search for: implies

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4985 Summary: --list-only shows implied dirs even with --no-implied- dirs Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

I am simply trying to put 4 boxplots on the same plot, but I keep getting the "arguments imply differing number of rows" error. Here, I have two variables: a factor x of length 1762 (with 4 levels) and a numeric variable y of length 1762. How is it that my arguments imply differing numbers of rows? > length(x) [1] 1762 > length(y) [1] 1762 > is.factor(x) [1] TRUE >

Hi, I have gone through the rsync documentation and also tested same both --no-implied-dir and --keep-dirlinks options. My question is what is the difference between these options in below scenario? I have /foo/bar is the symlink to /foo/baz at source and same directory structure with symlink is there at destination. When I sync the data from /foo/bar/* with --relative option specified, I am

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3543 Summary: [ACL] rsync calls default_perms_for_dir on omitted implied dirs before ensuring they exist Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

...ut of course that wasn't useful without doing something about (1). Regarding (1), over at https://reviews.llvm.org/D26708#596610, David made the same point that it should be done in Clang. I can understand that, but I wonder whether having the concept of the 'fast' flag in the IR that implies all the other FMF makes sense? I'm not seeing a good reason for it, but since this is very new to me, I can easily imagine I'm missing the big picture. For example, in the LLVM IR (http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#fast-math-flags) the fast-math flags 'nnan', 'ninf', '...

I use rsync in a fairly complex scripted situation and am trying to figure out how to avoid changing ownership/permissions just on the directories specified on the command line (but operate normally for everything underneath). I've been using --relative --no-implied-dirs with some success in other situations, but here it still seems to try to chown the last path component of the

...ut of course that wasn't useful without doing something about (1). Regarding (1), over at https://reviews.llvm.org/D26708#596610, David made the same point that it should be done in Clang. I can understand that, but I wonder whether having the concept of the 'fast' flag in the IR that implies all the other FMF makes sense? I'm not seeing a good reason for it, but since this is very new to me, I can easily imagine I'm missing the big picture. For example, in the LLVM IR (http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#fast-math-flags) the fast-math flags 'nnan', 'ninf', '...

...g about (1). > > Regarding (1), over at https://reviews.llvm.org/D26708#596610 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D26708#596610>, David made the same point that it should be done in Clang. I can understand that, but I wonder whether having the concept of the 'fast' flag in the IR that implies all the other FMF makes sense? I'm not seeing a good reason for it, but since this is very new to me, I can easily imagine I'm missing the big picture. > > For example, in the LLVM IR (http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#fast-math-flags <http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#fast-math...

...only, or is mere increased precision also valid? unsafe algebra (A) > - allow for algebraically equivalent transformations that may > dramatically > change results in floating point. (e.g. reassociation) > [...] > Not all combinations make sense (e.g. 'A' pretty much implies all other > flags). > > Basically, I have the below semilattice of sensible relations: > A > S > I > N > A > F > Meaning that 'A' implies all the others, 'S' implies 'I' and 'N', etc. > Why does it make sense for S to imply I and...

Wayne, Attached is a patch worth of suggested man page improvements for --no-implied-dirs and --keep-dirlinks. I think new users would find my explanations clearer and more complete, although you may want to make additional changes. I regenerated rsync.1 and the patch includes changes to it, but my yodl is somewhat weird, so I suggest you run yodl again yourself. -- Matt McCutchen

Hi Team, I using the syntax as: data.df<- data.frame( city= c(rep(c("Delhi", "Bangalore","Chandigarh"),each=5)), population= c(4000:6000,3500:4300,3000:3200) ) But i am getting the error as arguments imply differing number of rows: 15, 3003. Tried searching google but could not understand & find the solution. Thanks, Shivi [[alternative HTML version

...m I think the potential confusion outweighs the potential benefit. I'm just one voice though. Peter ________________________________ > From: Sjoerd Meijer > Sent: 15 November 2018 14:15:26 > To: Peter Smith; Bruce Hoult > Cc: llvm-dev; nd > Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [RFC][ARM] -Oz implies -mthumb > > > > Yes, exactly this: > > > Sure, none of the cortex-m cores support ARM mode. Try cortex-a{5,7,8,9,15,53} etc and you'll see it works. > > Sorry for being a bit vague and unclear here: yes, I should have said cortex-a{5,7,8,9,15,53}. > I was just havi...

mydata <- read.table(textConnection(" Id cat1 location item_values p-values sequence a111 1 3002737 100 0.01 1 a112 1 3017821 102 0.05 2 a113 2 3027730 103 0.02 3 a114 2 3036220 104 0.04 4 a115 1 3053984 105 0.03 5 a118 1 3090500 106 0.02 8 a119 1 3103304

Hi there, I find myself writing a lot of similar required/subscribe parameters, for example in service definitions: package { whatever : ensure => latest } service { whatever: ensure => running, require => Package[ whatever ], subscribe => Package[ whatever ] } Am I doing this correctly, or does subscribe imply require so the require parameter here is unnecessary? Thanks

The manpage states: You may turn off one or more implied options by prefixing the option name with "no-". Not all options may be prefixed with a "no-": only options that are implied by other options (e.g. --no-D, --no-perms) or have different defaults in various circumstances (e.g. --no-whole-file, --no-blocking-io, --no-dirs). You may specify either

Why does --xattrs imply --perms (according to the man page)? Unlike --acls, --xattrs is not logically a superset of --perms (since system.* xattrs are ignored). I might conceivably want to copy some user xattrs that I set on my files while allowing the destination permissions to take the default value. Matt

Rusty, the patch "virtio: imply disable_cb on callbacks" is on your tree. I'd like to figure out how it works: for example: diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c @@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ static void blk_done(struct virtqueue *v /* In case queue is stopped waiting for more buffers. */

Rusty, the patch "virtio: imply disable_cb on callbacks" is on your tree. I'd like to figure out how it works: for example: diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c @@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ static void blk_done(struct virtqueue *v /* In case queue is stopped waiting for more buffers. */

4000:6000 gives you 4000, 4001, ..., 6000. I suspect you want population= c(seq(4000, 6000, length=5), seq(3500, 4300, length=5), seq(3000, 3200, length=5)) Bob On 20 September 2017 at 17:07, Shivi Bhatia <shivipmp82 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Team, > > I using the syntax as: > > data.df<- data.frame( > city= c(rep(c("Delhi",

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=863 Summary: Implied regression in errors Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: arm OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org ReportedBy: