search for: itanium

I always assumed Wine wasnt available on ia64 (note not x64), it certainly hasnt been in the last few Ubuntu ia64 releases when I checked. However Ive read a couple of posts and articles (some dating years back- http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-ivit.html) of people running it so I tried to compile. I can get it to ./configure, but make immediately dumps me to:

Hi Guys, I hope this is the correct mailing list for this question. I have a dual 1.6 Ghz Itanium with 4 Gb of memory. Yes, a lot of power for Asterisk. I am running SuSE Enterprise Server with the 2.6.5-7.97-default kernel. I have just started to look into Asterisk and I am in the building stage. Now building something on Itanium is almost always a bit of a challange. This is unfortunately...

...#39;d like to introduce myself, my company, and our upcoming use of LLVM. My name is John Reagan. I've been working on compilers and assemblers since 1983 (yes, 31 years). Most of that time was spent on compilers for VAX/VMS (later renamed to OpenVMS), then OpenVMS on Alpha, and OpenVMS on Itanium. I've also worked with the HP NonStop platform and was directly involved with the compilers for its upcoming port to x86. OpenVMS ended up at Hewlett-Packard after Digital was sold to Compaq, and Compaq was sold to Hewlett-Packard. HP transitioned OpenVMS to an engineering organization in...

...a >> performance bar. > > GCC is the best we can do right now for FreeBSD/ia64. That's why LLVM > is of interest. At least to me :-) Sure. LLVM has significantly better high-level design in its code generator than GCC does, which could be the host to some really interesting itanium-specific optimizations if someone was so inclined. However, this is a *significant* amount of work, and the perf work that will benefit many other classes of machines is unlikely to be the big winners on itanium. To get decent performance, we really need people dedicated to doing signific...

Your PxeLinux is really a good product and contains really good features (i.e memdisk). But PxeLinux is a very low level program, contains assembly code and seems to no be portable to Itanium architectures. Does a version of PxeLinux planned for Itanium architecture ? PS:On my configuration, option pxelinux.reboottime (code 211) you give in your documentation removes my "default router" option. Best regard, -- Erwan Velu Linux Cluster Distribution Project Manager MandrakeSoft...

> On Feb 2, 2015, at 6:04 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > I actually like the unified intrinsic approach here. The backend already has to know things about the personality function. Until recently we would assume that the personality function wants an Itanium LSDA, for example, and dump that out into a target-specific section. Now on Windows we look at the personality function and try to figure out what kind of preparation and tables it wants. > > It seems reasonable then that we could continue along the lines of classifying some personalities as...

I am trying to compile R-1.6.1 on an itanium. using either gcc 2.96 or gcc 3.0.4 nad either the supplied Redhat blas libs or the supplied code (ie wiht the --no-blas option) I get this error. Has anyone who has compiled R for the itanium advise me on the compilers versions and flags that they used? thanks bye rob...

...ith the IA64 backend. On the first level, it has not been maintained for a long time, and isn't able to compile hello world to a working app. This is a pretty bad state. On the second level, it will take a significant amount of work to make it produce code that is actually *fast* for itanium, because of the advanced architectural features of the chip. For us to keep IA64 around (and for it to be minimally useful for your work!), I think that the backend should pass most of the simple programs in MultiSource/Benchmarks for example. It does *not* need to produce amazingly fast...

We are trying out lld ELF on windows. It works great, but a big difference from running it on linux is that it cannot demangle c++ names since there is no itanium demangler available on windows. We have an implementation in libcxxabi/src/cxa_demangle.cpp. I see that there was some discussion about having a version of that in lib/Support, but I don't think a patch was ever posted. So, some questions * Is having an itanium demangler in lib/Support somet...

...backend. On the first > level, it has not been maintained for a long time, and isn't able to > compile hello world to a working app. This is a pretty bad state. On > the second level, it will take a significant amount of work to make it > produce code that is actually *fast* for itanium, because of the > advanced architectural features of the chip. *nod* > For us to keep IA64 around (and for it to be minimally useful for your > work!), I think that the backend should pass most of the simple > programs in MultiSource/Benchmarks for example. It does *not* need to >...

Red Hat is pleased to announce the availability of Update 2 for the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 family of products, including: - Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 4 for x86, AMD64/EM64T, Itanium, POWER, S/390 and zSeries - Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES 4 for x86, AMD64/EM64T, Itanium - Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS 4 for x86, AMD64/EM64T, Itanium - Red Hat Desktop 4 for x86 and AMD64/EM64T Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is be...

...tions? 2) How portable is _Unwind_RaiseException and similar functions? In particular, if I call those functions, will I be limiting myself to a subset of the platforms that LLVM supports? (The same question can be asked of __cxa_throw). Although _Unwind_RaiseException is mentioned as part of the Itanium ABI, it is apparently used on many more platform types than just that one processor. A code search shows that it is in fact part of the standard gcc-provided runtime libs (see http://www.google.com/codesearch/p?hl=en#47R7EH5FbNk/trunk/gcc/gcc/unwind-generic.h&q=_Unwind_RaiseException%20lang:c)....

Should I contact the local admin on this? [25/294] Linking CXX executable bin/llvm-itanium-demangle-fuzzer FAILED: bin/llvm-itanium-demangle-fuzzer : && /home/usr4/c74014i/opt/clang/current/bin/clang++ -fPIC -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time -Werror=unguarded-availability-new -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-field-initializers...

Dear All, I am new in Itanium server Installation and I have installed all the CentOS4.4 ia64 CDs and I have try to install clustersuite packages and i am getting the following error messages like error: %post(package name here) scriptlet failed, exit status 255 and error: %pre(package name here) scriptlet failed, exit status...

Hi, I am having some difficulties building llvm on Itanium. My procedure for building LLVM is: cd /liberty/llvm.ia64/llvm-2.1 ./configure make ENABLE_OPTIZED=1 cd /liberty/llvm.ia64/obj /liberty/llvm.ia64/llvm-gcc4.2-2.1.source/configure --prefix=/liberty/llvm.ia64/install --enable-llvm=/liberty/llvm.ia64/llvm-2.1/ --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-s...

On 6/21/17 5:42 PM, Rui Ueyama wrote: > I'm very interested in your work because I've just started writing a > demangler for the Microsoft mangling scheme. What I found in the > current Itanium demangler is the same as you -- it looks like it > allocates too much memory during parsing and concatenates std::strings > too often. I could see there's a (probably big) room to improve. > Demangler's performance is sometimes important for LLD, which is my > main project,...

Does anyone know if Xen is currently supporting Itanium on 64 Bit!? Thomas Diederich ************************************************** * Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co.KG * A Informationsverarbeitung / Diplomant Systemtechnik * * Mail: diederit@ing.boehringer-Ingelheim.com <mailto:diederit@ing.boehringer-Ingelheim.com> * Phone:...

For those interested in reading on Vanderpool Technology. Intel(r) Vanderpool Technology Preliminary Specification for IA-32 and Intel(r) Itanium(r) Processors are at: www.intel.com/technology/vt. Thanks Sunil _______________________________________________ Core Software Division, Software & Solutions Group Off: (408) 765-5272; Cell (408) 838-8749; Fax (408) 653-5330

...is _Unwind_RaiseException and similar functions? In > particular, if I call those functions, will I be limiting myself to a subset > of the platforms that LLVM supports? (The same question can be asked of > __cxa_throw). > > Although _Unwind_RaiseException is mentioned as part of the Itanium ABI, it > is apparently used on many more platform types than just that one processor. > A code search shows that it is in fact part of the standard gcc-provided > runtime libs (see > http://www.google.com/codesearch/p?hl=en#47R7EH5FbNk/trunk/gcc/gcc/unwind-generic.h&q=_Unwind_Raise...

Hi, I've figured out a little more. #if defined DBX_DEBUGGING_INFO || XCOFF_DEBUGGING_INFO guards the declaration of type_queue, however, neither is defined on Intanium. In gt-dbxout.h type_queue's uses are unguarded and thus are undefined on Itanium. When I compared llvm-gcc's gt-dbxout.h with FSF gcc's, I found that type_queue was never used in FSF gcc's version. Does anyone know what DBX_DEBUGGING_INFO and XCOFF_DEBUGGING_INFO signify? I know that gt-dbxout.h is machine generated. Does anyone know where and how this machine g...