search for: instrcution

I want to create a clean .rpm package for R built with MKL and ICC. I follow Fedora instrcutions[0] to create the package. As a base, I use the R-3.2.2.src.rpm. I am left with this error: ------------------------------------------ installing R info pages ... updating '/usr/share/info/dir' ... make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILD/R-3.2.2/doc/manual' + mv...

...unc i64 %indvars.iv.next.2 to i32* * %exitcond.2 = icmp ne i32 %lftr.wideiv.2, %n* * br i1 %exitcond.2, label %.lr.ph <http://lr.ph/>, label %._crit_edge* *}* As you can see, at the end of BB <label>4 and BB<label>7 there are "add", "icmp" and "br" instrcutions to check the boundary. I understand this is for the correctness. However, I would expect the loop unrolling can change my code to something like this: *void foo( int n, int array_x[])* *{* * int j = n%3;* * int m = n - j;* * for (int i=0; i < m; i+=3){* * array_x[i] = i;* * ar...

...i32* > * %exitcond.2 = icmp ne i32 %lftr.wideiv.2, %n* > * br i1 %exitcond.2, label %.lr.ph <http://lr.ph/>, label %._crit_edge* > *}* > > As you can see, at the end of BB <label>4 and BB<label>7 there are "add", > "icmp" and "br" instrcutions to check the boundary. I understand this is > for the correctness. However, I would expect the loop unrolling can change > my code to something like this: > > *void foo( int n, int array_x[])* > *{* > * int j = n%3;* > * int m = n - j;* > * for (int i=0; i < m;...

On 09/07/2015 06:16 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > I want to create a clean .rpm package for R built with MKL and ICC. I > follow Fedora instrcutions[0] to create the package. As a base, I use > the R-3.2.2.src.rpm. > > I am left with this error: > > ------------------------------------------ > installing R info pages ... > updating '/usr/share/info/dir' ... > make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/poisonivy/rpm...

..._________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: ? http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Hi, I think the trick is to download trunk version from svn (see voip-info.org for instrcution). Regards

...%lftr.wideiv.2, %n* >>> * br i1 %exitcond.2, label %.lr.ph <http://lr.ph/>, label %._crit_edge* >>> *}* >>> >>> As you can see, at the end of BB <label>4 and BB<label>7 there are >>> "add", "icmp" and "br" instrcutions to check the boundary. I understand >>> this is for the correctness. However, I would expect the loop unrolling can >>> change my code to something like this: >>> >>> *void foo( int n, int array_x[])* >>> *{* >>> * int j = n%3;* >>>...

For someone that wants to begin securing his or her network. What would be the starting point ? I guess in sort of a check list format. I mean as of now Im not administering a network. But in the old company I used to work for. Security was a big problem there were no polices in place. And in what ways can one reduce the amount of work it take to keep up with securing and monitoring a diversed

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote: > On 09/07/2015 06:16 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: >> I want to create a clean .rpm package for R built with MKL and ICC. I >> follow Fedora instrcutions[0] to create the package. As a base, I use >> the R-3.2.2.src.rpm. >> >> I am left with this error: >> >> ------------------------------------------ >> installing R info pages ... >> updating '/usr/share/info/dir' ... >> make[1]: Leaving dire...

Dear All, I have posted the following "HELP" recently, and seems like no response afterwards. Anyway, I try to make it short again here: As instrcuted from the Samba3-HOWTO.pdf Ch 18.4.2: [root@samba3 var]# net rpc trustdom establish DomainA Password: Could not connect to server "DomainA-PDC" Trust to domain DomainA established Then, a workstation (WinXP SP2) had

Hi, I am trying to write a simple interpreter. I am trying to generate LLVM IR for assignment operation. The code for the generation part looks like this llvm::Value* codeGenSymTab(llvm::LLVMContext& context) { > printf("\n CodeGen SymTab \n"); > Value *num = ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt64Ty(context), aTable.value, > true); > Value *alloc = new

Has anyone seen this before, and know what is happening? USER at HOST:~/asterisk/agx-ast-addons# ./build.sh -- Configuring done -- Generating done -- Build files have been written to: /root/asterisk/agx-ast-addons [ 11%] Building C object CMakeFiles/app_devstate.dir/app_devstate.o Linking C shared module dist/app_devstate.so [ 11%] Built target app_devstate [ 22%] Building C object

..., label %.lr.ph <http://lr.ph/>, label >>>>> %._crit_edge* >>>>> *}* >>>>> >>>>> As you can see, at the end of BB <label>4 and BB<label>7 there are >>>>> "add", "icmp" and "br" instrcutions to check the boundary. I understand >>>>> this is for the correctness. However, I would expect the loop unrolling can >>>>> change my code to something like this: >>>>> >>>>> *void foo( int n, int array_x[])* >>>>> *{* >...

...cr.kr = + */ + +/* for intrinsics + * ssm psr.i + * rsm psr.i + * mov = psr + * mov = ivr + * mov = tpr + * mov cr.itm = + * mov eoi = + * mov rr[] = + * mov = rr[] + * mov = kr + * mov kr = + * ptc.ga + */ + +/************************************************************* + * define paravirtualized instrcution macros as nop to ingore. + * and check whether arguments are appropriate. + *************************************************************/ + +/* check whether reg is a regular register */ +.macro is_rreg_in reg + .ifc "\reg", "r0" + nop 0 + .exitm + .endif + ;; + mov \reg = r0...

...cr.kr = + */ + +/* for intrinsics + * ssm psr.i + * rsm psr.i + * mov = psr + * mov = ivr + * mov = tpr + * mov cr.itm = + * mov eoi = + * mov rr[] = + * mov = rr[] + * mov = kr + * mov kr = + * ptc.ga + */ + +/************************************************************* + * define paravirtualized instrcution macros as nop to ingore. + * and check whether arguments are appropriate. + *************************************************************/ + +/* check whether reg is a regular register */ +.macro is_rreg_in reg + .ifc "\reg", "r0" + nop 0 + .exitm + .endif + ;; + mov \reg = r0...

...MTFSF, + /// ATOMIC_LOAD_ADD, ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP, ATOMIC_SWAP - These + /// correspond to the llvm.atomic.load.add, llvm.atomic.cmp.swap + /// and llvm.atomic.swap intrinsics. + ATOMIC_LOAD_ADD, ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP, ATOMIC_SWAP, + /// LARX = This corresponds to PPC l{w|d}arx instrcution: load and /// reserve indexed. This is used to implement atomic operations. LARX, @@ -160,10 +165,6 @@ /// indexed. This is used to implement atomic operations. STCX, - /// CMP_UNRESERVE = Test for equality and "unreserve" if not true. This - /// is...

PPCTargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter has a reference to the current MachineFunction for other purposes. Can you use MachineFunction::getRegInfo instead? Dan On Jul 8, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Gary Benson wrote: > Would it be acceptable to change MachineInstr::getRegInfo from private > to public so I can use it from > PPCTargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter? > >

...MTFSF, + /// ATOMIC_LOAD_ADD, ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP, ATOMIC_SWAP - These + /// correspond to the llvm.atomic.load.add, llvm.atomic.cmp.swap + /// and llvm.atomic.swap intrinsics. + ATOMIC_LOAD_ADD, ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP, ATOMIC_SWAP, + /// LARX = This corresponds to PPC l{w|d}arx instrcution: load and /// reserve indexed. This is used to implement atomic operations. LARX, @@ -160,10 +165,6 @@ /// indexed. This is used to implement atomic operations. STCX, - /// CMP_UNRESERVE = Test for equality and "unreserve" if not true. This - /// is...

Hi Gary, This does not patch cleanly for me (PPCISelLowering.cpp). Can you prepare a updated patch? Thanks, Evan On Jul 10, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Gary Benson wrote: > Cool, that worked. New patch attached... > > Cheers, > Gary > > Evan Cheng wrote: >> Just cast both values to const TargetRegisterClass*. >> >> Evan >> >> On Jul 10, 2008, at 7:36

Just cast both values to const TargetRegisterClass*. Evan On Jul 10, 2008, at 7:36 AM, Gary Benson wrote: > Evan Cheng wrote: >> How about? >> >> const TargetRegisterClass *RC = is64Bit ? &PPC:GPRCRegClass : >> &PPC:G8RCRegClass; >> unsigned TmpReg = RegInfo.createVirtualRegister(RC); > > I tried something like that yesterday: > > const

Evan Cheng wrote: > How about? > > const TargetRegisterClass *RC = is64Bit ? &PPC:GPRCRegClass : > &PPC:G8RCRegClass; > unsigned TmpReg = RegInfo.createVirtualRegister(RC); I tried something like that yesterday: const TargetRegisterClass *RC = is64bit ? &PPC::GPRCRegClass : &PPC::G8RCRegClass; but I kept getting this error no matter how I arranged it: