search for: inherent

...sions/4.2/Resources/library/Rcpp/include/RcppCommon.h:168: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.2/Resources/library/Rcpp/include/Rcpp/internal/r_coerce.h:255:7: warning: 'sprintf' is deprecated: This function is provided for compatibility reasons only. Due to security concerns inherent in the design of sprintf(3), it is highly recommended that you use snprintf(3) instead. [-Wdeprecated-declarations] ::sprintf(buff, "%02x", from); ^ /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk/usr/include/stdio.h:188:1: note: 'sprintf' has been explicitly mark...

...ected by a counter. Consider the following snippet of invalid IR: define i32 @foo() nounwind { entry: %time = call i32 @time(i32* null) nounwind %cmp = icmp eq i32 %time, 1234567890 br i1 %cmp, label %exit, label %entry exit: ret i32 0 } declare i32 @time(i32*) nounwind Is the problem really inherent to the entry block, or is it rather inherent to the use of the phi instruction from the entry block? Thanks for your time. Félix Le 2010-07-08 à 02:27:03, Alistair Lynn a écrit : > Hello Félix- > > Consider the following snippet of IR: > > define i32 @foo(i32 %n) nounwind { &gt...

I'm having another play with LLVM using the OCaml bindings for a forthcoming OCaml Journal article and I have a couple of remarks: Firstly, I noticed that the execute engine is very slow, taking milliseconds to call a JIT compiled function. Is this an inherent overhead or am I calling it incorrectly or is this something that can be optimized in the OCaml bindings? Secondly, I happened to notice that JIT compiled code executed on the fly does not read from the stdin of the host OCaml program although it can write to stdout. Is this a bug? Many thank...

...IR >> constructs. >> > > FWIW, while i agree with the general point, i wouldn't use this example. > Because we pretty much still suffer to this day because of it (both in AA, > and devirt, and ...) :) > We can't always even tell fields apart > > > Is it inherent to the infrastructure, i.e. using metadata instead of first > class IR construct or is it just a “quality of implementation” issue? > > Not to derail this conversation: IMHO, At some point there is no real difference :) Because otherwise, everything is a QOI issue. IE if it's super...

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Jon Harrop <jonathandeanharrop at googlemail.com> wrote: > Firstly, I noticed that the execute engine is very slow, taking milliseconds > to call a JIT compiled function. Is this an inherent overhead or am I calling > it incorrectly or is this something that can be optimized in the OCaml > bindings? What is the signature of the function you are calling? When calling a generated function via runFunction, the JIT handles some common signatures but if it doesn't recognize the...

...I was suggesting your ISEL attempt to use a predicated > instruction where possible for performance. The whole reason for using predication is performance. In the presence of traps, the select form should never even be created in the first place. > The point about pattern complexity is an inherent difficulty w/any > intermediate IR.  We do quite well pattern matching complicate > constructs in existing backends - x86 SIMD comes to mind - and I'm > unconvinced that predication is somehow inherently more difficult. Our experience tells us otherwise. Intrinsics, and ultimately fi...

...ree with the general point, i wouldn't use this >>> example. >>> Because we pretty much still suffer to this day because of it >>> (both in AA, and devirt, and ...) :) >>> We can't always even tell fields apart >> >> Is it inherent to the infrastructure, i.e. using metadata instead >> of first class IR construct or is it just a “quality of >> implementation” issue? >> >> >> Not to derail this conversation: >> >> IMHO, At some point there is no real difference :) >> >&...

...x, but not sure if that applies to syslinux.efi as well. Is there anything I can do from DHCP or the config file that will change that timeout so my downloads can complete? Or is there a way to have syslinux.efi use something other than TFTP to get the kernel/initrd files (FTP, HTTP, etc)? TFTP is inherently slow across the WAN since every packet has to be acknowledge before the next one can be sent. Thanks, Matt -- Matt Bateman Sr. Network Architect XO Communications 503-972-6835

On Mon, 2020-08-03 at 19:17 +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > That would be the same as killing scp? Better that... than having an inherently insecure scp... or at least make it absolutely clear and rename it to i[nsecure]scp. If the core functionality of a program (which is here probably the "secure") is no longer given, then it's IMO better to rather cause breakage (at least for old clients), than to keep going. Chee...

Over the last couple of weeks I have seen a thread about remotely rebooting SIP phones from Asterisk. Is there something inherent in Asterisk that *requires* that SIP phones to be rebooted in a particular scenario, or is it just so that phones can pickup new firmware and/or configuration from their boot server? TIA.

...uot;worst case" latency (in terms of Speex frames) that the jitter buffer algorithm will incur? We're trying to determine the worst case hard number. Sorry for unclear question below; what I was trying to ask is that given a worst case latency (which I'm asking in the first question) inherent in using the jitter buffer feature, is that any way in the code to reduce the latency? Thanks. Regards, Andy ----- Original Message ---- From: Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> To: Andy Ngo <ndno72-speex@yahoo.com> Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008...

I decided to take a stab at 6601421 dladm set-linkprop should support multiple -p options along with some related linkprop fixes, but when I looked into dladm.c, was surprised to find that "dladm_parse_props()" is called from do_create_aggr and do_create_vlan in addition to the expected (by me, at least) do_create_vnic *linkprop functions. What happened here? Why do we pass in

Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> writes: >> Masking has advantages even in the default non-trapping fp >> environment: It is not uncommon for fp hardware to be slow on >> denormal values. If you take the operation + select approach, >> spurious computation on denomals could occur, slowing down the >> program. > Why?  If you're backend has

...d why it is not coalescing the copies. > I discovered a curious phenomenon: The copies are necessary because TwoAddressInstructionPass commutes the second add. When I suppress the commute, the movs disappear and the code became optimal. It seems the two-address commuter is either buggy or inherently short-sighted/simple-minded and paints itself into a corner. How do you recommend I approach this problem? G

I just installed C7 on a new computer and despite Simple Scan being installed as part of C7, I have not been able to get it to recognize my Canon scanner connected to a USB port. I did have it running on another computer with C7 so there should not be any inherent issues. On a lark I installed gscan2pdf and sane-backends-drivers-scanners and sane-find-scanner found it: found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x1908 [CanoScan]) at libusb:001:010 I perused my notes for the old computer but did not see I installed any additional software to get it...

On 09.03.2012 15:09, yahoo2 wrote: > Uncompressed FLAC is called WAV. really? ;-) the problem is that there is no standarized way to store metadata in a WAVE file, like with FLAC tags / vorbis comments in flac files.... greets KoS

...idea > of popping in a CD and having the files show up as FLAC would be an > appealing one to users. Yes, this is a challenge. I am the author of mp3fs, and a major challenge was to predict final file size accurately. This is why mp3fs only supports CBR mp3 and not VBR mp3 or ogg (which is inherently VBR). Is there a 'CBR' flac encoding mechanism? > I suppose another alternative would be to hack on cddafs or one of its > cousins to add FLAC support. I hadn't heard of cddafs before, looks kinda neat. Unfortunately, it looks like a kernel-mode filesystem which would be impo...

I am hoping someone will tak up this chalenge (I am new to R) I have inheritied an R script but need to change it. The script currently includes hardcoded file locations on lines 12,166 and 167. I need to modify this script to allow the folder to be passed as a command line argument to Rscript.exe Can anybody help please? Regards, Ian http://www.nabble.com/file/p25924237/My_script.R

...last 2 coefficient estimates are "NA". When I view the summary, it indicates that 2 coefficients are "not defined because of singularities". I am using the command: mod <- lm(y ~ ., data = volumes[,3:22]) I am fairly new to R so I don't know if my issue is something inherent to R or my modeling approach. Any insight would be most appreciated... Thanks in advance

...ive in most ways >> in helping me solve problems. >> > > Jesus Christ .. do we really have to start ANOTHER systemd thread. Yes. > These lists are for providing USEFUL information to CentOS users .. Let's get some information that might be useful: Are binary logfiles an inherent part of systemd? If so, equating systemd with the devil would seem appropriate. My expectation is that it is not. Is the aforementioned dearth of information an inherent part of systemd? If so, equating systemd with the devil would seem appropriate. My expectation is that it is not. The evil of...