search for: itaniums

I always assumed Wine wasnt available on ia64 (note not x64), it certainly hasnt been in the last few Ubuntu ia64 releases when I checked. However Ive read a couple of posts and articles (some dating years back- http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-ivit.html) of people running it so I tried to compile. I can get it to ./configure, but make immediately dumps me to:

Hi Guys, I hope this is the correct mailing list for this question. I have a dual 1.6 Ghz Itanium with 4 Gb of memory. Yes, a lot of power for Asterisk. I am running SuSE Enterprise Server with the 2.6.5-7.97-default kernel. I have just started to look into Asterisk and I am in the building stage. Now building something on Itanium is almost always a bit of a challange. This is unfortunately

Hello, I'd like to introduce myself, my company, and our upcoming use of LLVM. My name is John Reagan. I've been working on compilers and assemblers since 1983 (yes, 31 years). Most of that time was spent on compilers for VAX/VMS (later renamed to OpenVMS), then OpenVMS on Alpha, and OpenVMS on Itanium. I've also worked with the HP NonStop platform and was directly involved

On Jul 16, 2009, at 9:49 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >> For us to keep IA64 around (and for it to be minimally useful for >> your >> work!), I think that the backend should pass most of the simple >> programs in MultiSource/Benchmarks for example. It does *not* need >> to >> produce amazingly fast code, but the code needs to work. I don't >>

Your PxeLinux is really a good product and contains really good features (i.e memdisk). But PxeLinux is a very low level program, contains assembly code and seems to no be portable to Itanium architectures. Does a version of PxeLinux planned for Itanium architecture ? PS:On my configuration, option pxelinux.reboottime (code 211) you give in your documentation removes my "default router"

> On Feb 2, 2015, at 6:04 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > I actually like the unified intrinsic approach here. The backend already has to know things about the personality function. Until recently we would assume that the personality function wants an Itanium LSDA, for example, and dump that out into a target-specific section. Now on Windows we look at the personality

I am trying to compile R-1.6.1 on an itanium. using either gcc 2.96 or gcc 3.0.4 nad either the supplied Redhat blas libs or the supplied code (ie wiht the --no-blas option) I get this error. Has anyone who has compiled R for the itanium advise me on the compilers versions and flags that they used? thanks bye rob gcc -shared -L/usr/local/lib -o lapack.so Lapack.lo

On Jul 16, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > BTW: I don't run Linux at all, so no Linux/ia64 support. > I can see how that could be a problem for people. > > Anyway: my case is a weak one and I would understand if the > target get axed without considering my email/request... Hi Marcel, There are two levels of problems with the IA64 backend. On the first

We are trying out lld ELF on windows. It works great, but a big difference from running it on linux is that it cannot demangle c++ names since there is no itanium demangler available on windows. We have an implementation in libcxxabi/src/cxa_demangle.cpp. I see that there was some discussion about having a version of that in lib/Support, but I don't think a patch was ever posted. So, some

On Jul 16, 2009, at 5:51 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Jul 16, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > >> >> BTW: I don't run Linux at all, so no Linux/ia64 support. >> I can see how that could be a problem for people. >> >> Anyway: my case is a weak one and I would understand if the >> target get axed without considering my email/request...

Red Hat is pleased to announce the availability of Update 2 for the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 family of products, including: - Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 4 for x86, AMD64/EM64T, Itanium, POWER, S/390 and zSeries - Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES 4 for x86, AMD64/EM64T, Itanium - Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS 4 for x86, AMD64/EM64T, Itanium - Red Hat Desktop 4 for x86 and AMD64/EM64T Craig

Can you point out to me where in the VMKit code I should be looking? I spent some additional time reading the docs, and I have some specific questions: 1) I'm trying to figure out the relationship between the __cxa_throw function, and the _Unwind_RaiseException function mentioned in the ABI doc. My guess is that _Unwind_RaiseException is the language-neutral implementation of stack unwinding,

Should I contact the local admin on this? [25/294] Linking CXX executable bin/llvm-itanium-demangle-fuzzer FAILED: bin/llvm-itanium-demangle-fuzzer : && /home/usr4/c74014i/opt/clang/current/bin/clang++ -fPIC -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time -Werror=unguarded-availability-new -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-field-initializers

Dear All, I am new in Itanium server Installation and I have installed all the CentOS4.4 ia64 CDs and I have try to install clustersuite packages and i am getting the following error messages like error: %post(package name here) scriptlet failed, exit status 255 and error: %pre(package name here) scriptlet failed, exit status 255 problem Cluster Suite RPMS are ccs-1.0.7-0.i686.rpm

Hi, I am having some difficulties building llvm on Itanium. My procedure for building LLVM is: cd /liberty/llvm.ia64/llvm-2.1 ./configure make ENABLE_OPTIZED=1 cd /liberty/llvm.ia64/obj /liberty/llvm.ia64/llvm-gcc4.2-2.1.source/configure --prefix=/liberty/llvm.ia64/install --enable-llvm=/liberty/llvm.ia64/llvm-2.1/ --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-shared The build of llvm seems to

On 6/21/17 5:42 PM, Rui Ueyama wrote: > I'm very interested in your work because I've just started writing a > demangler for the Microsoft mangling scheme. What I found in the > current Itanium demangler is the same as you -- it looks like it > allocates too much memory during parsing and concatenates std::strings > too often. I could see there's a (probably big)

Does anyone know if Xen is currently supporting Itanium on 64 Bit!? Thomas Diederich ************************************************** * Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co.KG * A Informationsverarbeitung / Diplomant Systemtechnik * * Mail: diederit@ing.boehringer-Ingelheim.com <mailto:diederit@ing.boehringer-Ingelheim.com> * Phone: +49 (0)6132/77-98151

For those interested in reading on Vanderpool Technology. Intel(r) Vanderpool Technology Preliminary Specification for IA-32 and Intel(r) Itanium(r) Processors are at: www.intel.com/technology/vt. Thanks Sunil _______________________________________________ Core Software Division, Software & Solutions Group Off: (408) 765-5272; Cell (408) 838-8749; Fax (408) 653-5330

Hi Talin, > 1) I'm trying to figure out the relationship between the __cxa_throw > function, and the _Unwind_RaiseException function mentioned in the ABI doc. > My guess is that _Unwind_RaiseException is the language-neutral > implementation of stack unwinding, and __cxa_throw is the C++ exception > semantics that are implemented on top of it. If that is the case, should I >

Hi, I've figured out a little more. #if defined DBX_DEBUGGING_INFO || XCOFF_DEBUGGING_INFO guards the declaration of type_queue, however, neither is defined on Intanium. In gt-dbxout.h type_queue's uses are unguarded and thus are undefined on Itanium. When I compared llvm-gcc's gt-dbxout.h with FSF gcc's, I found that type_queue was never used in FSF gcc's version. Does