search for: iterablescope

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "iterablescope".

2011 Oct 16
2
[LLVMdev] Static destructor problem with recent HEAD
...lTable (this=0x1016e4888) at SymbolTable.h:34 #7 0x00000001000aea45 in tart::OrderedSymbolTable::~OrderedSymbolTable (this=0x1016e4888) at SymbolTable.h:74 #8 0x00000001000aea15 in tart::OrderedSymbolTable::~OrderedSymbolTable (this=0x1016e4888) at SymbolTable.h:74 #9 0x00000001000ae809 in tart::IterableScope::~IterableScope (this=0x1016e4880) at Scope.h:76 #10 0x00000001001e22d5 in tart::IterableScope::~IterableScope (this=0x1016e4880) at Scope.h:76 #11 0x00000001001e2267 in tart::FunctionDefn::~FunctionDefn (this=0x1016e4710) at FunctionDefn.h:103 #12 0x00000001000cf821 in ~IntegerBinOpFunction (this=...
2011 Oct 16
0
[LLVMdev] Static destructor problem with recent HEAD
...at SymbolTable.h:34 > #7 0x00000001000aea45 in tart::OrderedSymbolTable::~OrderedSymbolTable > (this=0x1016e4888) at SymbolTable.h:74 > #8 0x00000001000aea15 in tart::OrderedSymbolTable::~OrderedSymbolTable > (this=0x1016e4888) at SymbolTable.h:74 > #9 0x00000001000ae809 in tart::IterableScope::~IterableScope > (this=0x1016e4880) at Scope.h:76 > #10 0x00000001001e22d5 in tart::IterableScope::~IterableScope > (this=0x1016e4880) at Scope.h:76 > #11 0x00000001001e2267 in tart::FunctionDefn::~FunctionDefn > (this=0x1016e4710) at FunctionDefn.h:103 > #12 0x00000001000cf821 i...
2011 Oct 16
0
[LLVMdev] Static destructor problem with recent HEAD
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > I recently updated my version of LLVM from revision 140108 to 142082, and > several things broke, most of which were easily fixed. However, I'm now > getting a "pure virtual method called" exception (__cxa_pure_virtual) which > I wasn't getting before. This is happening in the destructor of
2011 Oct 16
2
[LLVMdev] Static destructor problem with recent HEAD
I recently updated my version of LLVM from revision 140108 to 142082, and several things broke, most of which were easily fixed. However, I'm now getting a "pure virtual method called" exception (__cxa_pure_virtual) which I wasn't getting before. This is happening in the destructor of a statically-initialized object. (More precisely, it's blowing up in a BumpPtrAllocator,