search for: irresponsible

Windows (stable) version tested in Wine. Needs Java 1.5 minimum. Available at www.jedit.org, source code available. Installation without an hitch. After installation, it asks you wether you want to start it. If you tick on yes, it is immediately prompted. Afterwards, your screen becomes black with only the main block (middle) to be seen. No possibility to close it and the rest is black. You can

There is a CentOS 5.2 machine that is sometimes found to be offline. It runs a few websites but nothing very high traffic. I happened to notice a few days ago that before it went down, one of the sites written in PHP was throwing errors that it could not connect to the MySQL backend. Two hours later, the whole server was down and wasn't even responding to SSH. It's not my box, but I may

On 3 March 2017 at 11:34, John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote: > On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Tony Mountifield wrote: > >> You mean just thrown away, or archived somewhere? Just thrown away would >> seem rather irresponsible... > > > Mirroring EPEL makes sense well before this point, as they don't keep old > versions of packages online either AFAIK. > > jh > > Indeed they aren't kept ... and since there hasn't been an EOL of EPEL before I honestly have no idea ... I've asked on...

...PhozZEYDE0VqEg at mail.gmail.com>, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > > This is especially important if you use anything from EPEL as EPEL5 will be > removed when RHEL goes EOL. You mean just thrown away, or archived somewhere? Just thrown away would seem rather irresponsible... Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org

Hi all, I have somewhat a strange problem that I could not figure out, maybe someone here can lelp. I have a script that uses scp to distribute files to many servers, I use '-o BatchMode=yes -o ConnectTimeout=2 options so the scp will not get stuck if something is wrong with the remote host. If the remote host is down (non-pingable) or sshd is down the timeout option works and the scp

....com> wrote: > > On 3 March 2017 at 11:34, John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote: > >> On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Tony Mountifield wrote: > >> > >>> You mean just thrown away, or archived somewhere? Just thrown away would > >>> seem rather irresponsible... > >> > >> Mirroring EPEL makes sense well before this point, as they don't keep old > >> versions of packages online either AFAIK. > >> > >> jh > > > > Indeed they aren't kept ... and since there hasn't been an EOL of EPEL >...

Hello Samba Team! I have a Samba fileserver installed on my network. Sometime I have a problem. There are some irresponsible users, who holds their network connections for no purpose. I want to disconnect forcedly such users . But I do not know how do it. Help me, please! Dementiy P. Saltaev, "Svyaztransneft", Volgograd, Russia, 01.27.2003; 13:41. -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbe...

On 02/01/18 02:22, Peter Moody wrote: > I would prefer that: > > * commercial vendors patched the software they sold We all would prefer that, but I think you know that in reality, very few customers have enough leverage to achieve that.? I have a number of IBM servers for which access to the remote console now requires old versions of Java and old browsers.? That's IBM.? If

...e configured to do so) one-way chown to arbitrary uid even for non priviledged users. However, whether the latter is good or bad is more or less irrelevant as there is no guarantee that numeric IDs are the same across two systems and chown is basically meaningless. In addition I think it's also irresponsible to blindly chmod files as different systems might have different access policies (e.g. different umasks). Therefore following patch (relative to OpenSSH 2.5.1p1) is suggested. Cheers. Andy. *** sftp-server.c.orig Tue Feb 13 03:40:56 2001 --- sftp-server.c Wed Feb 21 15:12:07 2001 *********...

...til now I wasn't missing any Windows program. As at the moment I can spare some free time I wanted to do a brief come back to Ragnarok Online. The problem that I found is that the installer crashes every single time I start the game (image link) (http://ompldr.org/vNXpheg), and then it becomes irresponsible (image link) (http://ompldr.org/vNXpiOA). This is what I did: 1 - Download the Ragnarok Online (http://www.playragnarok.com/) client (iRO-13.2Renewal-FullInstall-20101007-1357.msi (ftp://ftp.gravityus.com/Ragnarok_client/full/iRO-13.2Renewal-FullInstall-20101007-1357.msi)) 2 - Install the client...

Le 27/09/16 ? 16:17, Kasper Daniel Hansen a ?crit : > As a package author, it is in my opinion irresponsible to override these > system settings (which is why it is also impossible). You have no idea > what system it is being deployed on, as the it guy dedicated to install and maintain softs on our cluster I have a reasonable knowledge of the systems I work on. I don't want to distribute any...

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... Sorry for the late answer. > I have Ubuntu 22.04 with Samba 4.15.13 running in a VM and it just works > for myself. Exactly the same, but on a real hardware. > Had the user 'gaio' logged in previously, it will not work if the user > hasn't logged in at least once before the network has disconnected. Sure!

https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/12374#issuecomment-29446761 Here in discussion I proposed to deprecate JS responder because this technique is insecure and not pragmatic way to transfer data. It can be exploited in this way http://homakov.blogspot.com/2013/05/do-not-use-rjs-like-techniques.html i find this bug very often so i know what i''m talking about. With it attacker can

Hello list, i would like to use master user functionality in dovecot v1.2, but i just cant get it to work: Here?s my configuration: # dovecot -n # 1.2.9: /etc/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.18-164.10.1.el5PAE i686 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.4 (Tikanga) login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable(default): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(imap):

My boss is insisting we support fax, and I keep telling him that Fax over IP is very unreliable and not recommended and his immediate come-back is "Vonage does it." and it's very hard to figure out how. I don't think Vonage does T.38, the Linksys/Sipura units they're using doesn't support T.38 to my knowledge. That means they have to be using G.711Ulaw to send faxes.

...files. If there is any lag at all, such as you might find across a network, it assumes the files are unavailable and creates new, blank store files. Old messages are effectively lost, and cannot be retrieved without the use of third-party mailbox recovery tools. If you ask me, that's sloppy and irresponsible programming on Microsoft's part -- but then again, maybe it's intentional to force you to buy Outlook. -- --Jon Johnson Sutinen Consulting, Inc. www.sutinen.com (360) 270-9317 cell

...cheap and HiFi separates integratable like current-day CD players. All solutions I've seen are either expensive boutique heavy-weights or portable devices. Squeezebox doesn't count for me - requires PC to be on, thus breaking rule 3 above as a few-hundred Watt music player system (pretty irresponsible solution if you ask me in these times). -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac/attachments/20100115/3cfe678b/attachment.htm

...here are additional goals. Our current structure is broken in various ways (which I don’t want to enumerate in public), including potential legal issues with patches that come in from people who do not have commit access. If we don’t address these issues, then (in my personal opinion) it would be irresponsible to allow pull requests (assuming LLVM moves to github, which is still up in the air of course). > I still stand by my position that (2) isn't served alone by the APSL, > since it isn't clear who the contributing entity is. A click-thru CLA > for individual contributors would serve...

On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Tony Mountifield wrote: > You mean just thrown away, or archived somewhere? Just thrown away would > seem rather irresponsible... Mirroring EPEL makes sense well before this point, as they don't keep old versions of packages online either AFAIK. jh

...lt;james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > On 3 March 2017 at 11:34, John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote: >> On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Tony Mountifield wrote: >> >>> You mean just thrown away, or archived somewhere? Just thrown away would >>> seem rather irresponsible... >> >> >> Mirroring EPEL makes sense well before this point, as they don't keep old >> versions of packages online either AFAIK. >> >> jh >> >> > > Indeed they aren't kept ... and since there hasn't been an EOL of EPEL > before...