search for: instrcutions

I want to create a clean .rpm package for R built with MKL and ICC. I follow Fedora instrcutions[0] to create the package. As a base, I use the R-3.2.2.src.rpm. I am left with this error: ------------------------------------------ installing R info pages ... updating '/usr/share/info/dir' ... make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILD/R-3.2.2/doc/manual' + mv...

...unc i64 %indvars.iv.next.2 to i32* * %exitcond.2 = icmp ne i32 %lftr.wideiv.2, %n* * br i1 %exitcond.2, label %.lr.ph <http://lr.ph/>, label %._crit_edge* *}* As you can see, at the end of BB <label>4 and BB<label>7 there are "add", "icmp" and "br" instrcutions to check the boundary. I understand this is for the correctness. However, I would expect the loop unrolling can change my code to something like this: *void foo( int n, int array_x[])* *{* * int j = n%3;* * int m = n - j;* * for (int i=0; i < m; i+=3){* * array_x[i] = i;* * arr...

...i32* > * %exitcond.2 = icmp ne i32 %lftr.wideiv.2, %n* > * br i1 %exitcond.2, label %.lr.ph <http://lr.ph/>, label %._crit_edge* > *}* > > As you can see, at the end of BB <label>4 and BB<label>7 there are "add", > "icmp" and "br" instrcutions to check the boundary. I understand this is > for the correctness. However, I would expect the loop unrolling can change > my code to something like this: > > *void foo( int n, int array_x[])* > *{* > * int j = n%3;* > * int m = n - j;* > * for (int i=0; i < m; i...

On 09/07/2015 06:16 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > I want to create a clean .rpm package for R built with MKL and ICC. I > follow Fedora instrcutions[0] to create the package. As a base, I use > the R-3.2.2.src.rpm. > > I am left with this error: > > ------------------------------------------ > installing R info pages ... > updating '/usr/share/info/dir' ... > make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/poisonivy/rpmb...

svn?co?https://agx-ast-addons.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/agx-ast-addons?agx-ast-addons ./build_sh from the trunk. ? -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Olivier Sent: 10 February 2009 18:35 To: michael at networkstuff.co.nz; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject:

...%lftr.wideiv.2, %n* >>> * br i1 %exitcond.2, label %.lr.ph <http://lr.ph/>, label %._crit_edge* >>> *}* >>> >>> As you can see, at the end of BB <label>4 and BB<label>7 there are >>> "add", "icmp" and "br" instrcutions to check the boundary. I understand >>> this is for the correctness. However, I would expect the loop unrolling can >>> change my code to something like this: >>> >>> *void foo( int n, int array_x[])* >>> *{* >>> * int j = n%3;* >>>...

For someone that wants to begin securing his or her network. What would be the starting point ? I guess in sort of a check list format. I mean as of now Im not administering a network. But in the old company I used to work for. Security was a big problem there were no polices in place. And in what ways can one reduce the amount of work it take to keep up with securing and monitoring a diversed

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote: > On 09/07/2015 06:16 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: >> I want to create a clean .rpm package for R built with MKL and ICC. I >> follow Fedora instrcutions[0] to create the package. As a base, I use >> the R-3.2.2.src.rpm. >> >> I am left with this error: >> >> ------------------------------------------ >> installing R info pages ... >> updating '/usr/share/info/dir' ... >> make[1]: Leaving direc...

Dear All, I have posted the following "HELP" recently, and seems like no response afterwards. Anyway, I try to make it short again here: As instrcuted from the Samba3-HOWTO.pdf Ch 18.4.2: [root@samba3 var]# net rpc trustdom establish DomainA Password: Could not connect to server "DomainA-PDC" Trust to domain DomainA established Then, a workstation (WinXP SP2) had

Hi, I am trying to write a simple interpreter. I am trying to generate LLVM IR for assignment operation. The code for the generation part looks like this llvm::Value* codeGenSymTab(llvm::LLVMContext& context) { > printf("\n CodeGen SymTab \n"); > Value *num = ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt64Ty(context), aTable.value, > true); > Value *alloc = new

Has anyone seen this before, and know what is happening? USER at HOST:~/asterisk/agx-ast-addons# ./build.sh -- Configuring done -- Generating done -- Build files have been written to: /root/asterisk/agx-ast-addons [ 11%] Building C object CMakeFiles/app_devstate.dir/app_devstate.o Linking C shared module dist/app_devstate.so [ 11%] Built target app_devstate [ 22%] Building C object

..., label %.lr.ph <http://lr.ph/>, label >>>>> %._crit_edge* >>>>> *}* >>>>> >>>>> As you can see, at the end of BB <label>4 and BB<label>7 there are >>>>> "add", "icmp" and "br" instrcutions to check the boundary. I understand >>>>> this is for the correctness. However, I would expect the loop unrolling can >>>>> change my code to something like this: >>>>> >>>>> *void foo( int n, int array_x[])* >>>>> *{* >&...

This patch implements a checker to detect instructions which should be paravirtualized instead of direct writing raw instruction. This patch does rough check so that it doesn't fully cover all cases, but it can detects most cases of paravirtualization breakage of hand written assembly codes. Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata at valinux.co.jp> Cc: "Luck, Tony"

This patch implements a checker to detect instructions which should be paravirtualized instead of direct writing raw instruction. This patch does rough check so that it doesn't fully cover all cases, but it can detects most cases of paravirtualization breakage of hand written assembly codes. Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata at valinux.co.jp> Cc: "Luck, Tony"

Cool, that worked. New patch attached... Cheers, Gary Evan Cheng wrote: > Just cast both values to const TargetRegisterClass*. > > Evan > > On Jul 10, 2008, at 7:36 AM, Gary Benson wrote: > > Evan Cheng wrote: > > > How about? > > > > > > const TargetRegisterClass *RC = is64Bit ? &PPC:GPRCRegClass : > > > &PPC:G8RCRegClass; >

PPCTargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter has a reference to the current MachineFunction for other purposes. Can you use MachineFunction::getRegInfo instead? Dan On Jul 8, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Gary Benson wrote: > Would it be acceptable to change MachineInstr::getRegInfo from private > to public so I can use it from > PPCTargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter? > >

Hi Evan, Evan Cheng wrote: > This does not patch cleanly for me (PPCISelLowering.cpp). Can you > prepare a updated patch? This should work, though I won't have access to my test box now until next Thursday so no guarantees :) Cheers, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/ -------------- next part -------------- Index: lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelLowering.h

Hi Gary, This does not patch cleanly for me (PPCISelLowering.cpp). Can you prepare a updated patch? Thanks, Evan On Jul 10, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Gary Benson wrote: > Cool, that worked. New patch attached... > > Cheers, > Gary > > Evan Cheng wrote: >> Just cast both values to const TargetRegisterClass*. >> >> Evan >> >> On Jul 10, 2008, at 7:36

Just cast both values to const TargetRegisterClass*. Evan On Jul 10, 2008, at 7:36 AM, Gary Benson wrote: > Evan Cheng wrote: >> How about? >> >> const TargetRegisterClass *RC = is64Bit ? &PPC:GPRCRegClass : >> &PPC:G8RCRegClass; >> unsigned TmpReg = RegInfo.createVirtualRegister(RC); > > I tried something like that yesterday: > > const

Evan Cheng wrote: > How about? > > const TargetRegisterClass *RC = is64Bit ? &PPC:GPRCRegClass : > &PPC:G8RCRegClass; > unsigned TmpReg = RegInfo.createVirtualRegister(RC); I tried something like that yesterday: const TargetRegisterClass *RC = is64bit ? &PPC::GPRCRegClass : &PPC::G8RCRegClass; but I kept getting this error no matter how I arranged it: