search for: immedaite

before I started building my latest rails app, I made the decision to make good use of ajax. My reasonsing was that users would benefit from the quicker page updates - the application provides various different types of insurance quotes, and has several multi-page forms and reports that can be drilled down 5 or 6 levels deep in some cases - so it seemed like a good candidate for ajax Now

...mp them together. The three things I see in flight are: > > 1) typical globals that are laid out in some unknown way in the address space. > 2) globals that may be tied to a specific knowable address range due to a limited compilation model (e.g. a deeply embedded core) that fits into an immedaite range (e.g. 0…255, 0…65536, etc). > 3) Immediates that are treated as symbolic for CFI’s perspective (so they can’t just be used as a literal immediate) that are resolved at link time, but are known to have limited range. > > There is also "4) immediates with an obvious known value”,...

...spawning external > processes it should take care to restore signal setup to a "normal" state. > This means not only setting SIG_DFL for all signals, but also just as > importantly, the signal mask. It should be set to all ones before calling > fork, and set back to all zeroes immedaitely before execve, as illustrated > in libvirt to avoid races: > > https://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blob;f=src/util/vircommand.c;h=de937f6f9aa91abb518eac98bfac9dcf37e1f5df;hb=HEAD#l304 > > https://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blob;f=src/util/vircommand.c;h=de937f6f9aa91ab...

Peter Dimitrov and myself were debugging a very peculiar bug when libguestfs is run as a plugin from collectd: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-November/thread.html#00023 The long story short is that collectd leaks SIGCHLD == SIG_IGN setting into plugins: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-November/msg00095.html This means that any plugin that does the usual

...The > three things I see in flight are: > > 1) typical globals that are laid out in some unknown way in the address > space. > 2) globals that may be tied to a specific knowable address range due to a > limited compilation model (e.g. a deeply embedded core) that fits into an > immedaite range (e.g. 0…255, 0…65536, etc). > 3) Immediates that are treated as symbolic for CFI’s perspective (so they > can’t just be used as a literal immediate) that are resolved at link time, > but are known to have limited range. > > There is also "4) immediates with an obvious know...

...n app or library is spawning external processes it should take care to restore signal setup to a "normal" state. This means not only setting SIG_DFL for all signals, but also just as importantly, the signal mask. It should be set to all ones before calling fork, and set back to all zeroes immedaitely before execve, as illustrated in libvirt to avoid races: https://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blob;f=src/util/vircommand.c;h=de937f6f9aa91abb518eac98bfac9dcf37e1f5df;hb=HEAD#l304 https://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blob;f=src/util/vircommand.c;h=de937f6f9aa91abb518eac98bfac9dcf37e1f5df...

Hi list, I just came across this site: http://web.mit.edu/xiphmont/Public/theora/demo.html I was wondering are these issues being addressed or will be addressed before the 1.0 release? Theora is like the only open sourced free code people can use, i will be nice if it performs close to other libs. please keep up the good work! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

...see in flight are: >> >> 1) typical globals that are laid out in some unknown way in the address >> space. >> 2) globals that may be tied to a specific knowable address range due to a >> limited compilation model (e.g. a deeply embedded core) that fits into an >> immedaite range (e.g. 0…255, 0…65536, etc). >> 3) Immediates that are treated as symbolic for CFI’s perspective (so they >> can’t just be used as a literal immediate) that are resolved at link time, >> but are known to have limited range. >> >> There is also "4) immediates...

...bout how to clump them together. The three things I see in flight are: 1) typical globals that are laid out in some unknown way in the address space. 2) globals that may be tied to a specific knowable address range due to a limited compilation model (e.g. a deeply embedded core) that fits into an immedaite range (e.g. 0…255, 0…65536, etc). 3) Immediates that are treated as symbolic for CFI’s perspective (so they can’t just be used as a literal immediate) that are resolved at link time, but are known to have limited range. There is also "4) immediates with an obvious known value”, but those are...

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Rafael Espíndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > You get the code you want with > > > > @foo = external hidden global i8 > > > > or > > > > @foo = external protected global i8 > > Sorry, not quiet. What you get is > > leaq foo(%rip), %rax > > Since it is still assuming foo is a

> You get the code you want with > > @foo = external hidden global i8 > > or > > @foo = external protected global i8 Sorry, not quiet. What you get is leaq foo(%rip), %rax Since it is still assuming foo is a position in the file. So yes, we need a way to declare an absolute value. If we can declare it, we may as well use the same construct to define it. I guess the