Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "indvarssimplifi".
Did you mean:
indvarssimplify
2004 Jun 21
4
[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform
Is it ok sending this results for FreeBSD5.1 at daily/weekly based to this
mail list?
Now results.
Big improvement in llvm tests results from last test result sended.
New regressions:
Regression.Assembler.ConstantExprFold : FAIL , expected PASS
Regression.CodeGen.Generic.2004-04-09-SameValueCoalescing: FAIL ,
expected PASS
Regression.Transforms.PRE.basictest : FAIL
2005 Feb 06
0
[LLVMdev] gmake check failure on FreeBSD
FAIL:
/usr/home/jeffc/llvm/obj/../test/Regression/Transforms/IndVarsSimplify/exit_value_tests.llx:
br label %Loop
br bool %exitcond, label %Out, label %Loop
br label %Loop
br bool %exitcond, label %Out, label %Loop
br label %Loop
br bool %exitcond, label %Out, label %Loop
2004 Jun 20
0
[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform
Thanks Vladimir. That's great! Glad you got it working.
BTW, the failures you're seeing have been experienced by Chris and I as
well. Chris is diligently working on making the LLVM processing more
consistent so he track down the problem. A week ago or so, these tests
passed at 100%.
Reid.
On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 15:50, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote:
> In attached file.
>
> Vladimir
2004 Jun 20
2
[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform
In attached file.
Vladimir
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test2004_06_20.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 88488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040620/98042f01/attachment.obj>
2004 Jun 21
0
[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote:
> Is it ok sending this results for FreeBSD5.1 at daily/weekly based to this
> mail list?
A better list for it would be the llvmbugs list for now.
I beginning to think that we need a new test results mailing list. We
have 3 instances of the nightly tester going now (x86/linux, sparc, ppc)
and may have more in the future. The nightly tester
2007 Sep 22
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.1 Pre-release Version 2 Online
LLVMers,
The LLVM 2.1 pre-release version2 is now available:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version2/
You can help test this pre-release by doing one of the following:
1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0
binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make
TEST=nightly report).
2) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the llvm-gcc4.0 source.
2008 Feb 27
4
[LLVMdev] llvm/test: suffix or operands invalid for `push'
Hi all again,
llvm is failing the 2006-11-30-NoCompileUnit and 2006-11-30-Pubnames
tests on me.
-m32 and --disable-multilib didn't change the outcome. Did I get the
command wrong? I tried
jo at kurier:~/Delta/llvm/test$ CFLAGS=--multilib make check
See below for a transcript of the failed check.
What next?
Regards,
Jo
-- snip --
jo at kurier:~/Delta/llvm/test$ make check
llvm[0]:
2006 Apr 13
3
[LLVMdev] Re: Creating Release 1.7 Branch at 1:00pm PDT
Here's what's left on Linux (GCC 4.1.0), after all updates that went
into the branch:
Running /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/dg.exp ...
FAIL: /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/2004-02-12-
LargeAggregateCopy.c.tr:
gccas: /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/lib/VMCore/Function.cpp:266: unsigned
int llvm::Function::getIntrinsicID() const: Assertion `0 &&
2009 Feb 23
1
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release2 available for testing
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Aaron Gray <
aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <
> anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:
>
>>
>> Actually its [configure-stage3-intl] where its hanging.
>>
>> This can easily be due to inline FP math in the stdlib headers. For
>> example - I had to
2008 Jun 10
3
[LLVMdev] DejaGNU test fixes
Hi all,
while writing a testcase thate needed to do a grep containg {, I found that
the DejaGNU test framework didn't handle those very well. It's a bit of a fuss
to escape accolades properly, but most of all the framework seemed to silently
ignore errors in the escaping (and just not run the command then). See [1].
Fixing the framework resulted in 80 of the tests failing. I spent the
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers,
The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1
release. There are 2 ways you can help:
1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0
binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make
TEST=nightly report).
2) Download
2007 Oct 10
1
[LLVMdev] make check fails on latest SVN version
Hi,
I have run make check in llvm/test, and I got a FAIL.
Also first time I run the test I ran out of space on /tmp (which is a
1G sized tmpfs).
See output below. Please let me know if I should try any patches, etc.
llvm[0]: Running test suite
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/edwin/llvm-svn/llvm/test'
( ulimit -t 600 ; ulimit -d 512000 ; \