Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "inseption".
Did you mean:
inception
2020 Sep 09
2
[PATCH] klcc: Remove the need for bash
...@true
>>
>> $ make-3.81/make
>> make: command: Command not found
>
> Eh, what?
well command can be either a shell built-in or an external program,
right? but both are posix required [0]?
So that's a bit odd, also, wouldn't shell sh do a double shell? Shell
inseption? I'm not super familiar with make though, especially ancient
ones :p
[0] https://www.unix.com/man-page/posix/1p/command
>
> ? checks with gmake 3.81? indeed.
>
> But no, this isn?t correct. You just do this instead:
>
> $(info take1: $(shell sh -c 'command -v ls'...
2020 Sep 08
3
[PATCH] klcc: Remove the need for bash
Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-07-25 at 10:59 +0200, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
>> Currently, in the entire klibc bash is only used to identify the path of
>> the perl binary. It is doing so using the bash built-in 'type' function,
>> which is POSIX compliant according to [0], but the option -c is not.
>>
>> By using