Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "intimestamp".
2003 Aug 13
1
Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference intimestamp handling ?
>> > > ... On my PCs the mtime remains unmodified.
>> > > It's a weird thing if it happens under normal
>> > > circumstances ... But if it only happens when
>> > > you fake the identity from within the Office
>> > > programs, well, I wouldn't bother really.
>> > >
>> > I totally agree !
>>
>>
2003 Aug 15
1
Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference intimestamp handling ?
|> mtime being changed is beyond the pale. I suspect
|> ext3 is the problem. I heard some people losing all
|> of their data on ext3-formatted disks. Stay away
|> from it.
|
| Do you have some facts to back up that load of FUD?
| By all accounts I've ever seen, Ext. 3 has been
| stable for *long* time before it was even included
| in the stock Kernel tree.
Do you want to
2003 Aug 14
1
Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference intimestamp handling?
>> > > Fine. Use reiserfs and don't worry about ctime.
>> >
>> > Why? Does reiserfs handle ctime in a different
>> > way than other linux filesystems?
>>
>> It's not supposed to given the same instructions
>> from clients but it appears to because perhaps it
>> elicits different kind of response from Office.
>> Maybe