search for: iscs

Hi, ??? Anyone else had any issues with CentOS 6.10 bind DNS server issues this afternoon. At 16:26 (GMT) had alerts for DNS failures against our CentOS 6.10 bind DNS servers from our monitoring system. Sure enough DNS requests via the server was failing, checking the named.log showed dnssec issues; 25-Mar-2020 16:26:10.285 dnssec: info: validating @0xb48b17c0: push.services.mozilla.com

At Wed, 25 Mar 2020 17:03:23 +0000 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > ???????????? Anyone else had any issues with CentOS 6.10 bind DNS server issues Yes. The installed ISC DLV key installed with bind-9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.3.x86_64 seems to have expired and there does not appear to be a new bind-9.8.2 RPM with a new key. I guess you can

Hello, Freebsd-stable. BIND on my new router (7.1-STABLE, BIND 9.4.3-P1) shows bunch of errors on every start and doesn't answer on requests for 30-60 seconds after that. Errors are like this: Jan 24 12:18:12 gateway named[1455]: /usr/src/lib/bind/isc/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/isc/unix/socket.c:1567: unexpected error: Jan 24 12:18:12 gateway named[1455]: internal_send: 193.0.14.129#53:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have a global sieve rule in place to filter mailing-lists. This has worked well so far. Recently however one subscriber on a list seems to create strange character set encodings in the 'From' and 'To' headers. This leads to unprocessed/unfiltered mails (no errors thrown). Is this a configuration or Pigeonhole issue (latest HG used)?

Hi Rowland, I don't want to to run an AD DC on firewall device, barely DHCP and maybe DNS. What you have pointed me to is similar to what I have in place: https://blog.michael.kuron-germany.de/2011/02/isc-dhcpd-dynamic-dns-updates-against-secure-microsoft-dns/ and which is working fine. NOW I want to switch DHCP from isc-dhcp-server 4.2.2 on Debian to DHCP on pfSense firewall (based on

I use the sernet samba packages on debian sarge and have problems after upgrading to 3.0.25 with rid mappings. My rid configuration for 3.0.24 looks like this idmap backend = rid:ISC=500-100000000 idmap uid = 500-100000000 idmap gid = 500-100000000 after updating to 3.0.25 I get a core dump of winbind (log at the end of the post) with these settings. I tried to use the new configuration

TB --- 2008-06-03 09:06:24 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-06-03 09:06:24 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2008-06-03 09:06:24 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-06-03 09:06:55 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-06-03 09:06:55 - /usr/bin/csup -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s /tinderbox/RELENG_6/sparc64/sparc64/supfile TB ---

TB --- 2012-04-08 08:26:29 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-04-08 08:26:29 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #4: Wed Sep 28 13:48:49 UTC 2011 mdtancsa@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2012-04-08 08:26:29 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2012-04-08 08:26:29 - cleaning the

Dear Experts, I was running ISC DHCP server for longer than I would care to remember. Now I decided to climb out of the cave and configure failover set (primary-secondary), and I seem to hit brick wall, which I need help with. I only need IP v4, no v6, which may simplify things. Could someone point to a description of working DHCP failover configuration? I do not want to make two independent

Hello, Is it possible to use isc-dhcp for DDNS with Samba internal DNS? I would rather not use bind as I understand you can't use Windows DNS tool to manage. Thanks. -- -James

Hi-- Are folks familiar with: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-0997 http://www.isc.org/software/dhcp/advisories/cve-2011-0997 http://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2011/04/07/flaw-in-iscs-dhclient-could-allow-remote-code-execution/ Checking http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/dhclient/dhclient.c, I don't see signs that it may have been updated. But, I also can't readily tell which version of dhclient FreeBSD actually has and how much it might have been changed f...

On 07/01/19 7:04 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:55:59 +0530 > Biswajit Banerjee via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I have Samba4 AD ( V4.8 )environment with Bind 9 on the same server >> and want to have DNS updated from the DHCP ISC server( External) . As >> we see the the host records and reverse

Hi I have Samba4 AD ( V4.8 )environment with Bind 9 on the same server  and want to have DNS updated from the DHCP ISC server( External) . As we see the the host records and reverse records do not get updated dynamically on the Bind / DNS . Is it not the functionality to have DNS updated as soon as clients log in . If not , then probably we have to follow

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 For all those currently using BIND 8, please be aware of the notice below from ISC. Given that we have moved to BIND 9 for all of our releases from 5.x on (and BIND 9.4.x in 7-soon-to-be-release), and given that FreeBSD 4 was the last branch to have BIND 8, and itself is now EOL, the time has come to say good-bye to BIND 8. I will be

A long time, this apeared on the list: > Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 08:17:26 -0700 > From: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> > To: Gal Goldschmidt <gal at cs.haifa.ac.il> > Cc: syslinux at zytor.com > Subject: Re: [syslinux] ISC DHCPD Problem and Solution. > > Gal Goldschmidt wrote: > > > > All the station in that group suddenly did not receive the net

I am attempting to set up a separate ISC-DHCP server to administer IP addresses for a new subnet and dynamically update the main BIND9 DNS server on DC1. I'm using the guide linked below but it appears to be for installing the DHCP server directly on the domain controller. Is there any documentation available for updating BIND9 from a completely separate machine with ISC-DHCP installed? It

Does anyone remember if there is a way to coerce the ISC DHCPD version 2 (2.0pl5) to send options to a PXE client that does not explicitly request them. I can do this in version 3 of DHCPD via the vendor-option-space mechanism, but this is not available in version 2 of the server (the version my network switch uses). I want to be able to specify the PXE filename via option 209 (plus option 208

Good afternoon. The ISC (Internet Software Consortium) license[1] is a permissive, open-source license that is considered "functionally equivalent"[2] to the Simplified (2-clause) BSD[3] and MIT[4] licenses, but with extraneous language removed. There is at least one package on CRAN which incorporates some code using it[5]. Are there plans to include this license in the list at

hi all... again... i sent this message to general questions but nobody got excited about it. i just installed 6 on my t30 laptop. brand new. when trying dhclient i get: DHCPDISCOVER on fxp0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 5 this trys 6 times then this shows up: No DHCPOFFERS received. No working leases in present database - sleeping. i run a tcpdump while requesting a lease and for

TB --- 2008-06-03 08:42:30 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-06-03 08:42:30 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2008-06-03 08:42:30 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-06-03 08:43:09 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-06-03 08:43:09 - /usr/bin/csup -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s /tinderbox/RELENG_6/i386/i386/supfile TB --- 2008-06-03 08:43:22