search for: includernw

...vert from Rmd), it should issue > helpful error messages to tell the user to install R, or to install knitr > within R. By requiring to see R when being run by root/admin at install > time, it is making invasive assumptions about the user environment. > > It could be that the texlive-includernw package itself does not require > install time dependency fulfillment, and that this is something only the > Fedora texlive packager has mis-understood. Texlive packages don't require anything at build time, so Andreas has nothing to do with this issue. The description of his package cla...

Hello! I'm confused as to what the actual problem with includeRnw is? Is the problem that it relies on R-knitr? Before it would be withdrawn, may I be given an opportunity to fix said problem? includeRnw only invokes the already existing R installation, and should not affect any other global settings or affect the installation in any way. If this is the case...

...hoice of packages points to an injudicious editing of an rpm >> dependency list in some texlive package related to rmarkdown or similar. > > $ dnf repoquery --tree --whatrequires R-knitr > > texlive-scheme-medium installs texlive-collection-mathscience, which > installs texlive-includernw, which necessarily depends on R-knitr. Thanks for the analysis. I do not see that any other latex package in texlive-sceme-medium involves creating such havoc drawing in non-texlive packages. I appeal to Andreas Storvik Strauman to ensure that texlive-includernw is forthwith withdrawn from tex...

On Sat, 10 Nov 2018, Andreas Storvik Strauman wrote: > Hello! I'm confused as to what the actual problem with includeRnw is? Is > the problem that it relies on R-knitr? Before it would be withdrawn, may > I be given an opportunity to fix said problem? Yes, the problem is that it expesses an external dependence on anything outside texlive. On packaging systems (for me Fedora), this explicitly pulls in all o...

On upgrading my F28 to F29, I've found that R-core and a number of R packages: R-evaluate R-glue R-highr R-knitr R-magrittr R-markdown R-mime R-stringi R-stringr R-yaml are installed, although I only ever install R from source and always keep my Rs locally. So I don't use Fedora R rpms, but these were installed without my command. Something in texlive is doing this. A remedy is to

...ulprit. > However, the choice of packages points to an injudicious editing of an rpm > dependency list in some texlive package related to rmarkdown or similar. $ dnf repoquery --tree --whatrequires R-knitr texlive-scheme-medium installs texlive-collection-mathscience, which installs texlive-includernw, which necessarily depends on R-knitr. The solution is not to depend on texlive collections. Install texlive-scheme-basic instead, plus additional packages as you need them. I?aki > I'm reporting this here in case other Fedora users are puzzled to see > another R (or an rpm R) appearin...