search for: inexorably

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "inexorably".

2016 Jan 04
2
libvirtd and polkit: internal error: No Unix Process ID
Hi all, I want to use libvirtd and polkit to create simple access restricitions for incoming TLS connections. libvirtd.conf: > ... > auth_tls = "sasl" > access_drivers = [ "polkit" ] > ... > tls_no_verify_certificate = 1 SASL and TLS in combination is already working without any faults. After activating access_drivers, the setup breaks, cause the access is
2006 May 01
1
timeout_remove and "Timeout leak" problems
...ildir) is on a NetApp NFS file server.) While I tweaked settings for the differences between the 1.0a5 conf file and the beta conf file, things are fundamentally the same between them. The other critical element to this is that imap-login sessions are being left around and the load average climbs inexorably. (It reached 50 on this dual dual-core machine before I killed things off and started the daemon from scratch.) This occurs for users using a whole array of clients: Thunderbird, SquirrelMail, Eudora, Apple Mail, etc. How can I track this down or can someone please help me figure out what is hap...
2009 Sep 15
2
[LLVMdev] Status of blocks runtime in compiler-rt?
Hi folks, So, various folks are in the process of porting Grand Central Dispatch to FreeBSD (c.f. http://libdispatch.macosforge.org and http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/libdispatch-dev for mailing list discussion on the topic) and are making good progress, but one of the issues they're running into is support for Blocks in FreeBSD. On the one hand, they could try and back-port
2009 Sep 15
0
[LLVMdev] Status of blocks runtime in compiler-rt?
Good day, I been working on the CMake build system (which is nice and portable) + code clean ups over the whole Compiler-RT software suit. I recently added Blocks to the CMake build system but there is some ugly looking warnings I need to fix up in the Blocks code which I have not had time to look into yet. N.B. The CMake build system is not complete yet due to my lack of time, however I am still
2009 Sep 16
3
[LLVMdev] Status of blocks runtime in compiler-rt?
The Blocks language and implementation specifications are checked into clang/docs. More generally, on Mac OS X, the blocks runtime is linked into the C library ("libSystem"), and available to the entire OS. Clients that create blocks may implicitly get compiler-generated calls to some of the runtime functions, and the developer may also make explicit calls to, e.g.,
2011 Sep 20
0
children's numerical skills
people appear to born to compute. NY Escort (http://www.nycescortasiangirl.com) The numerical skills of children develop so early and so inexorably that it is easy to imagine an internal clock of mathematical maturity guiding their growth. NY Escorts (http://www.nycescortasiangirl.com) Not long after learning to walk and talk, they can set the table with impress accuracy---one knife, one spoon, one fork, for each of the five chairs. NY Asian E...
2010 Nov 21
2
a philosophy R question
Dear R People: Do we say that R is a programming language or a programming environment, please? Which is correct, please? Thanks in advance, Sincerely, Erin -- Erin Hodgess Associate Professor Department of Computer and Mathematical Sciences University of Houston - Downtown mailto: erinm.hodgess at gmail.com
2009 Sep 22
0
[LLVMdev] Status of blocks runtime in compiler-rt?
Hi Jordan, I've committed my changes to hook up the BlocksRuntime/ subdirectory of compiler-rt, using CMake. The cmake build process is documented at <http://llvm.org/docs/CMake.html > More specifically, to use this support on FreeBSD, for example, you would do: 1) Install cmake (<http://www.cmake.org/>), add it to your PATH 2) Check out the source code for llvm and clang
2009 Oct 25
2
Move Windows within an LV to another pv safely
----- "Ben M." <centos at rivint.com> wrote: > Does this appear to be a sound procedure? I have one inline question. I read your version of the procedure and it looks like you want to skip the pvmove. That's fine, but it means more downtime (an unreliable estimate is one minuted per GB). In that case, you don't even need the snapshot. You won't need a point in time
2004 Dec 15
7
[proposal] Samba Software Foundation
...ich progress can be made. i'm fed up with the arbitrary way in which critical open source projects aren't, if you look at it critically, really making any _significant_ progress in _significant_ leaps or bounds to further _real_ business needs and problems, at a time when windows is moving inexorably further up its own behind, and people are just ... lapping it up because they don't BELIEVE they have any CHOICE [or they actually don't: e.g. where is the Open Source Passport clone for Mono to use?]. windows is getting more insidious, providing more and more "features" enabled...