search for: infringes

Does the reason Theora is relatively safe from patent infringement lawsuit have more to do with it actually not being encumbered, or is it because its use is decentralized? For example, FreeType is not patent-free, nor is Linux, yet they succeed because on the one hand, they are open source, and those who maintain them do not guarantee anything regarding patents, it is up to each individual user

Hi David, Sorry for the delay getting back to you, been a bit buried: On Oct 19, 2015, at 10:12 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: >> The TL;DR version of this is that I think we should discuss relicensing all of LLVM under the Apache 2.0 license and add a runtime exception clause. See below for a lot more details. > > I agree that this is a problem.

I've dug down as far as I could on www.uspto.gov for anything remotely close to what is going on with Verizon and all searches end with only two possibilities in regards to what is going on. So unless the patent was issued to someone else and Verizon bought it, these are the only two possible patents this case could be based on... US 7,142,646 B2 Voice mail integration with instant

Just thought I'd put my two cents in about the trademark infringement issue. I ran the true SSH for about a month some time back. When I learned of OpenSSH, I dropped the official product and built OpenSSH. Quite frankly, OpenSSH is a superior package. It is cleaner, commercially unencumbered, and with its affiliation to the OpenBSD team, I feel more secure about the code quality. When

Hi, We are in the business of developing/productizing Multimedia codecs for embedded systems. Recently, Vorbis has gained good popularity. We are also developing it. But we face few problems related to patents. Vorbis claims to be patent free. Is there any particular search made for possible patent infringements and corresponding report published? We need to convince our customers sometime

Hi radeonhd, nouveau, mesa3d developers, Firstly, thank you all very much for all the important work you do. I've been working as a part-time developer on the "Spring RTS" project (open-source game engine) which runs on linux (and other os). Some time ago I tried the engine on the open-source ATI radeonhd driver, which I understand to be partly based on mesa 3d, and all textures

...rote: > I apologize if this has been answered previously, but why is DSA being > removed from LLVM? I ask because I am currently using the latest CVS > versions of LLVM and DSA. There are two reasons for doing this: 1. DSA is currently only used by llvm-poolalloc. 2. More seriously, DSA infringes on certain patents held by Microsoft, regarding unification-based points-to analysis. While DSA isn't linked into llvm-gcc by default and thus is currently only accessible through opt, the inclusion of known-to-infringe code in the main LLVM repository makes some people/organiz...

I received the following e-mail in response to an e-mail I had sent to SSH communications questioning the wisdom of their requesting OpenSSH to change it's name. Contained in the message is that statement that SSH Communications did not exert their trademark rights earlier becuase it's only recently that OpenSSH has become more visible. In the United States, this would invalidate the

On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 01:26:15PM -0500, rj coleman wrote: > > > > On Dec 24, 2018, at 10:42 AM, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: > > > >> On 12/24/18 7:21 AM, vsnsdualce at memeware.net wrote: > >> Debian is not ruled by the men who actually write the software, but instead women. > > > > *snip* > > > > Can we

...;d argue, pretty strongly, it's not the most likely case for LLVM. > We’d still be in the situation where a malicious contributor could: > > 1. Spin up a new company to act as a NPE > 2. Transfer ownership of the relevant patent(s) to the NPE > 3. Contribute code to LLVM that infringes the patent, safely abiding by > the terms that they’re licensing all of the patents that they own. > 4. Watch the NPE sue everyone and laugh. > There are literally attempts at loopholes one could play with literally every legal scenario ever, no matter what is done. I'll go further: I...

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> </head> <body style="font-size: 12px; background-image: url("http://202.131.101.226/stationary/xcelris.jpg"); margin: 100px 0px 0px 10px; color: rgb(0,

Hello ! I'm very interested in btrfs development and I have general questions about it. Please accept my apologizes if they are dumb as I'm new to this area, and I just want to learn.. 1. Like the btrfs name implies (b-trees fs..) I guess that it works basically like WAFL (and ZFS), is that right ? 2. Are there any big differences between btrfs-wafl-zfs or only small ones ? 3. NetApp

-- snip -- Had the patch been against the actual g729 libraries the case would have been clear. Now, the patch is against asterisk to make it interoperate with the g729 libarary and this may or may not be non-infringing. However, the distribution of the g729 libraries themselves are almost certainly infringing. There is also the possibility that the patch to asterisk may be ruled a

hey, i am a big unicorn fan -- i have been running it in production since late 2010, and it is happily handling (literally) billions of backend requests for a popular facebook game. i also <3 unicorns in general ..... so i decided to make an awesome t- shirt, sporting the "Angry Unicorn" that you may remember from github error pages. i hope some of you might like it as well:

Hi, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > > What of this can LLVM's optimizer optimize away for me? > > Not much. LLVM won't really change your memory layout. The features > which did perform dramatic memory reorganization were excised from the > source tree due to patent infringement issues. (They remain in the > repository on a branch for UIUC research.) These were also

Dear all, This is a little bit off-topic, but I was wondering if anyone has any informed opinion on whether data (ie. a dataset) is copyrightable? Hadley

...cerned, and the general consensus from the developers is that Qualcomm automatically discloses patent claims against codecs whether they apply or not, and that opus does not infringe on the Qualcomm patents. The big unknown for me is Huawei. I have not heard anything from anyone on whether opus infringes on the Huawei patent or not. On the IETF list, discussing IP issues was discouraged, but I hope now that the Xiph list is active again the developers can give us some insight on that. John Ridges On 7/31/2012 12:21 PM, celt-dev-request at xiph.org wrote: > Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:43:15 +1...

I'd like to address several issues raised by people in relation to my notice of the ssh(R) trademark to the OpenSSH group. Also, I would like to make a proposal to the community for resolving this issue (included at the end). First, I'll answer a number of questions and arguments presented in the discussion. > "the SSH Corp trademark registration in the US is for a logo

I've tried emailing this to centos-tm at redhat.com , but mailer-daemon at googlemail.com sent me this Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: centos-tm at redhat.com Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain redhat.com by mx1.redhat.com. [209.132.183.28]. The error that

Sprint Nextel is sueing vonage, voiceglo and theglobe.com for infringing on VoIP patents. Sprint Nextel claims to have about 100 patents on VoIP technologies. Does anyone know which ones this article is talking about, and if so does asterisk have any of those features? The reason I am asking is that the article is vague, Vonage uses a fairly standard codec set, I dont know about the others.