Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "iterablescop".
Did you mean:
iterablescope
2011 Oct 16
2
[LLVMdev] Static destructor problem with recent HEAD
...lTable (this=0x1016e4888)
at SymbolTable.h:34
#7 0x00000001000aea45 in tart::OrderedSymbolTable::~OrderedSymbolTable
(this=0x1016e4888) at SymbolTable.h:74
#8 0x00000001000aea15 in tart::OrderedSymbolTable::~OrderedSymbolTable
(this=0x1016e4888) at SymbolTable.h:74
#9 0x00000001000ae809 in tart::IterableScope::~IterableScope
(this=0x1016e4880) at Scope.h:76
#10 0x00000001001e22d5 in tart::IterableScope::~IterableScope
(this=0x1016e4880) at Scope.h:76
#11 0x00000001001e2267 in tart::FunctionDefn::~FunctionDefn
(this=0x1016e4710) at FunctionDefn.h:103
#12 0x00000001000cf821 in ~IntegerBinOpFunction (this...
2011 Oct 16
0
[LLVMdev] Static destructor problem with recent HEAD
...at SymbolTable.h:34
> #7 0x00000001000aea45 in tart::OrderedSymbolTable::~OrderedSymbolTable
> (this=0x1016e4888) at SymbolTable.h:74
> #8 0x00000001000aea15 in tart::OrderedSymbolTable::~OrderedSymbolTable
> (this=0x1016e4888) at SymbolTable.h:74
> #9 0x00000001000ae809 in tart::IterableScope::~IterableScope
> (this=0x1016e4880) at Scope.h:76
> #10 0x00000001001e22d5 in tart::IterableScope::~IterableScope
> (this=0x1016e4880) at Scope.h:76
> #11 0x00000001001e2267 in tart::FunctionDefn::~FunctionDefn
> (this=0x1016e4710) at FunctionDefn.h:103
> #12 0x00000001000cf821...
2011 Oct 16
0
[LLVMdev] Static destructor problem with recent HEAD
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote:
> I recently updated my version of LLVM from revision 140108 to 142082, and
> several things broke, most of which were easily fixed. However, I'm now
> getting a "pure virtual method called" exception (__cxa_pure_virtual) which
> I wasn't getting before. This is happening in the destructor of
2011 Oct 16
2
[LLVMdev] Static destructor problem with recent HEAD
I recently updated my version of LLVM from revision 140108 to 142082, and
several things broke, most of which were easily fixed. However, I'm now
getting a "pure virtual method called" exception (__cxa_pure_virtual) which
I wasn't getting before. This is happening in the destructor of a
statically-initialized object. (More precisely, it's blowing up in a
BumpPtrAllocator,