search for: interworking

Greetings, As a developer and consultant who spends considerable time on projects involving the fusion of Asterisk and products derived from the SER ecosystem (OpenSER, Kamailio, OpenSIPS, the new SIP-Router), I have found that there is a great volume of interest in this topic on the mailing lists associated with all communities involved, but a comparative lack of focus that results in

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, I am writing to ask your help with what may be an nmbd interworking problem. The situation is as described in the samba distribution documenet BROWSING.TXT. I have LANS connected by routers to a central site. FreeBSD 2.2.2R/Samba 1.9.17 nmbds at the remote LAN act as WINS proxy's to a a Samba WINS at the central site. All is well when the WINS proxy samba an...

Hi all, I have a Windows XP PC and a Centos PC (Centos 4.3 release, kernel- 2.6.9-34.EL) which are in the same LAN. Currently, I am able to use VNC server on the centos to view the Windows PC, but not able to view the Centos PC from the Windows PC. This applies for even file sharing also. The samba server is running and I can view the windows network from Centos PC but in the Windows network, not

...er place, I won't get those. It's just because the compiler is doing >> what I user would do that I'm getting them. >> > I would like to re-emphasize that you're not generating inline asm (or > well you shouldn't be) - you're generating a call stub and > interworking code between two ISAs. It's a very important distinction. > > -eric Right. I'm generating stubs for interworking between mips16 and mips32 when floating point registers are used in the call or return. I've said that in my emails but used the word interoperability instead of int...

I am trying to build a cross compiler for arm on linux, here is how i have configured it cd llvm-gcc-4.2-2.7.source-objtree ../llvm-gcc-4.2-2.7.source/configure --enable-llvm=/home/anatolyy/qctp406/pakman/depot/users/anatolyy/proto/crosscompiler/llvm-2.7 --enable-multilib --enable-target-optspace --enable-interwork --with-newlib --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --enable-languages=c,c++

Hi, I've just read the postings regarding the interworking between * and SER. As these persons seem quite knowledgeable on this, I would like to have their advise on my planned installation: - I have broadband cable access - I plan to install a SIP-aware router - I plan to install a Linux server with Digium analog IF card(s) for connection to my analog li...

Hello everyone, The review http://reviews.llvm.org/D20951 implements initial support for the ARM architecture in LLD. To keep the patch size down, and to avoid the complexities of interworking between ARM and Thumb, there is just enough support for an ARM only Hello World to link and run on ARM Linux [*]. My main aim is to get this functionality committed as the basis of an ARM port and would like to know how best to go about this? I wanted to start the ARM port with enough functionali...

...target-optspace --enable-interwork > --with-newlib --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --enable-languages=c,c++ > --target=arm-elf This means that the compiler is built for ARMv4 which is not pretty good supported. Try to switch to ARMv7, e.g. adding --with-cpu=cortex-a8. Also, LLVM might not support interworking yet, so it's worth to remove this option as well. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

I am looking to get the info about QSIG support in Asterisk. Does Asterisk have QSIG support? Does Asterisk support QSIG SIP Tunneling or QSIG SIP Interworking? If so, How to configure that? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060503/3cb7f966/attachment.htm

Did I understand from something Jeremy said recently that a recommended mode of operation for those wishing to try the full PDC support might be: 1. all file servers running production version (currently 2.0.4b) 2. single PDC machine running HEAD branch in order to get the stability and performance of the production version while still being able to use the latest PDC functionality? In

...u can have e.g. arithmetic being performed in the defsym, but in this particular case, it would seem desirable for the alias symbol to have the same type for the target. My question is if this will end up making any difference in practice. The case I'm concerned about in particular is ARM-Thumb interworking, where I believe there might be some logic that's based on symbol types. Is there any possibility that we'll have issues with that logic because of the alias not being marked as a function symbol?

...neration > to another place, I won't get those. It's just because the compiler is doing > what I user would do that I'm getting them. > I would like to re-emphasize that you're not generating inline asm (or well you shouldn't be) - you're generating a call stub and interworking code between two ISAs. It's a very important distinction. -eric

I've been working on supporting ARM/Thumb interworking thunks in LLD and have encountered a limitation that I think it is worth bringing up in a wider context. This is all LLD specific, apologies if I've abused llvm-dev here. TL;DR summary: - Thunks in lld may not work if they are added to InputSections that have already been scanned. - There is a...

On 05/15/2013 10:53 PM, Richard Smith wrote: > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:09 AM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com > <mailto:rkotler at mips.com>> wrote: > > On 05/06/2013 08:51 AM, Rafael Espíndola wrote: > > It's working fine just that it's ugly to see those > APP/NOAPP markers. > > Inline assembly is inline

Hi, How can I reserve an ARM register for only a part of the code? Example: lets say I have 3 functions, A(), B() and C(). I want to prohibit compiler from using a register (lets say X9 in ARM 64) in function C() only. I think that by AArch64RegisterInfo::getReservedRegs function, a register can be reserved for the whole program. But, I need to reserve for only part of the code. Can I

Hello - Here's my first impression review of the first SIP 802.11 phone. I got my hands on the "first" one sold, so that perhaps makes me the first person to have a real 802.11 SIP phone commercially in the US interworking with Asterisk. Whee! Can someone point me to other commercially shipping phones to prove me wrong? http://www.loligo.com/asterisk/misc/WiSIP/WiSIP-review.html JT

Hi, is there any possibility to get a XEN DomO and DomU running with bridget and routed mode together. The reason behind this is, to get the requests via the official IPs to the DomU''s (routed-mode) and the interworking between the DomU''s with connected with help of the (bridged-mode). I got it work, with setting everything up manually. But as I understood the "xen-config.sxp" can handle either routed or bridget, but not both together. So is there''re possibility or something what c...

...ail about range extension thunks at the end of this message for those not familiar with them. The name range extension thunks is by no means universal, for example in ARM's ABI documentation they are called veneers, The GNU linker calls them stubs. Summary of existing thunk implementation (ARM interworking and Mips PIC to non-PIC calls): - A Regular, Shared or Undefined symbol may have a single thunk - For each relocation to a symbol S, if we need a thunk we use the thunk for S as the target of the relocation rather than S. The thunk will transfer control to S. - Thunks are assigned to an InputSectio...

...locations I think that this would definitely be worth trying. It should remove the need for thunks to be represented in the core data structures, and would allow . It would also mean that we wouldn't have to associate symbols with thunks as the relocations would directly target the thunks. ARM interworking makes reusing thunks more difficult as not every thunk is compatible with every caller. For example: ARM B target and Thumb2 B.W target can't reuse the same thunk even if in range as the branch instruction can't change state. I think it is worth an experiment to make the existing implement...

...(8) len=9 < Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 6/0x6) (Terminator) < Message type: DISCONNECT (69) < [08 02 84 f5] < Cause (len= 4) [ Ext: 1 Coding: CCITT (ITU) standard (0) 0: 0 Location: Public network serving the remote user (4) < Ext: 1 Cause: Unknown (117), class = Interworking (7) ] -- Processing IE 8 (cs0, Cause) -- Channel 0/1, span 2 got hangup request NEW_HANGUP DEBUG: Calling q931_hangup, ourstate Disconnect Indication, peerstate Disconnect Request > Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=9 > Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 6/0x6) (Originator) > Message typ...