search for: incestuously

Thanks Daniel, I'll do a debug build of LLVM (I guess that'll teach me) and step through it as soon as I'll find a power outlet. I'm calling getDependency on the load instruction, and it returns the store instruction. Suspiciously enough, calling invalidateCachedPointerInfo on load->getPointerOperand() does not cause my AA pass to be called again when I use getDependency (or

Hi all, I have a custom alias analysis pass that enforces that pointers from different address spaces do not alias, and I'm using MemoryDependenceAnalysis to, well, figure out dependence analysis. The AA pass is extremely simple, it only checks the address space of pointers, returns NoAlias if they're different, and delegates otherwise. It is the last alias analysis pass added to my

...ink that the personality-specific unwind tables were actually an ABI "artifact". I mean, let's say you compile a function in Visual Studio, the result is a function with some mangled symbol that other object code can make references through the linker. But the other object code never incestuously refers to the unwind tables of the function it calls, right? I'm speaking from the point of view of an implementor of a new programming language who wants to interoperate with C++. I've already got code that can decode the Microsoft RTTI info coming from C++ exceptions, and the pointers to...

On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 6:46 PM Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > > On May 1, 2015, at 12:31 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > *The atom model is not the best model for some architectures * > > > The atom model is a good fit for the llvm compiler model for all > architectures. There is a one-to-one mapping between llvm::GlobalObject >

> > There is no doubt that most security agencies have a long list of zero- >> day exploits in their toolbox - I would hazard to suggest that they >> wouldn't be doing their job if they didn't! But I seriously doubt they >> would commission exploitable code in something that is openly >> auditable. >> >> P. >> > > P., I used to think

Hi folks, is anybody using those two products together and can give me any advice on how to do this? My specific issue has been addressed in other posts before, but as nobody responded, it would just now be interesting if anybody at least uses those applications together successfully? greets Malte

...ality-specific unwind tables were > actually an ABI "artifact". I mean, let's say you compile a function in > Visual Studio, the result is a function with some mangled symbol that other > object code can make references through the linker. But the other object > code never incestuously refers to the unwind tables of the function it > calls, right? > > I'm speaking from the point of view of an implementor of a new programming > language who wants to interoperate with C++. I've already got code that can > decode the Microsoft RTTI info coming from C++ excepti...

After a long tale of sorrow and woe, my colleagues and I stand here before you defeated. The Itanium EH representation is not amenable to implementing MSVC-compatible exceptions. We need a new representation that preserves information about how try-catch blocks are nested. WinEH background ------------------------------- Skip this if you already know a lot about Windows exceptions. On Windows,