search for: inquirement

Nadav (or anyone who is familiar with the loop vectorizer), Does the current loop vectorizer inquire about the SIMD capabilities of the target architecture when it decides whether it is profitable to vectorize a loop? I am asking this because I would like to have loop vectorization disabled for targets that don't support SIMD instructions (for example, standard mips32). Loop vectorization

Hi Nadav, On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Akira! > > > > > Does the current loop vectorizer inquire about the SIMD capabilities of > the target architecture when it decides whether it is profitable to > vectorize a loop? > > Yes, it uses a cost model to determine the profitability of vectorization. > At the

Hi Akira! > > Does the current loop vectorizer inquire about the SIMD capabilities of the target architecture when it decides whether it is profitable to vectorize a loop? Yes, it uses a cost model to determine the profitability of vectorization. At the moment only x86 provides the necessary hooks that are needed for calculating the costs. We may need to change the cost defaults to

On 3 January 2013 21:53, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > > I am asking this because I would like to have loop vectorization > disabled for targets that don't support SIMD instructions (for example, > standard mips32). > > Loop vectorization bloats the code size and prolongs compilation time > without any improvement to performance for such targets. >

On Jan 3, 2013, at 2:05 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > Isn't the vectorizer disabled by default? The loop vectorizer is now enabled by default. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130103/4645b2e8/attachment.html>

On Jan 3, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 3 January 2013 22:09, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > The loop vectorizer is now enabled by default. > > I thought that was just a temporary arrangement to get the feel for it, not to actually have it on all the time (next release). Is it just for -O3 or lower too? The plan it

I am looking for the binary rw1051. I have some code that will only run in version 1.5.1 and I need to install the old binary code. Is there a repository for previous R versions? Regards, Ernesto Calvo [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I've been running dovecot for awhile (about 18 months now) and I am very happy with it. I am currently planning an upgrade for the office server and I am wondering how is 1.0 going? Is it stable enough for production? I read a thread in the list from may 5th talking about the stability, and it seemed pretty decent. Anyways just looking for a bit of feedback on the evolution of 1.0

Is there a way to ask asterisk from a shell script if its connection (SIP) is valid to another system. Lets say for example to cisco call manager? Thanks, Jerry

The title is "Microsoft cerebrates fifteen years of poor security". But it's about more than Microsoft's security. It talks about buffer overflows, memory separation, OpenBSD's data "canary", etc. I think it's a good read for anyone interested on this kind of stuff. http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=11108 Santos

Dear all, Is there any standard statistical terminology describing the points beyond a confidence region? Obviously, the "outlier" is improper here. Please help me if you happens have the info. Thanks you very much for your kindly help. Best wishes, Zhiqiu [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On 3 January 2013 22:09, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > The loop vectorizer is now enabled by default. > I thought that was just a temporary arrangement to get the feel for it, not to actually have it on all the time (next release). Is it just for -O3 or lower too? This can cause problems, for instance on ARMv7, the default is that NEON is present, but Tegra2 doesn't

I am inquiring about setup of the SWAT utility I have installed Red Hat 7.0 with samba installed during the initial setup of Redhat. I have two network cards installed in my Server and I am connected to the internet via a Cable Modem. When I try to start SWAT netscape displays the message that it cannot find the local host on port 90. I have downloaded the book over samba and I have also tried to

Dear R News, I am inquiring whether the articles that are published in the 'R News' have undergone a peer-review/refereeing process, for the purpose of reporting the academics publications here at the University of Sydney to the Australian Government. Thank you for your assistance. Regards Glenn Glenn Howell| Faculty Research Assistant FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS

Hi, Would just like to inquire if anyone here has a setup of asterisk to send traffic to AS5400 connected to an SS7-PRI.? this is more of a AS54 question, as i've been reading and i always stumble upon PGW2200 as a requirement to handle SS7 signaling on the AS54. Has anyone able to send calls from asterisk to an as 54 with SS7-PRI without PGW2200? TIA Regards, Nhadie --------------

I have been looking for a way from the dialplan to inquire if there are any members in a queue. So what I want to do is if no users are members of a queue then I can send the call to a given extention. I have the queue setup all that is working. Just need to be able to send the call to a certain user if no-one is logged into the queue. How do I do that? Thanks Jerry

Well.. okay. Only printers. I am still having issues (pains, actually) getting my pritner shares to work from either Linux OR Windows 2000. One of the things I see here is that the majority of users use CUPS as the printing daemon. From my previous Unix experieince, I have gravitated towards BSD as my printing daemon. Could this be the reason I am having trouble> Does Samba work better with

In hvm enviroment, acpi failed. why? centos5.1 =================================================== [root@hvm001 ~]# xm dmesg __ __ _____ _ ____ ___ ____ _ ____ \ \/ /___ _ __ |___ / / | |___ \ / _ \___ \ ___| | ___| \ // _ \ \047_ \ |_ \ | | __) |_| (_) |__) | / _ \ |___ \ / \ __/ | | | ___) || |_ / __/|__\__, / __/ | __/ |___) | /_/\_\___|_| |_| |____(_)_(_)_____| /_/_____(_)___|_|____/

Hi All, We've been working on enhancing LLVM's instrumentation based profiling by adding indirect call target profiling support. Our goal is to add instrumentation around indirect call sites, so that we may track the frequently taken target addresses and their call frequencies. The acquired data has uses in optimization of indirect function call heavy applications. Our initial findings

Hello, I'm new to this list, but I noticed a post from March 30th inquiring about the build scripts for the official CentOS7 AMIs. I'm also interested in this; I'm tasked with (unfortunately) spinning up some VMs in our corporate VMWare environment that are "as close as possible" to the official CentOS7 AMIs. I could attempt to reverse-engineer them and figure out all of the