search for: invocations

On 17/11/2020 11:54, mj via samba wrote: > Hi, > > Checking a bit more today, as the two changes on DC4 have *still* not > propagated? to DC2/DC3, I discovered the > ?samba-tool drs uptodateness > command. > > I gives the following output, not sure what "unknown invocation ID" > means. I hope someone here is able to explain..? > > It's output: >

Same as MJ and You. So you have 5 DC's running. > >>> Unknown invocation ID 556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc > >>> Unknown invocation ID 7281ff0f-5af2-4ded-bdaf-362f1545d221 > >>> Unknown invocation ID 82b24c02-16cb-4ed1-b68b-a047c26886a9 > >>> Unknown invocation ID b97cc603-6d03-4ad0-8629-be408fed8d69 > >>> Unknown invocation

Hi, Checking a bit more today, as the two changes on DC4 have *still* not propagated to DC2/DC3, I discovered the samba-tool drs uptodateness command. I gives the following output, not sure what "unknown invocation ID" means. I hope someone here is able to explain..? It's output: > root at dc2:~# samba-tool drs uptodateness > Unknown invocation ID

Hi all, We are running a three DC samba AD, using 4.12.8 sernet packages. Very stable for years. Today at 12:30 my colleague moved two users from * CN=Users,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com to * OU=disabled,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com This change was done on the DC4 at 12:30 using LAM (ldap-account-manager version 7.3) Ever since that, my automated samba-tool ldapcmp scripts started reporting

...bove, I next try: > fm1<-lme(distance~age,data=Orthodont,random=~age|Subject) > summary(fm1) [...] Random effects: Formula: ~age | Subject Structure: General positive-definite, Log-Cholesky parametrization [...] Fixed effects: distance ~ age So the summaries of the two invocations give identical statements of the Random and Fixed Effects models, but the second adds "Log-Cholesky parametrization" to the "Structure", and the numerical results are very slightly different (though hardly enough to visible in this case). Finally, if I take the Comment ("#...

You forgot to reply to the list. Also CC'ing LLVMdev. On 3/12/10 1:41 PM, Edmund Grimley-Evans wrote: >>> clang -cc1 -triple thumbv7-eabi -O3 -target-cpu cortex-a8 t.c >>> -emit-llvm-bc >>> llc t.bc ... -view-legalize-dags >> You just answered your own question :). That will work quite nicely >> actually. > > Maybe it would if I knew exactly what

Duncan: I am only superficially familiar with LLVM structure. What I am trying to find out is if functions that have a single invocation are still found in the code during the compilation. In Open64 and other compilers, there is an early inlining pass that inlines all procedures that have a single invocation site. The reasoning is that if there is a single call to a procedure, then there is not

i am using rails -v 3.0.7.when i tried "rails generate scaffold try name:string number:decimal" , it gave following error message invoke active_record /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/yaml.rb:133:in `load'': syntax error on line 7, col 2: ` pool: 5'' (ArgumentError) from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/yaml.rb:133:in `load'' from

Hi, I would like to use dtrace to observe some behaviour in my J2EE app running in JBoss. I start JBoss normally in a 1.6 VM. When I try to enable set the ExtendedDTraceProbes flag using jinfo, I get a thread dump in the JBoss console and the message: "Unable to open door: target process not responding or HotSpot VM not loaded" in the jinfo console. I have tried this with both

...t disable all verification runs. The IR verifier is run 3 times: once prior to any optimization work, once between running the module passes and running the function passes, and finally at the end of all optimization prior to writing out optimized IR. -disable-verify knocks out the first and last invocations of the verifier, but leaves the middle invocation in. You can see this by throwing -debug-pass=Executions and running in a debugger. There is a noticeable pause between running the module and function passes. If you backtrace during this pause, you will see that you are in the verifier. If I accou...

Hello All, We are investigating writing a custom puppet report that would be a web app to show a change log for each host. The issue we are running into stems from how we run puppet. We run a daily cronjob in noop and report mode and fix inconsistency''s either by hand or by puppet depending on the host. This should change some what in the future as our puppet environment matures

Hi, I am trying to use the CSPADE function as part of the ArulesSequences package. When running with my own data I get a system invocation error, and also get the same when running the built in example with the zaki data: > example(cspade) And get the following error: preprocessing ...Error in cspade(zaki, parameter = list(support = 0.4), control = list(verbose = TRUE)) : system

I need to have multiple invocations of dovecot running, one for productions and then one or more for test/dev, doing things like trying different authentication methods, getting quota working, etc. I knew how to do this with inetd, but I have been convinced that direct invocation is preferable, so I need to know how to do multip...

* Hamcrest-style parameter matchers * Values returned and exceptions raised on consecutive invocations * Yields on consecutive invocations * Multiple yields on single invocation * Invocation dispatch fixed * Deprecated returning result of a Proc -- James. http://blog.floehopper.org

Hi, how do I compile c code from a char array in clang? Im using code from the interpreter example. Thanks. char *cCode; // the char array // fill array with code goes here... // Initialize a compiler invocation object from the clang (-cc1) arguments. const driver::ArgStringList &CCArgs = Cmd->getArguments(); llvm::OwningPtr<CompilerInvocation> CI(new CompilerInvocation);

hello, I am trying to build LLVM with default options. I am getting the following error message after make. [100%] Building C object tools/llvm-c-test/CMakeFiles/llvm-c-test.dir/metadata.c.o [100%] Building C object tools/llvm-c-test/CMakeFiles/llvm-c-test.dir/module.c.o [100%] Building C object tools/llvm-c-test/CMakeFiles/llvm-c-test.dir/object.c.o [100%] Building C object

Are LoopPasses allowed to maintain state between runOnLoop invocations? The documentation is not clear on this point. -Dave

Hi Nelson, > What I am trying to find out is if functions that have a single invocation are > still found in the code during the compilation. I'm pretty sure that static functions with a single invocation are always inlined. If doing link-time optimization, then pretty much any function with a single invocation will be inlined. I'm not sure what this has to do with "early

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1082 Summary: xauth list invocation has bogus "." argument Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.2p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: NetBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org

Hi all, I want to use the LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS support to create an installed toolchain image (via the install-distribution target). I'd also like the installed binaries to be stripped. If you're invoking a cmake install script directly, you can pass -DCMAKE_INSTALL_DO_STRIP=1 to cmake to request stripping. The install-* targets set up by LLVM's build system don't seem to