search for: incollect

...hat do not contain all required fields? A suggestion: it would be nice if bibtex provided some extractor functions for bibentry fields. > bib1 <- read.bib("C:/localtexmf/bibtex/bib/timeref.bib") ignoring entry 'Donoho-etal:1988' (line 40) because : A bibentry of bibtype ?InCollection? has to correctly specify the field(s): booktitle ... snipping other similar warnings ... > length(bib1) [1] 628 > > bib2 <- read.bib("W:/texmf/bibtex/bib/timeref.bib") ignoring entry 'Donoho-etal:1988' (line 57) because : A bibentry of bibtype ?InCollection? h...

The bibtex citations provided by citation() do not work all that well in cases where there is no printed document to reference: (1) A version field is needed, as the note field is required for other purposes, currently trying to sort out nuances that cannot be sorted out in the author list (author, compiler, implementor of R version, contributor, ...) and maybe giving a cross-reference to a book

...ever) and/or a range of pages. # Required fields: author or editor, title, chapter and/or pages, publisher, year. # Optional fields: volume or number, series, type, address, edition, month, note. validates_presence_of :title, :chapter, :pages, :publisher, :year end class InCollection < Publication # A part of a book having its own title. Required fields: author, title, booktitle, publisher, year. # Optional fields: editor, volume or number, series, type, chapter, pages, address, edition, month, note. validates_presence_of :title, :booktitle, :pub...

Dear list users, I need to learn about MCMC methods, and since there are several packages in R that deal with this subject, I want to use them. I want to buy a book (or more than one, if necessary) that satisfies the following requirements: - it teaches well MCMC methods; - it is easy to implement numerically the ideas of the book, and notation and concepts are similar to the corresponding R