search for: infowest

...machine login, it appears, which is just "John". However, what is really weird, is the "failed" on the "client out" line, but then the proxy went ahead and proxied to the storage server. Here's some output from debuggage: dovecot: Feb 19 16:15:56 Info: auth(mail.infowest.com): client in: AUTH 1 NTLM service=POP3 lip=204.17.177.60 rip=209.33.215.142 resp= dovecot: Feb 19 16:15:56 Info: auth(mail.infowest.com): client out: CONT 1 dovecot: Feb 19 16:15:56 Info: auth-worker(mail.infowest.com): sql(John, 209.33.215.142): query: SELECT a.clearpas...

syncPEOPLE (of which myself and Duane Johnson make up a part) would like to brag about the newest TM bundle, now with .DMG and patent pending (or not) QuickDrag installer technology. NEW FEATURE: command-option-p (without selection): Inline Partial Edit Mode When inside a view file that contains one or more ?render :partial? statements, hit ?command-option-p? without any selection and your

...f LLVM, likely obtained in binary form. If you have an objection to the LLVM trunk requiring CMake 3.15.0 in order to build I'd like to understand that objection so that we can take it into account as we move forward. Thanks, -Chris > On Nov 4, 2019, at 7:23 AM, Neil Nelson <nnelson at infowest.com> wrote: > > Here is how I would make the argument for the latest version of cmake. > > The latest version of cmake addresses a number issues we face in building LLVM including the following. > > [list the justifications] > > We realize this using of the latest ver...

I run matrix multiplication code with both the approaches o3 at clang and o3 at opt. clang o3 is about 2.97x faster than opt o3. On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 8:24 AM Neil Nelson <nnelson at infowest.com> wrote: > is_sorted.cpp > bool is_sorted(int *a, int n) { > > for (int i = 0; i < n - 1; i++) > > if (a[i] > a[i + 1]) > return false; > return true; > } > > https://blog.regehr.org/archives/1605 How Clang Compiles a Functionhttps://blog....

...t I don’t really know anything about ninja). Maybe this may help somebody to figure out what could be happening and hopefully help me to narrow the issue? I honestly am totally lost on what to try next. This is kind of ridiculous. Thanks > On 6 Jul 2019, at 23:49, Neil Nelson <nnelson at infowest.com> wrote: > > Joan, > > Just completed a good clang compile built from a mostly vanilla Xubuntu 19.04 VM, installed the llvm-needed Ubuntu packages, downloaded a new copy of llvm using the noted llvm install page, configured using > > cmake -G Ninja -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=...

...> make a difference here. > > -- > Mehdi > > > >> >> >> *From:* Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 7, 2020 12:01 AM >> *To:* Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> >> *Cc:* Neil Nelson <nnelson at infowest.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> *Subject:* [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake >> version >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 12:48 PM Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> >>...

...happening and hopefully help me to narrow the issue? I honestly am totally lost on what to try next. This is kind of ridiculous. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 6 Jul 2019, at 23:49, Neil Nelson <nnelson at infowest.com <mailto:nnelson at infowest.com>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Joan, >>>>>> >>>>>> Just completed a good clang compile built from a mostly vanilla Xubuntu 19.04 VM, installed the llvm-needed Ubuntu packages, downloaded a...

...re out what could be happening and >>> hopefully help me to narrow the issue? I honestly am totally lost on what >>> to try next. This is kind of ridiculous. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> On 6 Jul 2019, at 23:49, Neil Nelson <nnelson at infowest.com> wrote: >>> >>> Joan, >>> >>> Just completed a good clang compile built from a mostly vanilla Xubuntu >>> 19.04 VM, installed the llvm-needed Ubuntu packages, downloaded a new copy >>> of llvm using the noted llvm install page, configured...

...he definition of “supported” being used here is default system packages and not third party repos that claim to work for that system. From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev Sent: Saturday, April 4, 2020 2:11 PM To: Neil Nelson <nnelson at infowest.com> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:48 PM Neil Nelson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: 'Supported...

...utable = lmtp -L idle_kill = 0 process_limit = 0 process_min_avail = 0 protocol = lmtp service_count = 0 inet_listener lmtp { address = <backend_server_ip> port = 2525 } } protocol lmtp { info_log_path = /var/log/dovecot-lmtp.log postmaster_address = postmaster at infowest.com mail_plugins = quota }

.... We can always require that the project be built with the current release candidate of CMake. That doesn’t mean that we should. From: Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 12:01 AM To: Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> Cc: Neil Nelson <nnelson at infowest.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 12:48 PM Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com<mailto:ctetreau at quicinc.com>> wrote: Every additional dependency that we force the user to...

...ts will be useful, Thanks! Cassidy ### Part of my dovecot.conf that might be useful: login_process_per_connection = yes login_processes_count = 3 login_max_processes_count = 512 auth_verbose = yes auth_debug = yes auth_debug_passwords =yes auth_worker_max_count = 400 auth mail.infowest.com { mechanisms = plain passdb sql { args = /usr/local/etc/dovecot-sql.conf } userdb static { args = uid=5000 gid=5000 home=/dev/null } user = root # Number of authentication processes to create count = 10 ## dovecot-sql.conf driver = mysql connect =...

...is may help somebody to figure out what could be happening and >> hopefully help me to narrow the issue? I honestly am totally lost on what >> to try next. This is kind of ridiculous. >> >> Thanks >> >> >> On 6 Jul 2019, at 23:49, Neil Nelson <nnelson at infowest.com> wrote: >> >> Joan, >> >> Just completed a good clang compile built from a mostly vanilla Xubuntu >> 19.04 VM, installed the llvm-needed Ubuntu packages, downloaded a new copy >> of llvm using the noted llvm install page, configured using >> >>...

...Mehdi > > > > > From: Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com <mailto:joker.eph at gmail.com>> > Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 12:01 AM > To: Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com <mailto:ctetreau at quicinc.com>> > Cc: Neil Nelson <nnelson at infowest.com <mailto:nnelson at infowest.com>>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Subject: [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 12:48 PM Chris Tetreau...

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:22 AM David Greene via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > hameeza ahmed via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > > > Hello, > > I want to study the individual O3 optimizations. For this I am using > > following commands, but unable to replicate O3 behavior. > > > > 1.

...t ninja). > > Maybe this may help somebody to figure out what could be happening and > hopefully help me to narrow the issue? I honestly am totally lost on what > to try next. This is kind of ridiculous. > > Thanks > > > On 6 Jul 2019, at 23:49, Neil Nelson <nnelson at infowest.com> wrote: > > Joan, > > Just completed a good clang compile built from a mostly vanilla Xubuntu > 19.04 VM, installed the llvm-needed Ubuntu packages, downloaded a new copy > of llvm using the noted llvm install page, configured using > > cmake -G Ninja -DLLVM_ENABLE_PR...

It may be that the 'not' operator is not being found under bash at : 'RUN: at line 12';   not Perhaps this is would be better as the more commonly seen '!'. Neil Nelson On 9/13/19 12:12 PM, Neil Nelson via llvm-dev wrote: > > Toward the end of testing.9.0.0-rc4.log. > > Testing: 0 .. 10.. 20. > FAIL: Clang Tools :: clang-tidy/run-clang-tidy.cpp (17057 of

cmake -G Ninja -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS="debuginfo-tests" -DLLVM_USE_LINKER=lld -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE="Release" -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=X86 -Wno-dev ../llvm &> ../../cmake.log in cmake.log -- Targeting X86 CMake Error at /home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/debuginfo-tests/CMakeLists.txt:30 (message):   Cannot run debuginfo-tests without python 3 installed python3

Neil Nelson wrote: > When I was managing IT and the servers for a small company that > needed to be live 24/7 we used the latest Ubuntu LTS version > because we needed rock-solid performance as best we could get. > The software in the LTS version is tested and used by a large > user base with necessary updates and so we expected to have high > reliability. I used to work for

This is a recent desktop. Xubuntu 19.10 Compiling for 10.0.0 clang and llvm. See below. For this test, running 14 processors in a gui VM. The cores are hyperthreaded, processors are twice the cores, but all the cores before the run are showing negligible activity. compile_commands.json has 3022 entries. The ninja compile run lasted 7 minutes and 43 seconds with 99% all processor usage