search for: intersystem

...=m CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_852=m CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_1250=m CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_1=m CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_2=m CONFIG_NLS_UTF8=m CONFIG_CRC32=y CONFIG_ZLIB_INFLATE=m --- end --- -- Jan Kundrat jan.kundrat@fzu.cz ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.sour...

...r-- 1 root root 1807764 Nov 15 21:49 vmlinuz-2.6.9-xen0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1017813 Nov 15 21:49 vmlinuz-2.6.9-xenU lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Nov 15 21:49 xenolinux.gz -> vmlinuz-2.6.9-xen0 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.sour...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Is the sata_nv (based on SCSI) driver supposed to work with Xen? When I tried to boot my dom0 kernel recompiled with the sata_nv drivers enabled my kernel locks up, I guess when probing the first drive connected via S-ATA. ("Screenshot" here: <URL:http://mjh.name/xen.lock.1.jpg>) (Kernel also says that partition tables of the

Xen appears to kernel panic. Boot up terminates and hangs with the message "agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 152 M. " This is a compiled Xen-2.0 latest snapshot with agp support in the kernel. Has anyone else had similar problems with agp? Nate ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express

...39;ve got a problem believing either of these since: a. I managed to send the failing file systems quite successfully using standard "rcp" (remote copy) command. In fact rcp was twice as fast as rsync (23MB/s+ v's 10-11MB/s) which I'm worried about. b. No other problems noted with intersystem comms or these filesystems. c. Other file systems which worked fine with rsync contained more data - and were therefore larger - than some of the failing ones, so it's not a file system size issue. At the time I tried playing with some of the rsync parameters, dropping --whole-file and adding...

...rt/knowledgecenter/ssw_aix_71/com.ibm.aix.performance/natl_lang_supp_locale_speed.htm > https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23824_01/html/E26033/glmbx.html > http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/nlsref/69741/HTML/default/viewer.htm#n1n9bwctsthuqbn1xgipyw5xwujl.htm > https://docs.intersystems.com/latest/csp/docbook/DocBook.UI.Page.cls?KEY=GSA_config_nls > https://sites.ualberta.ca/dept/chemeng/AIX-43/share/man/info/C/a_doc_lib/aixprggd/genprogc/nls.htm > http://scc.ustc.edu.cn/zlsc/tc4600/intel/2017.0.098/compiler_f/common/core/GUID-1AEC889E-98A7-4A7D-91B3-865C476F603D.ht...

The R signon banner includes this statement: Natural language support but running in an English locale Should that not say 'National' instead of 'Natural'? Meaning that LOCALE support is enabled, not that the interface understands human language? Please ignore this and forgive me if this is an inappropriate post. I am a N00B in R. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi I have Redhat ES4.0 with dovecot-0.99.11-2.EL4.1 installed. Reading a post Outlook Duplicates issue is still killing me, there seems to be asolution to this, I was wondering when this will be available on redhat es40? # Note that Outlook 2003 seems to have problems with %v.%u format which is # Dovecot's default, so if you're building a new server it would be a good # idea to

...x_71/com.ibm.aix.performance/natl_lang_supp_locale_speed.htm > >> https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23824_01/html/E26033/glmbx.html > >> > http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/nlsref/69741/HTML/default/viewer.htm#n1n9bwctsthuqbn1xgipyw5xwujl.htm > >> > https://docs.intersystems.com/latest/csp/docbook/DocBook.UI.Page.cls?KEY=GSA_config_nls > >> > https://sites.ualberta.ca/dept/chemeng/AIX-43/share/man/info/C/a_doc_lib/aixprggd/genprogc/nls.htm > >> > http://scc.ustc.edu.cn/zlsc/tc4600/intel/2017.0.098/compiler_f/common/core/GUID-1AEC889E-98A7-4A7D-...

...https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/ssw_aix_71/com.ibm.aix.performance/natl_lang_supp_locale_speed.htm https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23824_01/html/E26033/glmbx.html http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/nlsref/69741/HTML/default/viewer.htm#n1n9bwctsthuqbn1xgipyw5xwujl.htm https://docs.intersystems.com/latest/csp/docbook/DocBook.UI.Page.cls?KEY=GSA_config_nls https://sites.ualberta.ca/dept/chemeng/AIX-43/share/man/info/C/a_doc_lib/aixprggd/genprogc/nls.htm http://scc.ustc.edu.cn/zlsc/tc4600/intel/2017.0.098/compiler_f/common/core/GUID-1AEC889E-98A7-4A7D-91B3-865C476F603D.html It does appear...

Hello. I was just brainstorming for a future project and was hoping to get some creative ideas from the list. If I have multiple * servers at multiple locations all connected together with a nicely partitioned dialplan (2XX for office 1, 3XX for office 2, etc.) it's pretty straightforward to link them all using IAX and allow intra-office transfers. Further, servers at each location are

...believing either of these since: > a. I managed to send the failing file systems quite successfully using > standard "rcp" (remote copy) command. In fact rcp was twice as fast as > rsync (23MB/s+ v's 10-11MB/s) which I'm worried about. > b. No other problems noted with intersystem comms or these filesystems. > c. Other file systems which worked fine with rsync contained more data - > and were therefore larger - than some of the failing ones, so it's not a > file system size issue. > > At the time I tried playing with some of the rsync parameters, dropping...

I ran some iperf tests today and it looks like the etherbridge is the limiting factor on throughput. In the beforetime, I saw great throughput to the VMs; over 800 Mbps. With the bridge, the numbers are in the 400s somewhere. Is this the speed I can expect from the bridge? Is there some tuning I should try, or another way to get more bandwidth into the VMs? This is with xen-2.0, 2.4.27-xen0

...rt/knowledgecenter/ssw_aix_71/com.ibm.aix.performance/natl_lang_supp_locale_speed.htm >> https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23824_01/html/E26033/glmbx.html >> http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/nlsref/69741/HTML/default/viewer.htm#n1n9bwctsthuqbn1xgipyw5xwujl.htm >> https://docs.intersystems.com/latest/csp/docbook/DocBook.UI.Page.cls?KEY=GSA_config_nls >> https://sites.ualberta.ca/dept/chemeng/AIX-43/share/man/info/C/a_doc_lib/aixprggd/genprogc/nls.htm >> http://scc.ustc.edu.cn/zlsc/tc4600/intel/2017.0.098/compiler_f/common/core/GUID-1AEC889E-98A7-4A7D-91B3-865C476F603D.ht...

Hi, I have samba server joined to ADS domain (Windows Server 2003 r2) It seems it works ok besides I can't see right access mask and edit them (if logged user is ownder of directory or file). smb.conf workgroup = CXX security = ads passdb backend = tdbsam realm = CXX.INTERNAL.COM password server = main [u] path = /mnt/u readonly = no browseable = yes acl group control