search for: bytecodefile

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "bytecodefile".

Did you mean: bitcodefile
2007 Sep 10
2
[LLVMdev] profiling with llvm-gcc4?
How can I do function profiling and BB profiling with current llvm and llvm-gcc4? runtime/libprofile is disabled when using llvm-gcc4, but... is there any alternative to linking with libprofile_rt.so? How can I use llvm-prof? is utils/profile.pl obsolete? Thanks in advance, josem
2007 Sep 10
0
[LLVMdev] profiling with llvm-gcc4?
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007, Jose M. Moya wrote: > How can I do function profiling and BB profiling with current llvm and > llvm-gcc4? > > runtime/libprofile is disabled when using llvm-gcc4, but... is there any > alternative to linking with libprofile_rt.so? > > How can I use llvm-prof? is utils/profile.pl obsolete? The profiling support in LLVM hasn't been used for quite a
2007 Sep 11
1
[LLVMdev] profiling with llvm-gcc4?
...$LLIPath = `which lli`; -$LLIPath = `dirname $LLIPath`; -chomp $LLIPath; +my $libdir = `llvm-config --libdir`; +chomp $libdir; -my $LibProfPath = $LLIPath . "/../../Debug/lib/profile_rt.so"; +my $LibProfPath = $libdir . "/profile_rt.so"; system "opt -q -f $ProfilePass $BytecodeFile -o $BytecodeFile.inst"; system "lli -fake-argv0 '$BytecodeFile' -load $LibProfPath " .
2007 Jul 05
2
[LLVMdev] PATCH (rest of code changes) "bytecode" --> "bitcode"
Here is the bulk of the sanitizing. My residual doubts center around the question whether we still do/want to support (un)compressed *byte*code in 2.0/2.1. I need a definitive word on this to proceed. My understanding is that bytecode is already gone, but there are still some functions/enums that really deal with *byte*code (instead of *bit*code). I did not touch those areas, so the attached