search for: intentioned

Hello list, I'm trying to make sure that I'm performing a path analysis correctly using the sem package. the figure at http://flame.cs.dal.ca/~sstewart/regressDiag.png has a detailing of the model. The challenge I'm having is that reuse is an indicator (0/1) variable. Here's the code I'm using: corr =

Note I'm not asking for any legal advice here obviously, simply what the intention of the R foundation is with regard to allowing commercial connection to R. I've looked at various threads on the r-devel archive and it looks like this may have been discussed before, but as far as could tell, not to any great resolution, and not, it seems, specifically covering this angle. In the

First, I archive the old messages in the INBOX on my list account # doveadm -Dv move -u kremels at kreme.com Archive mailbox INBOX BEFORE 90d Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm Debug: Skipping module doveadm_acl_plugin, because dlopen() failed:

I can create a small dataset, "x" below, and subset out rows based on values of a certain variable. However, on the dataset I'm working on now, "latdata" below, I get a subscript error. Any advice is appreciated! Ryan Successful: > is.data.frame(x) [1] TRUE > x X1 X2 X3 1 1 3 5 2 2 4 6 > x[x$X2 %in% c(3),] X1 X2 X3 1 1 3 5 Unsuccessful: >

why does dovecot touch any ever used fuse-mountpoint and scream at the next start that is no longer mounted? "If this is intentional, remove it with doveadm mount" why if i never called "doveadm" on any setup at all? Jul 10 09:10:56 rh dovecot: master: Dovecot v2.1.8 starting up (core dumps disabled) Jul 10 09:10:56 rh dovecot: master: Warning: /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu is no longer

Dear Dovecot users/devs, I have the following mbox file: /tmp/dsync_test/mbox/2002-September I would like to convert it to a Maildir: /tmp/dsync_test/maildir (Currently, the latter is just an empty directory.) I am attempting this on an old PC running Debian 9 ("Stretch"). I installed the dovecot-core package in order to make the `dsync` tool available on that PC. I have

On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 11:36 AM David Blaikie via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 10:46 AM Mircea Trofin <mtrofin at google.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 10:40 AM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at

Hi, I am trying to understand how assume shaped arrays are received and processed in LLVM IR. I am using "flang" for my front end. There seems to be an array descriptor received as implicit argument for every assume shaped array. For my test routine: ---snip-- SUBROUTINE test(a,b,Li,Lj,Istr,Iend,Jstr,Jend) INTEGER, INTENT(IN) :: Li,Lj INTEGER, INTENT(IN) :: Istr, Iend,

On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 at 13:05, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I think Geroge (cc'ed) knows better than me in that area. > > lld is underdocumented, and in particular there is virtually no documentation about its linker script support. Our basic strategy is to follow the GNU's documentation and the implementations unless it is too hard or

On 19.6.2019 5.44, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote: > First, I archive the old messages in the INBOX on my list account > > # doveadm -Dv move -u kremels at kreme.com Archive mailbox INBOX BEFORE 90d Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm > Debug:

On 25/06/2014 21:03, Eli Bendersky wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com > <mailto:alp at nuanti.com>> wrote: > > For whatever reason, patches posted to the Phabricator website > still aren't being sent to the mailing list, making it difficult > for us to review them. > > I've raised this issue a couple

I think it would make more sense to add it at each individual call site. This ensures that all cases are fixed, rather than just one in a file. It also ensures that in the (hopefully unlikely) event that there are both intentional and unintentional use-cases within a file, each one gets checked. On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 20:29, Mircea Trofin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> On 13/05/2020 10:11 Sam Kuper <sampablokuper at posteo.net> wrote: > > > Dear Dovecot users/devs, > > I have the following mbox file: > > /tmp/dsync_test/mbox/2002-September > > I would like to convert it to a Maildir: > > /tmp/dsync_test/maildir > > (Currently, the latter is just an empty directory.) > > I am attempting this

Possibly more of a legal question than a technical development question, but here goes. In the doc\COPYRIGHTS file it is made clear that the intention is that you can write R packages and distribute them under licenses not compatible with GPL, by making the relevant header files available under the LGPL. This was an explicit change that was made in February 2001, and allows for DLLs that

Okay, I'm asking this again. As of 2.2.0p1, the *only* program that knows how to invoke ssh-askpass is ssh-add. Not ssh itself, nor scp understand how to invoke ssh-askpass. This is a direct contrast to ssh-1.2.27, in which all clients know how to invoke ssh-askpass. My question: is the limitation that only ssh-add knows how to invoke ssh-askpass intentional (i.e., a deliberate design

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On CentOS 6 I noticed very high load after installing and while the md raid 1 array was syncing. I found lots of complaints about performance degradation for md raid with enabled write-intent bitmap. See http://blog.liw.fi/posts/write-intent-bitmaps/ for example. So I wanted to it off. I let it sync and then removed the bitmap. Do you know of a

> > If you can convince openssl to use it. Does anybody have any hints on how it may be done, if possible at all? Stavros

After done an update to dovecot-2.2.30.2 my connection is broken since days. all what I try every time the same error: Jun 15 00:02:18 auth: Error: auth: environment corrupt; missing value for DOVECOT_ Jun 15 00:02:18 auth: Fatal: unsetenv(RESTRICT_SETUID) failed: Bad address Jun 15 00:02:18 master: Error: service(auth): command startup failed, throttling for 2 secs I try this: # doveadm

There's a wrinkle in this: some tests (clang ones, for instance) have output checks depending on the line position of the input. For example, they check debug info. Adding // FIXME: comments shift that. If the goal is easy identification of auto-inserted -allow-unused-prefixes directives, how about: - we make the flag an enum: true, false, and auto_inserted - we use

I recently discovered that multi-line RUN statements can actually be interrupted with non-RUN lines, without changing the behaviour. In other words, you can do something like: # RUN: some command --option1 \ ## Comment # CHECK: check something # RUN: --option2 And you'd end up with "some command --option1 --option2" being run. It's rather surprising behaviour, and not one