search for: interworkings

Greetings, As a developer and consultant who spends considerable time on projects involving the fusion of Asterisk and products derived from the SER ecosystem (OpenSER, Kamailio, OpenSIPS, the new SIP-Router), I have found that there is a great volume of interest in this topic on the mailing lists associated with all communities involved, but a comparative lack of focus that results in

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, I am writing to ask your help with what may be an nmbd interworking problem. The situation is as described in the samba distribution documenet BROWSING.TXT. I have LANS connected by routers to a central site. FreeBSD 2.2.2R/Samba 1.9.17 nmbds at the remote LAN act as WINS proxy's to a a Samba WINS at the central site. All is well when the WINS proxy samba and the

Hi all, I have a Windows XP PC and a Centos PC (Centos 4.3 release, kernel- 2.6.9-34.EL) which are in the same LAN. Currently, I am able to use VNC server on the centos to view the Windows PC, but not able to view the Centos PC from the Windows PC. This applies for even file sharing also. The samba server is running and I can view the windows network from Centos PC but in the Windows network, not

On 05/16/2013 10:06 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 3:17 AM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: >> On 05/15/2013 10:53 PM, Richard Smith wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:09 AM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: >>> On 05/06/2013 08:51 AM, Rafael Espíndola wrote: >>>>> It's working fine just that

I am trying to build a cross compiler for arm on linux, here is how i have configured it cd llvm-gcc-4.2-2.7.source-objtree ../llvm-gcc-4.2-2.7.source/configure --enable-llvm=/home/anatolyy/qctp406/pakman/depot/users/anatolyy/proto/crosscompiler/llvm-2.7 --enable-multilib --enable-target-optspace --enable-interwork --with-newlib --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --enable-languages=c,c++

Hi, I've just read the postings regarding the interworking between * and SER. As these persons seem quite knowledgeable on this, I would like to have their advise on my planned installation: - I have broadband cable access - I plan to install a SIP-aware router - I plan to install a Linux server with Digium analog IF card(s) for connection to my analog line (incoming and outgoing) - I plan

Hello everyone, The review http://reviews.llvm.org/D20951 implements initial support for the ARM architecture in LLD. To keep the patch size down, and to avoid the complexities of interworking between ARM and Thumb, there is just enough support for an ARM only Hello World to link and run on ARM Linux [*]. My main aim is to get this functionality committed as the basis of an ARM port and would

> ../llvm-gcc-4.2-2.7.source/configure > --enable-llvm=/home/anatolyy/qctp406/pakman/depot/users/anatolyy/proto/crosscompiler/llvm-2.7 > --enable-multilib --enable-target-optspace --enable-interwork > --with-newlib --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --enable-languages=c,c++ > --target=arm-elf This means that the compiler is built for ARMv4 which is not pretty good supported. Try to switch

I am looking to get the info about QSIG support in Asterisk. Does Asterisk have QSIG support? Does Asterisk support QSIG SIP Tunneling or QSIG SIP Interworking? If so, How to configure that? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060503/3cb7f966/attachment.htm

Did I understand from something Jeremy said recently that a recommended mode of operation for those wishing to try the full PDC support might be: 1. all file servers running production version (currently 2.0.4b) 2. single PDC machine running HEAD branch in order to get the stability and performance of the production version while still being able to use the latest PDC functionality? In

I noticed that LLD doesn’t preserve the symbol type for a defsym directive. For example: $ cat f.c void f() {} $ clang -c f.c $ ld.lld -shared --defsym=g=f f.o $ objdump -T a.out DYNAMIC SYMBOL TABLE: 00000000000012a0 g DF .text 0000000000000006 f 00000000000012a0 g D .text 0000000000000000 g f is marked as a function symbol, but g is not. I recognize this is hard to do in the general

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 3:17 AM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > On 05/15/2013 10:53 PM, Richard Smith wrote: > > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:09 AM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: >> >> On 05/06/2013 08:51 AM, Rafael Espíndola wrote: >>>> >>>> It's working fine just that it's ugly to see those APP/NOAPP markers.

I've been working on supporting ARM/Thumb interworking thunks in LLD and have encountered a limitation that I think it is worth bringing up in a wider context. This is all LLD specific, apologies if I've abused llvm-dev here. TL;DR summary: - Thunks in lld may not work if they are added to InputSections that have already been scanned. - There is a short term fix, but in the longer term I

On 05/15/2013 10:53 PM, Richard Smith wrote: > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:09 AM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com > <mailto:rkotler at mips.com>> wrote: > > On 05/06/2013 08:51 AM, Rafael Espíndola wrote: > > It's working fine just that it's ugly to see those > APP/NOAPP markers. > > Inline assembly is inline

Hi, How can I reserve an ARM register for only a part of the code? Example: lets say I have 3 functions, A(), B() and C(). I want to prohibit compiler from using a register (lets say X9 in ARM 64) in function C() only. I think that by AArch64RegisterInfo::getReservedRegs function, a register can be reserved for the whole program. But, I need to reserve for only part of the code. Can I

Hello - Here's my first impression review of the first SIP 802.11 phone. I got my hands on the "first" one sold, so that perhaps makes me the first person to have a real 802.11 SIP phone commercially in the US interworking with Asterisk. Whee! Can someone point me to other commercially shipping phones to prove me wrong?

Hi, is there any possibility to get a XEN DomO and DomU running with bridget and routed mode together. The reason behind this is, to get the requests via the official IPs to the DomU''s (routed-mode) and the interworking between the DomU''s with connected with help of the (bridged-mode). I got it work, with setting everything up manually. But as I understood the

I'm about to start working on range extension thunks in lld. This is an attempt to summarize the approach I'd like to take and what the impact will be on lld outside of thunks. I'm interested if anyone has any constraints the approach will break, alternative suggestions, or is working on something I'll need to take account of? I expect range extension thunks to be important for

Hello Rui, Thanks for the comments - Synthetic sections and rewriting relocations I think that this would definitely be worth trying. It should remove the need for thunks to be represented in the core data structures, and would allow . It would also mean that we wouldn't have to associate symbols with thunks as the relocations would directly target the thunks. ARM interworking makes reusing

Hi, Ive been playing on a asterisk to orion gsm box E1 pri setup. I have achieved incoming calls to be passed to my asterisk box successfully but outgoing calls will just I have tried playing with various pridialplan and overlapdial settings and with no success. If anyone can make more sense from the log, I'd certainly appreciate it. I am sending a 10 digit number to be dialed. I guessed