search for: isbytecodefile

...3 but they do not come from this area of mine. Cheers, Gabor PS: the isCompressed flag seems redundant now, but I did not check. Also, I left the flag values untouched, they should probably be reassigned. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: isBytecodeFile-elim-aggr.diff Type: application/octet-stream Size: 10386 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070706/e97b465a/attachment.obj>

Here is the bulk of the sanitizing. My residual doubts center around the question whether we still do/want to support (un)compressed *byte*code in 2.0/2.1. I need a definitive word on this to proceed. My understanding is that bytecode is already gone, but there are still some functions/enums that really deal with *byte*code (instead of *bit*code). I did not touch those areas, so the attached