search for: investigatory

...do this, I can read fine, but I can no longer create/amend/delete. Anyone got any ideas how to fix this? -- Gary Stainburn This email does not contain private or confidential material as it may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000

...ation in it. If you have received it in error please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Security Notice: all e-mail, sent to or from this address, may be accessed by someone other than the recipient, for system management and security reasons. This access is controlled under Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, Lawful Business Practises.

...es print command = /usr/bin/smbtopdf '/var/spool/samba/' '%f' '%J' '%m' -- Gary Stainburn This email does not contain private or confidential material as it may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000

Hi I'm currently working on a project aiming at replacing all windows servers (about 20) in my company by linux servers. Some of these windows servers are windows 2000 domain controlers (one PDC and few BDCs) with active directory. We have about 900 client windows 2000 workstations and about 2/3 of them are domain members. Our goal is to replace the windows servers that are domain controlers

...it these errors, but I have no idea as to what is causing it. What I am hoping is that one of the experts on this list (perhaps one of the members of the core team who helped write `factanal`) can recognize what may be causing the call to `optim` to fails sometimes, and could suggest some possible investigatory paths or explain why it may not be possible to be solved. I'd also be happy to e-mail or post the compiled dll's if anyone wants to look at them directly, although that would require access to a SandyBridge running Windows 64 bit. Thank you very much, Avraham Adler

I'm trying to add a user to the domain admins group in vain. I've tried using the windows usrgrp tool. I've tried doing 'pdbedit -u username -G S-1-5-21-2351621536-730267382-1598341932-512' I've tried 'net groupmember ADD 'Domain Admins' username. The user I'm trying to add is already in the unixgroup that's mapped to the NTgroup. Does any one know

On 06/06/2014 02:33, Alexey Samsonov wrote: > Hi Alp, > > This warning should be fixed by r210301. However, consider > investigating why the frame size appears to be that large. I believe > we build this code with GCC as well and have seen no complaints > from its implementation of -Wframe-larger-than. CC'ing in llvmdev. Like Chandler said it could just be due to lack of

I''m looking for some evidence, backup up with dates and references, that shows that the Linux community responds to security problems more quickly than other OS vendors, and thus might be considered "more secure". A number of fairly high profile corporations are starting to look for such information as they consider Linux as an alternative solution to other UNIXes. Something