search for: instruction1

> No. Bundles with single instructions are not allowed, but bundles can be > mixed with instructions that are not bundled. > > -Krzysztof > > -- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted > by The Linux Foundation > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >

...ce. In this case, now finding dependence turns to be a preliminary issue ). -------------------------------------------------------------------- I think people may get confused about what I am talking. Just make it short and clear. For example, I have a few instructions in the same basic block. instruction1: add %a %b %c ... instruction10: add %e %d %a Now I use this code to identify the source operands. for(int k=0; k<OpNum; k++){ errs()<<it->getOperand(k)<<" "; } I find that %b->0x90 %c->0x91 %d->0x92 %a->0x93 but I do not know %a->? %e->? Actuall...

Launcher <st.liucheng at gmail.com> writes: > I am able to access the source operands of an instruction using either > getOperand() or op_iterator, However, I can't find any method available for > destination operand. Someone suggests that instruction itself can represent > the destination operand. > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2011-January/037518.html

I am able to access the source operands of an instruction using either getOperand() or op_iterator, However, I can't find any method available for destination operand. Someone suggests that instruction itself can represent the destination operand. http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2011-January/037518.html The getOperand() returns an unsigned value like 0x9063498, while I can't

You can have > > BUNDLE // 2 instructions in a bundle > instruction1 // > instruction2 // > instruction3 // single, non-bundled instruction > BUNDLE // another bundle with 2 instructions > instruction4 // > instruction5 // > > instruction3 is not bundled with anything, and it's between two other > bundles---that'...