search for: ineffect

...a message from a folder in one account, to a folder in the other account 2. See that the newly created message file is -rw------- If a message is moved between folders on the _same_ account, however, the group permissions are preserved (ie not masked off). So it seems that the umask option is ineffective when the imap daemon creates a new maildir message file. Thanks, Steve. -- BOFH excuse #400: We are Microsoft. What you are experiencing is not a problem; it is an undocumented feature. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type:...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10163 Summary: rsync -X is ineffective when setting owner/group Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: mluscon at r...

Hello, Using some Windows applications with WINE on Puppy/Toutou LINUX 4.31, I noticed that links created in the pages of my Outliners (TreeDBNotes, KeyNotes) are ineffective. Idem for links to websites in the help menus of any Windows applications. What's going wrong and what could be done to solve this problem? Thank you! Regards.

Hi, I have some IR module from random generation (mostly ineffective instructions). It has a function with void return, and two function arguments where one is a reference. Therefore, I expect every instruction not altering the value at the 2nd arguments address should be ineffective. Here is the function definition (see below for full ll): define void @_Z27ent...

Your observation would be right if you are using --checksum which you shouldn't be. Otherwise, unless you are using --whole-file rsync will use its differential algorithm to compare the files. If you are using --progress you will see it step through the file at a faster speed than the network is capable of. If there is no difference then rsync will go very fast to 100% then do any metadata

Do not use --checksum. It has an extremely limited use case. Normally it is much slower than simply re-copying everything. --checksum means checksum every file on both ends (even files that only exist on one end) before doing anything else even if doing so causes a timeout failure. --checksum is the only part of rsync stupid enough to leave one end idle potentially for hours. On 03/14/2018

Hi all, I found some issues during my testing of "loop unrolling" capabilities of LLVM's opt. Seems like LLVM generates slower code with -O3 since it wrongly decides to unroll a simple loop. With option -Os, no loop unrolling, the output looks well. Code:

Kevin Korb via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> (Mi 14 Mär 2018 14:52:55 CET): > Your observation would be right if you are using --checksum which you > shouldn't be. Otherwise, unless you are using --whole-file rsync will > use its differential algorithm to compare the files. If you are using > --progress you will see it step through the file at a faster speed than Ok,

Hi, how does rsync work if it compares two very huge files on two distinct hosts (rsync uses a networked connection, via SSH)? Some observation seems to indicate, that rsync first reads (and checksums?) the remote (destination) side, then, if finished, it reads (and checksums?) the local (source) side and then starts transferring the delta if done with the comparison of these two files on both

Running rsync 2.6.9-1.el4.rf on CentOS 4.4 client and remote server. Backing up user data from 2 different clients using following: su - $HOSTID -c 'rsync -azr --timeout=600 --log-file=$DEBUGFILE --log-file-format="%o %f %b %l %i" --stats --delete --bwlimit=$BANDWDT --rsh="ssh -P ____" $STAGE $TARGET:$TARGETDIR' Using "bytes sent"/"literal data"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm very happy with Dovecot and wish the best for its continued development. It's a true testament to brilliant componentised design and Unix philosophy. Configuration made easy because of the way the file is parsed and a single point of startup make it ridiculously straightforward (and lovely) to administer. But of course, we all

Hi, I set a preference order of the codecs to my sip.conf [general] port = 5060 ; Port to bind to bindaddr = 0.0.0.0 ; Address to bind to context = default ; Default for incoming calls of not registered phones disallow = all allow = g729 allow = g723 allow = alaw allow = ulaw Connected a 'Sipura SPA' sip phone to asterisk with g729 as its preferred codec. Problem: asterisk cannot make

According to the smb.conf man page, the "dos filemode" parameter will allow a user who is not the owner of a file to affect permissions changes on a file or folder provided he has write access to that object. This does not appear to be the case. Users with write access via user or group ACEs receive an "Access denied" error when attempting to make ACL changes via windows,

I am trying to control the behavior of the SANN method in optim (R 2.14.1) via control$temp. In my toy tests it works; in my real use, it doesn't. As far as I can tell my code with different temp values is loaded; I even traced into the function that calls optim and verified temp had the value I had set. Could the fact that I have NaN's coming back from the objective function be a

...filter_destination_recipient_limit = 1 does not work in this case so if this issue is not possible to fix by configuration an alternate solution like making dovecot delete duplicate messages by message ID would be a viable option. I have +vnd.dovecot.duplicate plugin enabled but it seems to be ineffective. Any other tips for a workaround? Thank you. Claude

Hi Folks: **Off Topic** Those interested in clinical trials may find the following of interest: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/19/health/research/19trial.html It concerns the ethicality of randomizing those with life-threatening disease to relatively ineffective SOC when new "biologically targeted" therapies "appear" to be more effective. While the context may be new, the debate, itself, is not: Tukey wrote (or maybe it was talked -- I can't remember for sure) about this about 30 years ago. I'm sure many other also have done...

According to vt-d specs, the addr in IOTLB invalidation descriptor should be 4K page aligned. Signed-off-by: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@Intel.com> diff -r 0455d8317631 xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c Thu Jun 28 18:43:28 2012 +0100 +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c Wed Jul 11 08:43:24 2012 +0800 @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static int

...isophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > This Summer I was working on LTO and Rafael mentioned to me that debug info > is not lazy loaded, which was the cause for the insane resource usage I was > seeing when doing LTO with debug info. This is likely the reason that the > lazy loading was so ineffective for your debug build. > > Rafael, am I remembering this right/can you give more information? I expect > that this will have to get fixed before pitching LLD as a turnkey LTO > solution (not sure where in the priority list it is). In the case of LTO, there were two main issues. * Du...

...eports 0KB) .1087907444.7006_1.mail.domain.com,U=1,W=42566 (reports 0KB) Is there any known fix for this problem? I realize that Linux filenames and conventions don't necessarily play nice with Windows, but perhaps someone here as experience in getting this to work. Google has thus far proved ineffective in finding a solution! Also, since I'm new to these mailing lists, how do I reply to someone who as replied to my post? Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

...r all users, not on a per user basis or without writing out thousands of sieve files to users directories. Thank you. On 2017-06-15 13:33, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 6/15/2017 om 12:19 PM schreef Luescher Claude: >> I have +vnd.dovecot.duplicate plugin enabled but it seems to be >> ineffective. Any other tips for a workaround? >> > > Enabling that extension does nothing by itself. You need to add a > corresponding rule to your Sieve script. > > Also, that is the deprecated name for that extension. It is explained > fully here: > > https://tools.ietf.o...