search for: immaterial

Hi How can I have the tests for my Rails app to be executed in a random order? Is there a simple solution using rake? I already posted my question to stackoverflow (http:// stackoverflow.com/questions/1376267/ruby-executing-tests-in-a-random- order-with-rake) but the few responses I got were not able to solve the problem. Thanks a lot! Pietro Di Bello

...dt column is datetime and the tf column is a temperature. dt tf 1 2009-06-20 00:53:00 73 2 2009-06-20 01:08:00 73 3 2009-06-20 01:44:00 72 4 2009-06-20 01:53:00 71 5 2009-06-20 02:07:00 72 ... I need a subset of the rows where the minutes are 53. The hour is immaterial. I can not find a wildcard character to use to select the rows. as.character(wtd$dt) %in% "2009-06-21 ??:53:00" or as.character(wtd $dt) %in% "2009-06-21 **:53:00" does not work. What would you recommend? Thanks, Keith Jones, Ph.D. VTS Pumps

On May 13, 2008, at 6:38 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Last time I checked, building LLVM on Windows (MinGW or MSVC) did not > produce dlls. > > Has this changed? > > I was succesful converting the libraries produced by MinGW to dlls, > though. > It's a little bit immaterial whether they're shared or static libraries, since one would be distributing them bundled with your compiler anyways. But yes, they are static because certain dynamic linkers choke on them when done dynamically. --Owen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scr...

Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> writes: > On May 13, 2008, at 1:30 AM, kr512 wrote: >> >> Nevertheless, LLVM is not provided as a ready-to-use DLL, >> unfortunately. > > This is exactly why I asked if you had downloaded and compiled it. If > you had, you might have noticed that it does produce a set of ready-to- > use shared libraries. I'm sorry

...rstanding of why the results I get from a call to hist() are not as I thought I would get. When I use the parameter freq=FALSE, I think the plot will contain bars that none of them is larger than 1, because they're probabilities. But for my code, the bars exceeded 1. The actual data seems immaterial. I tried with dummy data: > hist(runif(1000), freq=FALSE) and the histogram includes bars well over 1 in height. The man page says that freq=FALSE produces densities, so that the total area is 1. Clearly if all the values are between 0 and 1, as is the case here, some of the bars stand...

...a recent posting, and couldn't restrain my self from commenting. The usage was of the form ``if(X==TRUE)'' where X was a logical variable. This sort of thing is brought to you by your Department of Redundancy Department. The ``==TRUE'' bit is irrelevant, incompetent, and immaterial, as Perry Mason used to say. The value of X==TRUE is exactly the same as the value of X when X is a logical variable. If X is not a logical variable a lot of strange things can happen, depending on the nature of X. It is safer and takes 6 fewer key strokes to use ``if(X)''. So why not...

Puppeteers, For some reason I have to assign my variable before I include my class for the assignment to ''take''. I though the ordering was immaterial. Am I doing something wrong (again) or is this a funny? ----------------------- This works: <0> sa_dewha@engpsr0000.intranetdev.barcapdev.com (0 jobs) /users/unix/sa_dewha/SVNCheckOut/bootstrap/puppet/modules/ztest/examples % cat setup.pp $int_var = "Set in setup.pp example" i...

...erse is also true, if we can't do it on console, GUIs won't > do it either, and we can't move to Git only. > > That's all there is to it. The end result is "go use the console". Whether that's because people recommend it or because it's the only option is immaterial. The fact remains, we don't have to do that today, we may have to do that tomorrow, and some people view that as a regression. Let's not be dismissive of that by claiming it's a personal preference, please. > > >> I guess people here can be divided on those who using/used b...

Dear All, as shown in the example, unique() deletes names of vector elements. Is this intended? Of course, one can use indexing by !duplicated() instead. Greetings, Heinz ## unique deletes names v1 <- c(a=1, b=2, c=3, e=2, a=4) unique(v1) # names deleted v1[!duplicated(v1)] # names preserved platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch i386

...hen it runs? > > I'm not quire sure your question. Let me try to answer. In my implementation, I set address_no_taken in lib/Transformation/IPO/GlobalOpt.cpp. In this pass, it tries to see if a global var has its address taken before it tries to optimize the global variable. ModRef is immaterial in this regard. What I'm try to say in "A4" is that it is really *troublesome* if we save the addr-taken-analysis result to a analysis-pass (rather than cache the result to GlobalVariable::addr_not_taken). If we really have to implement this way, we need to at very least implemen...

...e[s]? What advantage[s] do I gain by keeping those actual partitions active? Should I copy any other \WINDOWS\ files to wine /fake.../ directory? Even though `setupwine saw the two fat16 partitions it assigned win95 file formats rather than fat16. I left the win95 - was I correct? [could be immaterial if D:\ & E:\ do not stay] Am I correct in assuming that I do not have to delete/resetup wine after an update with rpm? Thanks, Serge

...re for us to switch. Ah. Here is where I think we have some miscommunication happening. Here's how I am thinking about things. Reviews should keep happening the way they are. In fact, what we are doing now is exactly the same work one would have to do to review a git branch, but that's immaterial. There are great tools in git for sending a patch stream to the mailing list. To me, there isn't a compelling reason to change the current review system. I think the disagreement (if we can call it that) is really over what actually gets pushed to "mainline" which I assume would be...

...re sure your question. Let me try to answer. > > In my implementation, I set address_no_taken in > lib/Transformation/IPO/GlobalOpt.cpp. > In this pass, it tries to see if a global var has its address taken > before it tries to optimize > the global variable. > > ModRef is immaterial in this regard. > > What I'm try to say in "A4" is that it is really *troublesome* if we > save the > addr-taken-analysis result to a analysis-pass (rather than cache the > result to > GlobalVariable::addr_not_taken). If we really have to implement this > way,...

Hi All, I have an extremely frustrating problem and I kind of think this is an error in rails, but you never know. I have a hash of objects that I am iterating through in order to display the needed info. As I am doing that and displaying half a dozen values, one value is being interrupted by rails as a hash and giving me this error: --- !map:HashWithIndifferentAccess comm: "1"

Full_Name: Byron Ellis Version: 1.2.2 OS: all Submission from: (NULL) (140.247.105.95) R_ext/Arith.h #ifdef MAIN #define extern #endif #ifdef __cplusplus extern "C" { #endif these two should be reversed. Its never a problem because builds aren't done against C++ compilers, but its still an error (just a low priority one). also, you could change that to #ifdef __cplusplus extern

On Jul 23, 2011, at 4:34 AM, Matthieu Moy wrote: > Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: > >> I really do appreciate distributed VCS, but only as staging. >> Incremental development is crucial for the project and "take this git >> push with 100K of code" will never be acceptable. > > Incremental development is probably promoted by DVCS far

...e too curious to wait, I'll put a copy in ftp://blueberry.kubism.ku.dk/pub/R-devel/R-0.65.1.tgz There's also a version split in two for floppies and a patch file if you prefer that. (If you use the patch file, you will miss a logo.bmp file in the gnuwin32 directory, but that is probably immaterial to most of you). For the R Core Team, Peter D. Here is the relevant part of the NEWS file: CHANGES IN R VERSION 0.65.1 NEW FEATURES o .C, .Fortran. .Call and .External now have an argument PACKAGE to specify the shared library to be used for the symbol. See ?Foreign. Package wri...

...e too curious to wait, I'll put a copy in ftp://blueberry.kubism.ku.dk/pub/R-devel/R-0.65.1.tgz There's also a version split in two for floppies and a patch file if you prefer that. (If you use the patch file, you will miss a logo.bmp file in the gnuwin32 directory, but that is probably immaterial to most of you). For the R Core Team, Peter D. Here is the relevant part of the NEWS file: CHANGES IN R VERSION 0.65.1 NEW FEATURES o .C, .Fortran. .Call and .External now have an argument PACKAGE to specify the shared library to be used for the symbol. See ?Foreign. Package wri...

I know that if I have a function that returns multiple values, I should do return(list(foo, bar)). But what do I do on the recieving end? fn <- function(x) { return(list(foo, bar)) } I know that at this point I could say values.list <- fn(x) and then access values.list[1] values.list[2] But that's hideous. I'd rather be able to say something like list(local_foo, local_bar)

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of > > Grang, Mandeep Singh via llvm-dev > > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 2:56 AM > > To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > > Subject: [llvm-dev]