSL connection to dovecot. The managesieve doesn't work with TLS but it works without it. gladiac at magrathea:~> gnutls-cli -p 2000 -s --insecure -V milliways.cynapses.org Resolving 'milliways.cynapses.org'... Connecting to '213.239.217.124:2000'... - Simple Client Mode: - Received[194]: "IMPLEMENTATION" "dovecot"

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > TCP is the kernel's responsibility. I guess that these values get > copied into each TCB from the copy managed via proc at connection > start time, but never updated afterwards. > This had to happen but the question is why is it possible to increase a timeout but not to decrease it. --

Hi list, I'm performing a series of confirmatory factor analysis on different groupings of items from data collected with questionnaires. There are some missing values. For those sets with no missing values I call factanal(datamatrix,factors=n) where datamatrix is a table of all observations for the items under investigation. This call fails when there are missing values. help(factanal)

...passes twice on the same loops, and we even check for validity of previously auto-vectorized loops! This is already a big waste, and if there was a way to avoid that, we could use the saved time for more complex (maybe iterative, speculative) analysis without increasing the compilation time. > Iteresting. This is a bug. Since we moved the loop vectorizer out of the scc-module pass manager we should only run once on every new loop. The vectorized loop is a new loop so runOnLoop will probably be called again. But the Hint we put in the IR should prevent us from analyzing such loops. I think what you...

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 5:54 PM, via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Problem > ------- > > Instrumentation for PGO and frontend-based coverage places a large amount > of > data in object files, even though the majority of this data is not needed > at > run-time. All the data is needlessly duplicated while generating archives, > and > again while

Problem ------- Instrumentation for PGO and frontend-based coverage places a large amount of data in object files, even though the majority of this data is not needed at run-time. All the data is needlessly duplicated while generating archives, and again while linking. PGO name data is written out into raw profiles by instrumented programs, slowing down the training and code coverage workflows.