search for: incompatibily

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "incompatibily".

Did you mean: incompatibilty
2005 May 19
0
Re: [OT] FOSS or Freedomware? -- WAS: pronunciation/Red Hat
.... I also want to differentiate between "good" vendors who maintain proprietary standards over time, because they value their customers and their own property, and those who purposely don't even maintain internal, proprietary standards, and purposely change file formats regularly, and incompatibily. The former I call "Commerceware." The later is what I call intentional Hostageware: - Hostageware (unmaintainable source, unmaintainable standard) Any software can become Hostageware. If it is unmaintained, eccentric, etc..., that's a risk to the data contained in/produced by t...
2023 Jul 18
1
change language at console
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > I would start by trying LANGUAGE=en , e.g. More specifically, you can use en_US or en_GB. Rich [...] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
2006 Jul 27
1
MANAGESIEVE patch v2
Hello Timo, Dispite the heat out here, I managed to come up with a new version of the managesieve patch for dovecot-1.0rc2: - Fixed the bug (missing CRLF) in the authenticate command - Modified the sieve storage library making the interface much less crude. - The scripts put on the server using the putscript command are now checked before they are accepted. - The reported SIEVE capability is
2004 Jan 17
3
Wish list
Kevin, I was glad to see your list. Some of the items were reasons for creating some of the functions in Hmisc. summarize and mApply in conjunction with llist handle labeling of output - this is actually quite tricky and the Hmisc solution isn't perfect. Dropping unused factor levels by default (with easy override) is an old battle and I agree with you completely that for everyday data
2008 Feb 28
14
Upgrading to 7.0 - stupid requirements
In http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html says Updating Existing Systems > An upgrade of any existing system to FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE constitutes > a major version upgrade, so no matter which method you use to update > an older system you should reinstall any ports you have installed on > the machine. This will avoid binaries becoming linked to inconsistent > sets