search for: incongruous

...de in lib/Transforms/Scalar/InstructionCombining.cpp: cerr << "WARNING: While resolving call to function '" << Callee->getName() << "' arguments were dropped!\n"; If you're using LLVM as a static compiler, this warning is a bit incongruous, because it's not formatted in the same way as warnings from the front end, and it isn't suppressed by -w. If you're using LLVM as a JIT, it seems completely wrong for any optimisation pass to use cerr like this. So should it be removed, or downgraded to DOUT, or something? There are...

On Oct 18, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: >> >> I recommend, this being the case, to replace 'webkit' with 'experimental'. Having webkit in the name implies some dependence on webkit, and there is none. Plus, this functionality will be used by outside projects as soon as it lands in trunk, and I suspect that having webkit in the

dear all, i'm trying to reproduce an spss-anova in R. It is an 2x3x3 repeated measures desingn with repeated contrasts. In R i've coded a contrast matrix for all factors and made a split in the aov summary - but I can't get the repeated interaction contrasts. The output from SPSS looks like this: TaskSw * CongNow * CongBefore: SS df Mean Square F Sig. 1 vs. 2 1 vs. 2 1 vs. 2

...a solved problem, yet. I acknowledge that CRAN packages exist which fix this by replacing file.exists(), but it seems more elegant to me to fix the problem in R itself. R Core goes to great extremes to accommodate Windows users and the refusal to make file.exists() work in a cross-platform way is incongruous. I often do have slashes on the end of directory names being tested. Now that I understand the meaning of ?file.exists, I need to wrap the name being checked in a slash-deleter ## delete trailing slashes dts <- function(name) gsub("/$", "", name) if(!file.exists(dts(any_na...

...r/InstructionCombining.cpp: > > cerr << "WARNING: While resolving call to function '" > << Callee->getName() << "' arguments were dropped!\n"; > > If you're using LLVM as a static compiler, this warning is a bit > incongruous, because it's not formatted in the same way as warnings > from the front end, and it isn't suppressed by -w. > > If you're using LLVM as a JIT, it seems completely wrong for any > optimisation pass to use cerr like this. > > So should it be removed, or downgraded to DO...

On Oct 18, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Oct 18, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > >>> >>> I recommend, this being the case, to replace 'webkit' with 'experimental'. Having webkit in the name implies some dependence on webkit, and there is none. Plus, this functionality will

Dear friends, a newbie here. we have two webservers, a and b, both of them with rsync installed. We would like to rsync one directory on one server with another directpory on another server. What I do is to go to one of the server (server a) as root using ssh, navigate to the directory, and write rsync -avz username@serverb:directory/ ./ But it does not work. Am I doing something

On Oct 18, 2013, at 2:59 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 18, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > >> On Oct 18, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: >> >>>> >>>> I recommend, this being the case, to replace 'webkit' with 'experimental'.

...ut "-i" has currently the same result for the case presented in this email thread). I haven't tested the Linux-based installers with the bootsecfile option; for the exe and com installers, this syntax (that currently seems to mean "instead") is confusing and inconsistent/incongruous with the expected usage/goal of --install. Independently of the matter of the "-f" option, isn't the above a more consistent / logical behavior (for the Windows- and DOS-based installers, at least, if not for all of them)? Regards, Ady.

...range = 50001-60000 > > # Use home directory and shell information from AD > winbind nss info = rfc2307 Also does anyone have any idea why 10001 was chosen as the start of the range? Since the default starting ID on the DC (both a Microsoft server and Samba DC) is 10000, this seems incongruous. As a related issue (depending on the answer to the above), if anyone has wiki-editing privileges, and knows the RFC2307 "ropes", perhaps you could fix the AD_member_server page which shows what seems to me to be a poor choice of ranges for the basic smb.conf file. https://wiki....

On Oct 18, 2013, at 10:09 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> >> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Andrew Trick < atrick at apple.com > >> wrote: >> >> >> >> The initial documentation and patches name these intrinsics in a >> "webkit" namespace. This clarifies their current purpose

----- Original Message ----- > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Andrew Trick < atrick at apple.com > > wrote: > > > > The initial documentation and patches name these intrinsics in a > "webkit" namespace. This clarifies their current purpose and conveys > that they haven't been standardized for other JITs yet. If someone on > the on the dev

...seem to have presented the GHC ABI use case (and see just below about UBSan). Do you know of any other use cases? > we might as well use it in UBSan as > opposed to something which is going to be strictly slower. > Below you use UBSan's use case as a motivating example, which seems incongruous to this "might as well use it in UBSan" attitude. Without having evaluated alternatives as being "too slow" for UBSan, I don't think that UBSan's use case should be used to drive this proposal. > > > > 2) Allowing GHC's tables-next-to-code ABI [1] to be...

....cpp: >> >> cerr << "WARNING: While resolving call to function '" >> << Callee->getName() << "' arguments were dropped!\n"; >> >> If you're using LLVM as a static compiler, this warning is a bit >> incongruous, because it's not formatted in the same way as warnings >> from the front end, and it isn't suppressed by -w. >> >> If you're using LLVM as a JIT, it seems completely wrong for any >> optimisation pass to use cerr like this. >> >> So should it be remo...

On Oct 18, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Oct 18, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > >>> >>> I recommend, this being the case, to replace 'webkit' with 'experimental'. Having webkit in the name implies some dependence on webkit, and there is none. Plus, this functionality will

libupload: Use previous TFTP OK status definition FTBFS: com32/hdt/hdt-dump.c:227:39: error: ?TFTP_OK? undeclared (first use in this function) Signed-off-by: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> Should we trim "ERR_" off the definition or change all of the places this macro is used? Trimming means we have two possible spots with incongruent definitions (bit order difference).

Lately I've tried running some games under Snow Leopard, 10.6.4 to be precise, most of them being pre-Direct X 8 games, mainly for nostalgia reason. Most of these games had no big problems running under Ubuntu 10.10 32bit, and being used to run Wine under Mac Os for some legacy work-related application, I thought It would have been pretty straightforward to run such games under Snow Leopard.

Hi, I've just installed libao-1.1.0 on a new Debian install. I also have alsa 1.0.27.1 installed. Debian is running under VirtualBox 4.2.12 under OSX 10.6.8, on a MacBookPro. libao does not work in stereo for the sampling rate of 44100, but it does for 8000, 11025, 22050and 48000. When I send it two channel output at a sampling rate of 44100, the result includes what sounds like skips,

Hi all! I have a problem configuring rsync as daemon: This is my rsync.conf: log file = /var/log/rsync.log list = yes uid = nobody gid = nobody secrets file = /etc/rsyncd.secrets [section] comment = Great stuff from remote.acme.com path = /home/repos auth users = marco hosts allow = * hosts deny = * This is my /etc/rsyncd.secrets marco:marco This is the secrets file permission: [root@server

...e same result for the case presented in > this email thread). I saw this too. > I haven't tested the Linux-based installers with the bootsecfile > option; for the exe and com installers, this syntax (that currently > seems to mean "instead") is confusing and inconsistent/incongruous with > the expected usage/goal of --install. It won't work on Linux as the saving .bss behavior is DOS/Windows only. > Independently of the matter of the "-f" option, isn't the above a more > consistent / logical behavior (for the Windows- and DOS-based > installers,...