search for: interlinx

> -----Original Message----- > From: Brian J. Murrell [mailto:brian@interlinx.bc.ca] > > - Single Sign-On via Kerberos > > OK. Actually I understood this feature. I am just wondering how it > applies in an MS network. SSO to all of what? If my DCs are my > file/printer server(s) (let's say I mirror the data contents > of my PDC to > my BDC...

...ct: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy: brian at interlinx.bc.ca QAContact: xorg-team at lists.x.org 9 times out of 10, trying to start mythtv's mythfrontend it will segfault with the following stacktrace: #0 nouveau_fence_update (screen=0x0, flushed=1 '\001') at nouveau_fence.c:141 fence = <optimized out> nex...

...tiple link-dest dirs not working Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: brian at interlinx.bc.ca QA Contact: rsync-qa at samba.org If I try to use multiple --link-dest dirs they are not being searched exhaustively for a file to link to. Observe: # rsync -aiSPHAX --link-dest $PWD/monthly.0/f/sbin/ --link-dest $PWD/monthly.1.new/f/sbin/ --link-dest $PWD/weekly.3/f/sbin/ weekly.3...

I seem to be running into a problem where I am trying to rsync from a source directory that lacks write permissions (i.e. r-xr-xr-x). Presumably this is because rsync creates the directory on the destination, then sets the permissions to match the source and then tries to sync the contents of the directory, which it cannot of course lacking write permission in the directory. Is there a way to

Slightly OT, but I'm wondering if anyone here has come across a "soft ATA". That is, software that will perform the functions of a basic POTS line ATA on Linux with a zaptel driven card. I have a Linux machine with a zaptel card in it and I want to have another Linux machine running Asterisk utilize the zaptel card in the first Linux machine to make outgoing and receive

I think I understand what Active Directory is all about. I understand LDAP and I understand Kerberos. I can see how AD (well, Kerberos actually) enables single-sign-on (I assume it deals in tickets with the Windows clients as standard Kerberos clients do) and can make life easy in a large network (which, IIRC was one of the design goals of Kerberos in the first place). But lets say I have a

Morning list, Was curious if it is possible to decrease the time asterisk takes to answer an incoming call to a zaptel interface. Example: [Jun 11 09:33:06] VERBOSE[4489] logger.c: -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/2-1' [Jun 11 09:33:10] NOTICE[4489] chan_zap.c: Got event 18 (Ring Begin)... [Jun 11 09:33:12] NOTICE[4489] chan_zap.c: Got event 2 (Ring/Answered)... [Jun 11 09:33:12]

...needs updating) Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: brian at interlinx.bc.ca QAContact: rsync-qa at samba.org Given two files: # /bin/ls -li {source,dest}/var/lib/mysql/mythconverg/jobqueue.MYD 44695517 -rw-rw---- 2 sshd messagebus 5492 2012-01-19 00:31 source/var/lib/mysql/mythconverg/jobqueue.MYD 49676928 -rw-rw---- 1 sshd messagebus 5492 2012-01-18 12:0...

Hi, as per the shorewall MultiISP documentation ( http://www1.shorewall.net/MultiISP.html ), it says "Use of this feature requires that your kernel and iptables include CONNMARK target and connmark match support (Warning: Standard Debian™ and Ubuntu™ kernels are lacking that support!)." it means MultiISP wont work properly if i am using Ubuntu server. if yes whats the

So I have (and have had) jabber configured for some time, specifically for GTalk, but something has occurred to me. If somebody happens to send an IM (text) to that account, nobody is going to be receiving it. I'd like to send a canned message back to any sender of an IM. Possible? b. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7870 Summary: --link-dest=${SRC} ${SRC} ${DST} can be smarter Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: weerd+rsync at

...nder, sending copy to the list, because it might be relevant for others... Sorry for the confusion. Vojtech Kral -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [compiz] multiscreen Date: 2013-01-09 23:59 From: Vojtech Kral <vojtech at kral.hk> To: "Brian J. Murrell" <brian at interlinx.bc.ca> Hello Brian, I actually use compiz on multi-screen for development at work. I solve this problem by moving my web browser window to the other screen and _make it sticky_. That way, no matter to what desktop I move, the browser window stays visible on the other screen. I assigned the...

...> +972-50-7952406 mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com > http://www.xorcom.com iax:guest at local.xorcom.com/tzafrir > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:53:43 -0400 > From: "Brian J. Murrell" <brian at interlinx.bc.ca> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Astricon people please post the > announcement > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> > Message-ID: <1222365223.25585.222.camel at pc.ilinx> > Conten...

...ually sparse on destination Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: brian at interlinx.bc.ca QAContact: rsync-qa at samba.org If I create a 0 block sparse file and then rsync it, it's not 0 blocks on the copy. Here's a reproducer: $ rsync --version rsync version 3.0.7 protocol version 30 Copyright (C) 1996-2009 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others. Web...

This is going to be a bit of an odd situation, but perhaps might become more and more common (as mobile phone SIP clients utilize PUSH proxies instead of the battery draining direct registering with SIP servers). I have a SIP client which can be on the same RFC-1918 LAN as my Asterisk server. Even though it's on the same LAN as the Asterisk server, it's registration comes from an IP

if i have this setup: [sip users] -- [asterisk] --- [as5300] --- [pstn] asterisk will talk to as5300 using sip. i will use as5300 as a trunk on the asterisk so sip users can call out to pstn. what i would like to is do prepaid on those trunks, not on the sip users. sip users can call any other sip users . i want to do it that way coz i'm trying to build a multi-tenant pbx, and i will use

I'm wondering what the status of multiscreen support is supposed to be in 0.9.7.12. Using Ubuntu Precise, it seems that compiz only manages 1 screen and if you want compiz on both screens of a dual screen set up you need to start two compiz sessions as such: $ DISPLAY=:0.0 compiz --replace $ DISPLAY=:0.1 compiz --replace What makes this all so strange is that even when one starts only the

Does anyone have a better ENUM lookup handler than the built-in ENUMLOOKUP() function? The built-in function does not properly handle multiple return values such as: 8.9.9.3.2.8.8.6.6.8.1.e164.org has NAPTR record 200 10 "u" "E2U+SIP" "!^\\+1866(.*)$!sip:1866\\1 at tollfree.sip-happens.com!" . 8.9.9.3.2.8.8.6.6.8.1.e164.org has NAPTR record 200 10 "u"

Is there any less cumbersome way of doing conditionalized/branching in extensions.conf other than something like: exten => s,n,GotoIf($["${SIP}" = "PJSIP" ]?pjsip) exten => s,n,Dial(${ARG2},20,TtWw) exten => s,n,Goto(afterdial) exten => s,n(pjsip),Dial(${PJSIP_DIAL_CONTACTS(${STRREPLACE(ARG2,"PJSIP/","")})},20,TtWw) exten =>

...se them. Instabilties and backups aside, the Windows ACL management is primitive - Novell had excellent ACL management where you could see everything on one screen but I have seen nothing like that for Windoze platforms). HTH Noel -----Original Message----- From: Brian J. Murrell [mailto:brian@interlinx.bc.ca] Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 6:56 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba] Why would I want Active Directory (rather, how to argue against it?) I think I understand what Active Directory is all about. I understand LDAP and I understand Kerberos. I can see how AD (well, Kerberos ac...