search for: intrees

On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Feb 9, 2016, at 9:40 AM, Jacques Pienaar via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > We would like to contribute a new backend for the Lanai processor > (derived from the processor described in [1]). > >

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Pete Cooper via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Sean Silva" <chisophugis at gmail.com> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2016 10:59:58 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Lanai backend > > > Hi Sean > > > I think you’ve

I have 2GB installed on my windows XP box running R 1.9.0, and after performing a prune.tree(intree,newdata), I get an out of memory error within R, but it says the maximum allowed is 1024gb (1/2 of what I have!) Can R not use more than 1GB on an XP box? I noticed I had ~600mb left over after R conked out, so clearly I had more memory... What about virtual memory? --j -- Jonathan Greenberg

On 02/09/2016 08:59 PM, Pete Cooper via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi Sean > > I think you’ve summed it up really well here. > > Personally I don’t think we should accept backends for which there is > no way to run the code. The burden (however small) on the community > to having an in-tree backend they can’t use is too high IMO. > > As you point out ‘no way to run the code’

You've raised an important point here Pete, and while I disagree pretty strongly with it (regardless of whether Lanai makes sense or not), I'm glad that you've surfaced it where we can clearly look at the issue. The idea of "it really should have users outside of just the people who have access to the HW" I think is deeply problematic for the project as a whole. Where does

On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:01 PM, Pete Cooper via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Feb 9, 2016, at 10:24 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> > wrote: > > You've raised an important point here Pete, and while I disagree pretty > strongly with it (regardless of whether Lanai makes sense or not), I'm glad > that you've

I've been having intermittent network issues on my Host - they go away when I stop and disable libvirtd and then reboot. They do not go away if I just stop libvirtd and don't reboot. I'm at a loss as to where to start with my troubleshooting, and being a relative n00b to libvirt, I'd love any pointers. Regards, Richard

...t;bst","brnn","Boruta","arm","elmNN"," > evtree","extraTrees","deepnet","kknn","KRLS","RSNNS","partDSA","plsRglm"," > quantregForest","ranger","inTrees") > >> new.packages <- list.of.packages[!(list.of.packages %in% > >> installed.packages()[,"Package"])] > >> if(length(new.packages)) install.packages(new.packages, dep = TRUE) > >> > >> #install.packages("mlr", dependencies =...

Hello, I'm facing issues with a Point of View GT210/218 and nouveau drivers. I'm using ubuntu server with LXDE on top of it... *lshw -c video* output: *-display description: VGA compatible controller product: GT218 [GeForce 210] vendor: NVIDIA Corporation physical id: 0 bus info: pci at 0000:01:00.0 version: a2 width: 64 bits clock:

..."brnn","Boruta","arm","elmNN"," >> >evtree","extraTrees","deepnet","kknn","KRLS","RSNNS","partDSA","plsRglm"," >> quantregForest","ranger","inTrees") >> >> new.packages <- list.of.packages[!(list.of.packages %in% >> >> installed.packages()[,"Package"])] >> >> if(length(new.packages)) install.packages(new.packages, dep = >TRUE) >> >> >> >> #install.packages("m...

Hi all, We would like to contribute a new backend for the Lanai processor (derived from the processor described in [1]). Lanai is a simple in-order 32-bit processor with: * 32 32-bit registers, including: * 2 registers with fixed values; * 4 used for program state tracking (PC, SP, FP, RCA); * 2 reserved for explicit usage by user (R10 and R11), used in threading library; * Up

Hi everyone. I''m a Xen newbie and I''m trying to get oriented here in the xeniverse. (Can I say that here?) My eventual goal is to set up multiple virtual xen servers in a minimum number of physical "boxes". My only knowledge of Xen so far is my careful reading of the famous paper "Xen - the Art of Virtualization". So I went to the web and searched Xen

I realize this falls under the category of "so incredibly vague I should maybe not send it", so I have low expectations and apologize beforehand if it's just pure noise. That being said - it appears that the whole HOST system becomes laggy. It can effect the mouse, the keyboard, the network. There are no messages in the logs that I can find that indicate the system is blocked or

On 10/12/2014 10:19 PM, Jd wrote: [please don't top-post on technical lists] > Thanks Kashyap, > The command line examples makes thing quite clear :) > rsync for image (large) files create a new file for every little > change, that was the reason I started looking in to using dirty bitmaps. Upstream qemu still doesn't have persistent dirty bitmap tracking working yet; once

I''m a Xen newbie, still trying to get oriented. I''m especially interested in building from sources, and I''m looking for some clarifications. Does anyone here build from sources, or should I perhaps subscribe to the developer''s list? At the moment, I''m mainly interested in just being a Xen user because I need to get up to speed here before even

I suppose it would help if I posted relevant version info (sorry about that...) CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 (Core) @ 3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.x86_64 systemd-219-42.el7_4.4.x86_64 $ modinfo virtio_scsi filename: /lib/modules/3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.x86_64/kernel/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.ko.xz license: GPL description: Virtio SCSI HBA driver rhelversion: 7.4 srcversion:

Hi to all I have a supermicro server with LSI 3108 with - 2x300GB SAS spin drive in raid1 (virtual drive 0) - 2x300GB SAS spin drive in raid1 (virtual drive 1) - 2x200GB Intel SSD DC S3710 drives configured as JBOD in LSI bios In the IPMI storage health status eveything looks fine until I boot into Centos 7.1 (unfortunatelly I didn't try other OS, but also I'm not interested in other)

Hello, I am running into some strange (to me) behavior trying to upgrade from 3.6.1p2 to 3.8p1 on Solaris 8. All of my machines are running 3.6.1p2 (Linux boxes have had RH errata applied). When I ssh with my AFS account name from any of them to the Solaris 8 box running 3.6.1p2, it responds with "afsuser at machine's password:". Once the password is given, I am logged in just

I get the source from CVS: # cvs -d :pserver:anonymous@dovecot.org:/home/cvs co dovecot-sieve Edit configure.in to change - AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([dsieve-config.h]) + AC_CONFIG_HEADERS(dsieve-config.h) Launch autogen.sh, and I have some errors: configure.in: 4: `automake requires `AM_CONFIG_HEADER', not `AC_CONFIG_HEADER' configure.in: 11: automake requires `AM_PROG_LEX', not

The series "HVM firmware passthrough" series in Jan 2013 from Ross Philipson cause two regressions for HVM guests which sadly found their way into the Xen 4.3 release. The first regression causes an incorrect count of tables to be placed in the main header, and can be seen by running dmidecode in any applicable HVM domain. The second regression found its way into the public ABI, making