Displaying 20 results from an estimated 87 matches for "immateri".
Did you mean:
immaterial
2009 Sep 07
7
How can I have the tests for my Rails app to be executed in a random order?
Hi
How can I have the tests for my Rails app to be executed in a random
order? Is there a simple solution using rake?
I already posted my question to stackoverflow (http://
stackoverflow.com/questions/1376267/ruby-executing-tests-in-a-random-
order-with-rake) but the few responses I got were not able to solve
the problem.
Thanks a lot!
Pietro Di Bello
2009 Jun 23
3
subset POSIXct
...dt column is
datetime and the tf column is a temperature.
dt tf
1 2009-06-20 00:53:00 73
2 2009-06-20 01:08:00 73
3 2009-06-20 01:44:00 72
4 2009-06-20 01:53:00 71
5 2009-06-20 02:07:00 72
...
I need a subset of the rows where the minutes are 53. The hour is
immaterial. I can not find a wildcard character to use to select the
rows.
as.character(wtd$dt) %in% "2009-06-21 ??:53:00" or as.character(wtd
$dt) %in% "2009-06-21 **:53:00" does not work.
What would you recommend?
Thanks,
Keith Jones, Ph.D.
VTS Pumps
2008 May 14
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM as a DLL
On May 13, 2008, at 6:38 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
> Last time I checked, building LLVM on Windows (MinGW or MSVC) did not
> produce dlls.
>
> Has this changed?
>
> I was succesful converting the libraries produced by MinGW to dlls,
> though.
>
It's a little bit immaterial whether they're shared or static
libraries, since one would be distributing them bundled with your
compiler anyways. But yes, they are static because certain dynamic
linkers choke on them when done dynamically.
--Owen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was s...
2008 May 13
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM as a DLL
Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> writes:
> On May 13, 2008, at 1:30 AM, kr512 wrote:
>>
>> Nevertheless, LLVM is not provided as a ready-to-use DLL,
>> unfortunately.
>
> This is exactly why I asked if you had downloaded and compiled it. If
> you had, you might have noticed that it does produce a set of ready-to-
> use shared libraries. I'm sorry
2011 Jan 13
3
Question about histogram
...rstanding of why the results I get from a call to hist() are not as
I thought I would get. When I use the parameter freq=FALSE, I think the
plot will contain bars that none of them is larger than 1, because
they're probabilities. But for my code, the bars exceeded 1.
The actual data seems immaterial. I tried with dummy data:
> hist(runif(1000), freq=FALSE)
and the histogram includes bars well over 1 in height. The man page
says that freq=FALSE produces densities, so that the total area is 1.
Clearly if all the values are between 0 and 1, as is the case here, some
of the bars stan...
2008 Aug 14
2
Department of Redundancy Department.
...a recent posting, and couldn't
restrain my self from commenting. The usage was of the form
``if(X==TRUE)''
where X was a logical variable.
This sort of thing is brought to you by your Department of Redundancy
Department. The ``==TRUE'' bit is irrelevant, incompetent, and
immaterial,
as Perry Mason used to say. The value of X==TRUE is exactly the same as
the value of X when X is a logical variable. If X is not a logical
variable
a lot of strange things can happen, depending on the nature of X.
It is safer and takes 6 fewer key strokes to use ``if(X)''. So why n...
2007 Oct 29
2
Setting variables in modules - order important?
Puppeteers,
For some reason I have to assign my variable before I include my class
for the assignment to ''take''. I though the ordering was immaterial. Am
I doing something wrong (again) or is this a funny?
-----------------------
This works:
<0> sa_dewha@engpsr0000.intranetdev.barcapdev.com (0 jobs)
/users/unix/sa_dewha/SVNCheckOut/bootstrap/puppet/modules/ztest/examples
% cat setup.pp
$int_var = "Set in setup.pp example"...
2016 Jun 03
2
Switching to git (Windows experience) (was re:[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?)
...erse is also true, if we can't do it on console, GUIs won't
> do it either, and we can't move to Git only.
>
> That's all there is to it.
The end result is "go use the console". Whether that's because people
recommend it or because it's the only option is immaterial. The fact
remains, we don't have to do that today, we may have to do that
tomorrow, and some people view that as a regression. Let's not be
dismissive of that by claiming it's a personal preference, please.
>
>
>> I guess people here can be divided on those who using/used...
2006 Jul 04
2
unique deletes names - intended?
Dear All,
as shown in the example, unique() deletes names of vector elements.
Is this intended?
Of course, one can use indexing by !duplicated() instead.
Greetings,
Heinz
## unique deletes names
v1 <- c(a=1, b=2, c=3, e=2, a=4)
unique(v1) # names deleted
v1[!duplicated(v1)] # names preserved
platform i386-pc-mingw32
arch i386
2013 Oct 30
3
[LLVMdev] [Propose] Add address-taken bit to GlobalVariable for disambiguation purpose
...hen it runs?
>
>
I'm not quire sure your question. Let me try to answer.
In my implementation, I set address_no_taken in
lib/Transformation/IPO/GlobalOpt.cpp.
In this pass, it tries to see if a global var has its address taken
before it tries to optimize
the global variable.
ModRef is immaterial in this regard.
What I'm try to say in "A4" is that it is really *troublesome* if we
save the
addr-taken-analysis result to a analysis-pass (rather than cache the
result to
GlobalVariable::addr_not_taken). If we really have to implement this way,
we need to at very least implem...
2003 Mar 16
3
win3.1 in wine & suse8.1
...e[s]?
What advantage[s] do I gain by keeping those actual partitions active?
Should I copy any other \WINDOWS\ files to wine /fake.../ directory?
Even though `setupwine saw the two fat16 partitions it assigned win95
file formats rather than fat16.
I left the win95 - was I correct? [could be immaterial if D:\ & E:\ do
not stay]
Am I correct in assuming that I do not have to delete/resetup wine after
an update with rpm?
Thanks,
Serge
2011 Jul 28
0
[LLVMdev] git
...re for us to switch.
Ah. Here is where I think we have some miscommunication happening.
Here's how I am thinking about things. Reviews should keep happening
the way they are. In fact, what we are doing now is exactly the same
work one would have to do to review a git branch, but that's immaterial.
There are great tools in git for sending a patch stream to the mailing
list. To me, there isn't a compelling reason to change the current
review system.
I think the disagreement (if we can call it that) is really over what
actually gets pushed to "mainline" which I assume would b...
2013 Oct 30
0
[LLVMdev] [Propose] Add address-taken bit to GlobalVariable for disambiguation purpose
...re sure your question. Let me try to answer.
>
> In my implementation, I set address_no_taken in
> lib/Transformation/IPO/GlobalOpt.cpp.
> In this pass, it tries to see if a global var has its address taken
> before it tries to optimize
> the global variable.
>
> ModRef is immaterial in this regard.
>
> What I'm try to say in "A4" is that it is really *troublesome* if we
> save the
> addr-taken-analysis result to a analysis-pass (rather than cache the
> result to
> GlobalVariable::addr_not_taken). If we really have to implement this
> way...
2011 Mar 04
4
!map:HashWithIndifferentAccess
Hi All,
I have an extremely frustrating problem and I kind of think this is an
error in rails, but you never know.
I have a hash of objects that I am iterating through in order to display
the needed info. As I am doing that and displaying half a dozen values,
one value is being interrupted by rails as a hash and giving me this
error:
--- !map:HashWithIndifferentAccess comm: "1"
2001 Apr 07
2
silent extern error (PR#898)
Full_Name: Byron Ellis
Version: 1.2.2
OS: all
Submission from: (NULL) (140.247.105.95)
R_ext/Arith.h
#ifdef MAIN
#define extern
#endif
#ifdef __cplusplus
extern "C" {
#endif
these two should be reversed. Its never a problem because builds aren't done
against C++ compilers, but its still an error (just a low priority one).
also, you could change that to
#ifdef __cplusplus
extern
2011 Jul 23
1
[LLVMdev] git
On Jul 23, 2011, at 4:34 AM, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes:
>
>> I really do appreciate distributed VCS, but only as staging.
>> Incremental development is crucial for the project and "take this git
>> push with 100K of code" will never be acceptable.
>
> Incremental development is probably promoted by DVCS far
1999 Oct 06
1
R-0.65.1 is released
...e too curious to wait, I'll put a copy in
ftp://blueberry.kubism.ku.dk/pub/R-devel/R-0.65.1.tgz
There's also a version split in two for floppies and a patch file if
you prefer that. (If you use the patch file, you will miss a logo.bmp
file in the gnuwin32 directory, but that is probably immaterial to
most of you).
For the R Core Team,
Peter D.
Here is the relevant part of the NEWS file:
CHANGES IN R VERSION 0.65.1
NEW FEATURES
o .C, .Fortran. .Call and .External now have an argument PACKAGE
to specify the shared library to be used for the symbol. See
?Foreign. Package w...
1999 Oct 06
1
R-0.65.1 is released
...e too curious to wait, I'll put a copy in
ftp://blueberry.kubism.ku.dk/pub/R-devel/R-0.65.1.tgz
There's also a version split in two for floppies and a patch file if
you prefer that. (If you use the patch file, you will miss a logo.bmp
file in the gnuwin32 directory, but that is probably immaterial to
most of you).
For the R Core Team,
Peter D.
Here is the relevant part of the NEWS file:
CHANGES IN R VERSION 0.65.1
NEW FEATURES
o .C, .Fortran. .Call and .External now have an argument PACKAGE
to specify the shared library to be used for the symbol. See
?Foreign. Package w...
2004 Jun 23
5
assigning from multiple return values
I know that if I have a function that returns multiple values, I should
do return(list(foo, bar)). But what do I do on the recieving end?
fn <- function(x) {
return(list(foo, bar))
}
I know that at this point I could say
values.list <- fn(x)
and then access
values.list[1]
values.list[2]
But that's hideous. I'd rather be able to say something like
list(local_foo, local_bar)
2017 Jul 06
2
Uncovering non-determinism in LLVM - The Next Steps
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of
> > Grang, Mandeep Singh via llvm-dev
> > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:56 AM
> > To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> > Subject: [llvm-dev]