search for: implemet

...ilto:asterisk-users- > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Troy Settle > Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 7:03 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] MAX PRI for single server (was:Not > enoughlinesavailable for Asterisk implemetation) > > I would be most interested in seeing some TNT/APX configurations and > corrosponding SIP configurations for Asterisk. www.voip-info.org - search for asterisk tnt > > Right now, I'm using call routes and switching off a T1/PRI to my > asterisk box, and would love t...

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2101 Bug ID: 2101 Summary: Unaligned memory access on sparc in UMAC implemetation Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.0p1 Hardware: Sparc OS: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot...

Hi all. I found some issue in implementation of finalizeObject function in MCJIT.cpp. If you look at the source code of the function, you can notice that machine code for second "owned" module will never be generated if it doesn't depend on the first one. More over it will cause a crash if entry point isn't in first module. Implementation of finalizeObject using for loop will

Hi all I am looking at implementing asterisk at a company with two ISDN bricks (60 lines). I know that the VoIP will absorb at least on brick worth of lines but that still leaves me with a need for 30 ISDN lines. As far as I can tell most of the Digicom cards have 4 FXS ports and I've read on this list that at most two could coincide in a box simultaneously without causing an interupt

If you are looking for real high density VOIP termination I would look at > something like a Lucent APX 8000, configure correctly it can pass 2500+ > g.729 calls to the PSTN course we paid lots of $ for ours. > > Chris > Chris, My experience has been that the APX and TNT products require a single SIP proxy, how are you load balancing 2500 calls? If all of the traffic is

Hi Radek, Sorry for the delayed response. I haven't had time to check your analysis yet, but you're probably right: MCJIT's support for multiple modules in a single instance is patchy at best. Do you have a test case (e.g. an lli invocation) that triggers this bug, or is this something you discovered just by reading the code? Cheers, Lang. On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:46 AM, David

...sks the user's permission. > >> He said the "sandbox" is the entire storage on your computer. > > Misunderstandings do happen in natural language. NOP!! He stated NO misunderstanding. I think you are simply repeating you have learned NOT by actually knowing the code and implemetation the way the developer of the product knew it. Your info is both dated and part of the marketing blurbs. Question: 2 marketing execs are talking with each other. Which one of them is lying? ANS: The one whose lips are moving.

..., but I see that it makes sense for a variety of use cases. One question I have here is how this is intended to work where the RM needs to make some of these allocations itself (for graphics context mapping, etc), how should potential conflicts with user mappings be handled? -------- As an initial implemetation you can probably assume that the GPU offloading is in "exclusive" mode. Basically that the CUDA or OpenACC code has full ownership of the card. The Tesla cards don't even have a video out on them. To complicate this even more - some offloading code has very long running kernels a...

...of use cases. One question I have >> here is how this is intended to work where the RM needs to make some >> of these allocations itself (for graphics context mapping, etc), how >> should potential conflicts with user mappings be handled? >> -------- >> As an initial implemetation you can probably assume that the GPU >> offloading is in "exclusive" mode. Basically that the CUDA or OpenACC >> code has full ownership of the card. The Tesla cards don't even have a >> video out on them. To complicate this even more - some offloading code >...

...>>> here is how this is intended to work where the RM needs to make some >>>> of these allocations itself (for graphics context mapping, etc), how >>>> should potential conflicts with user mappings be handled? >>>> -------- >>>> As an initial implemetation you can probably assume that the GPU >>>> offloading is in "exclusive" mode. Basically that the CUDA or OpenACC >>>> code has full ownership of the card. The Tesla cards don't even have a >>>> video out on them. To complicate this even more - s...

...gs of the particular application. In any case, I think it > > might make sense for Vorbis developers to make this change. > > I'm not sure exactly what to make of this, but it sounds perhaps like a > stack overflow issue? On some platforms (I think windows is one) the alloc() implemetation is buggy. Those kinds of bugs can cause all sorts of problems. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/

Hello to everybody ! I don't have a question directly connected with R, but it takes starting point from the use of the R function Krig for kriging interpolation and from the idea of making a different implemetation of the function for my purposes. Doas anyone know where can I find free C or C++ codes of kriging ? As always, thanks a lot in advance, Paola. -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-F...

I would like to know if is it possible implemet a partitioning tree using a function like rpart, or mvpart, and with formula a glm-object (as a logistic models) or a robust linear regression (as least sum of absolute errors). In this case, the appropriate "method" to use is "mrt"? Or another one? Thanks, Anna Maria Paga...

...llow root to login using pubkey authentication. 2. implement a more flexible arrangement where a list of allowed authentication methods could passed to PermitRootLogin. I looked through the code and it seems that both are straightforward to code, but obviously 1 is much less work. I coded up an implemetation of pubkey-only that works for me, and it's attached. I'm willing to work on option 2, but since that's quite a bit more work, I'd like some assurance that that is the _right_ way before I start on it. I think some solution needs to be merged ASAP. I've seen the recom...

...authentication. I would like to implement a samba file server that authenticates of our existing ldap server. Would the best solution be to have samba authticate off of ldap through pam. Is this even available. Can anyone point me in the right direction. Everything out there talks about implemeting samba with a NEW openldap server. I would also consider making samba a PDC but thats not my main goal. What is the best way to go with what I want to do and with what I already have? Any good docs that could help me. All the normal docs dont fit to environment. Thanks in advance

...? Probably not needed. > > If i want to use arm-toolchain-4.2.1 , what should i do for clearing > the instruction cache call in lib/System/Memory.cpp? You have to implement it using inline assembler for GCC 4.2.1 and below to work. You can check the gcc sources to see how __clear_cache got implemeted in gcc 4.3.3 or check the arm reference manual (ARM ARM): http://www.arm.com/miscPDFs/14128.pdf Cheers Xerxes

...9; and 'i' are basically constant so the function has to take these from some kind of global space. So if I take t brute force apporach I came up with: f <- function(MR) { k <- i:N return sum(choose(N,k) * MR ^ k * (1 - MR) ^ (N - k)) - 0.5 } Does this seem like a reasonable implemetation? How are 'N' and 'i' declare as "global"? For each equation N and I are constant but I want to be able to modify them. In other words solve the equantion after setting N to 6 and i to 5 then again after setting i to 4. The next question is regarding which 'R'...

...ended to work where the RM needs to make some > >>>>> of these allocations itself (for graphics context mapping, etc), how > >>>>> should potential conflicts with user mappings be handled? > >>>>> -------- > >>>>> As an initial implemetation you can probably assume that the GPU > >>>>> offloading is in "exclusive" mode. Basically that the CUDA or OpenACC > >>>>> code has full ownership of the card. The Tesla cards don't even have a > >>>>> video out on them. To co...

On 2014/10/26 19:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 04:24:52PM +0800, john.liuli wrote: >> From: Li Liu <john.liuli at huawei.com> >> >> This set of patches try to implemet irqfd support of vhost-net >> based on virtio-mmio. >> >> I had posted a mail to talking about the status of vhost-net >> on kvm-arm refer to http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm-arm/msg10804.html. >> Some dependent patches are listed in the mail too. Basically the >...

On 2014/10/26 19:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 04:24:52PM +0800, john.liuli wrote: >> From: Li Liu <john.liuli at huawei.com> >> >> This set of patches try to implemet irqfd support of vhost-net >> based on virtio-mmio. >> >> I had posted a mail to talking about the status of vhost-net >> on kvm-arm refer to http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm-arm/msg10804.html. >> Some dependent patches are listed in the mail too. Basically the >...