search for: improvement

Hello, I am having trouble with creating a simple bar chart using R. My file just consists of 1 column called reason. Within this column, there are 2 responses(Room for Improvement and Info entered is all relevant). My code for creating the charts is as follows: d <-read.table("C://project/graphs/reason.csv", sep=",", header=TRUE) pie(d$reason, labels=d$reason, main="Results") Here is my error: Error in pie(d$reason, labels = d$reason, main...

Hi, Im having trouble creating the following graph. Here is my code: library(plotrix) library(prettyR) female_improvement <-read.table("C://project/graphs/gender/breakdown/gender-improvement/female-improvement.csv", sep=",", header=TRUE) barp(rbind(rep(length(female_improvement$gender),2),freq(female_improvement$reason)[[1]]), ylab="22 Males participated in the survey", col=4:5,names.a...

The search on this forum should improve to improve the forum -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

On Fri, 25 May 2012 14:00:01 -0500, <theora-request at xiph.org> wrote: > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 19:26:18 +0200 > From: Raphael Canut <nhwcodec at gmail.com> > Subject: [theora] NHW codec - improvement of precision > To: theora at xiph.org > Message-ID: > <CAKE58qHqSsrgJP4OX++eetMmT2WTv=8ZvfXoou7bWjOnbUSrAQ at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hello, > > Just contact you quickly as I have improved precision of my codec (a...

...eciate any help in understanding how the rpart function is (exactly) computing the "improve" (which is given in fit$split), and how it differs when using the split='information' vs split='gini' parameters. According to the help in rpart.object: "improve, which is the improvement in deviance given by this split" >From what I understand, that would mean that the "improve" value should not be different when using different "split" switches. Since it is different, then I suspect that it is reflecting the impurity measure somehow, but I can't s...

Hi Francis, Thanks for getting back to me. Could you please provide more details about the problems you encounter with those tools and what improvements required to improve compact unwinding format? Most of my experience is in the mid end, but it is still surprising to me that an improved shrink wrap will break that many tools, considering the fact that gcc has a good shrink wrapping pass and shrink-wrap-separate pass. Also, if possible, would yo...

...Attributor. Again I want to consider whether some attribute deduction can help liveness (dis)provers. For example NoReturn, WillReturn can be improved. I am sure these 2 attributes do not cover all the cases as it is an undecidable problem. But I was wondering whether there is room for improvement in their deduction mechanism. 4. Can we optimize the attribute deduction algorithm to reduce compile time? 5. Is there any attribute that tells whether a function has side-effects (does it always gives the same output for the same input? Or does it affect some global variable...

Hi, When I look at the summary of an rpart object run on my data, I get 7 nodes but when I plot the rpart object, I get only 3 nodes. Should the number of nodes not match in the results of the 2 functions (summary and plot) or it is not always the same? Look forward to your reply, Carol -------------------------------------------- ?summary(rpart.res) Call: rpart(formula = mydata$class ~ ., data

...couple of comments: 1) The patch that improves encoding for all depths was proposed by Miroslav Lichvar <http://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=4eab6313cd2198b5647d925bdb3847590505fa21> 2) "Performance checks" graph posted by Martijn van Beurden reminded me that the decoding improvements for FLAC were made only for 32-bit x64 architecture (aka IA32). FLAC is multiplatform, so it make sense to mention this.

Hi, Sorry for bringing back such an old thread. I am interested in the latest status of the shrink wrapping pass in LLVM. I have found some active work back in 2017 from Francis Visoiu Mistrih and Kit Barton from the following links. However, it seems that all the work suddenly stops and the improvement for the existing shrink wrapping did not make it into the trunk. Is this work abandoned? https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-August/116131.html http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-May/112687.html https://reviews.llvm.org/D41765 Thanks, Jimmy -------------- next part ---------...

i think you should write more program . so that you can improve you ruby skills ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "ANIKET KADAM"; 发送时间: 2012年9月2日(星期天) 晚上9:52 收件人: "rubyonrails-talk"; 主题: Re: [Rails] Which Framework will improve my Ruby Skills? can you tell me which rubygems will improve my ruby skills On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:00 PM, ANIKET KADAM

Even though wine versions get released often and the weekly newsletters seem to report progress I get the impression that wine is not really improving. Of course it happens that some applications work with newer wine versions which didn't work with older ones, but at the same time old applications stop working. Is it only me that gets the impression that wine only changes over time, but

...eto Ueno. I’m interested in working on GSoC project, “Improve (function) attribute inference”. As far as I see [0] and related patches, you have already implemented algorithms for many of the deducible function attributes with the new framework “Attributor”. I doubt whether there is still room for improvement as a GSoC project. If there is, let me know. Thanks. Hideto Ueno [0] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-April/131483.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190403/72e8ce25/attachm...

...oming a jungle of R code and may do well with currating and editorial effort. This can not/should not be the task of a single person or small group of people. Using a crowd sourced method by implementing a wiki approach to the CRAN package repository would allow for the rapid editing, sorting and improvement of this impressive and precious resource, while also improving the accessibility, visibility and quality of individual packages. It would also bind the For example, such an interface would allow the cleaning up of the repository through the use of tagging of packages, using similar approaches to...

Dear r-help-list: I' got a question about the computation of the improve of a split. The following is an extract of an output of the summary of a tree: Node number 1: 600 observations, complexity param=0.007272727 predicted class=0 expected loss=0.1666667 class counts: 500 100 probabilities: 0.833 0.167 left son=2 (211 obs) right son=3 (389 obs) Primary splits: x4

...ll also target other large codebases). Our project will involve identifying new cold block patterns via static analysis in our workload, implementing detection of these patterns into the existing hot/cold splitting pass, and then benchmarking hot/cold splitting in our workload to see if there are improvements. Our eventual goal is to improve the ability of hot/cold analysis to detect cold blocks in these real-world workloads. Our plan is attached at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rGLcFpfVXnF7aS31dWnowd2y_BjJnRA-hj3cUt6MqZ8/edit?usp=sharing. Any feedback, input, or suggestion is welcome and highl...

Hi I want to pursue a project based to improve the existing KCoFI method which is the Control Flow integrity method for commodity os. Since KCoFI is a llvm based project I plan to undertake the project to improve the existing KCoFI method. Following are the improvements that I want to pursue: 1. To improve the call graph used in KCoFI. Implement a stronger call graph. 2. Port the KCoFI to another architecture such as ARM or x86-32. 3 .To replace KCoFI's SFI instrumentation with that found in Portable Native Client (PNaCL) Can anyone review my idea for the p...

On 6 August 2016 at 00:18, Michael Kuperstein <mkuper at google.com> wrote: > I agree that we can get *more* improvement with better cost modeling, but > I'd expect to be able to get *some* improvement the way things are right > now. Elena said she saw "some" improvements. :) > That's why I'm curious about where we saw regressions - I'm wondering > whether there's really a...

Hi Everyone, Here are my notes on the LLVM 1.7 release, which will go into the final release announcement. As Tanya mentioned, it has been far too long since the last release, and there have been a lot of CVS commits since Novemeber. :) I went through them all and pulled out some of the major improvements, which I've listed below. I'm certain that I have forgotten some things, so please let me know if I have and I'm happy to add it. I'm going to start working on the release notes now. If you're interested in helping out with the release, please take a look at Tanya's...

Hi I am trying to install vim-puppet for syntax highlight of puppet manifest file. I first installed vim-puppet and then vim. Then I ran "vim-addon-manager -w install puppet" I am still unable to see the colours on site.pp bala@WheezyMaster:~$ vim-addon-manager # Name User Status System Status editexisting removed removed justify