search for: inexorable

Hi all, I want to use libvirtd and polkit to create simple access restricitions for incoming TLS connections. libvirtd.conf: > ... > auth_tls = "sasl" > access_drivers = [ "polkit" ] > ... > tls_no_verify_certificate = 1 SASL and TLS in combination is already working without any faults. After activating access_drivers, the setup breaks, cause the access is

Hello, I have run into troubles trying to jump from 1.0alpha5 (basically running smoothly) to 1.0beta5 and/or beta7. I am seeing errors such as the following set for nearly every user. dovecot: May 01 16:21:02 Info: IMAP(joeuser): Disconnected: Logged out dovecot: May 01 16:21:02 Error: IMAP(joeuser): file ioloop.c: line 153 (timeout_remove): assertion failed: (*timeout != NULL) dovecot: May

...ut one of the issues they're running into is support for Blocks in FreeBSD. On the one hand, they could try and back-port the gcc changes from http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/gcc/gcc-5646 and solve the problem that way or, on the other hand, they could just continue FreeBSD's inexorable march towards Clang and get the blocks support as part of compiler-rt. The only problem seems to be that the build support for Blocks in compiler-rt isn't wired up yet, which came as something of a surprise to all involved given that people have been talking about Clang and Blocks sinc...

...es they're running into is support for > Blocks in FreeBSD. > > On the one hand, they could try and back-port the gcc changes from http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/gcc/gcc-5646 >  and solve the problem that way or, on the other hand, they could > just continue FreeBSD's inexorable march towards Clang and get the > blocks support as part of compiler-rt.  The only problem seems to be > that the build support for Blocks in compiler-rt isn't wired up yet, > which came as something of a surprise to all involved given that > people have been talking about Clang and...

...ng into is support for >> Blocks in FreeBSD. >> >> On the one hand, they could try and back-port the gcc changes from http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/gcc/gcc-5646 >> and solve the problem that way or, on the other hand, they could >> just continue FreeBSD's inexorable march towards Clang and get the >> blocks support as part of compiler-rt. The only problem seems to be >> that the build support for Blocks in compiler-rt isn't wired up yet, >> which came as something of a surprise to all involved given that >> people have been talking...

people appear to born to compute. NY Escort (http://www.nycescortasiangirl.com) The numerical skills of children develop so early and so inexorably that it is easy to imagine an internal clock of mathematical maturity guiding their growth. NY Escorts (http://www.nycescortasiangirl.com) Not long after learning to walk and talk, they can set the table with impress accuracy---one knife, one spoon,

Dear R People: Do we say that R is a programming language or a programming environment, please? Which is correct, please? Thanks in advance, Sincerely, Erin -- Erin Hodgess Associate Professor Department of Computer and Mathematical Sciences University of Houston - Downtown mailto: erinm.hodgess at gmail.com

...for >>> Blocks in FreeBSD. >>> >>> On the one hand, they could try and back-port the gcc changes from http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/gcc/gcc-5646 >>> and solve the problem that way or, on the other hand, they could >>> just continue FreeBSD's inexorable march towards Clang and get the >>> blocks support as part of compiler-rt. The only problem seems to be >>> that the build support for Blocks in compiler-rt isn't wired up yet, >>> which came as something of a surprise to all involved given that >>> people h...

----- "Ben M." <centos at rivint.com> wrote: > Does this appear to be a sound procedure? I have one inline question. I read your version of the procedure and it looks like you want to skip the pvmove. That's fine, but it means more downtime (an unreliable estimate is one minuted per GB). In that case, you don't even need the snapshot. You won't need a point in time

dear samba users and developers, i'd like to put to you a proposal for your respectful consideration: it is an idea that i believe has strategic merit for the open source community and OS users as a whole. these words are chosen carefully and the reasons will become apparent later: that i begin as an example. as you are no doubt aware, there have been some seriously damaging (but not