search for: iirc

On 4/28/2016 2:11 PM, Rail Shafigulin wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek > <kparzysz at codeaurora.org <mailto:kparzysz at codeaurora.org>> wrote: > > > IIRC, > > What is IIRC? If I remember correctly... -Krzysztof -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

I am using a Solaris + ZFS environment to export a iSCSI block layer device and use the snapshot facility to take a snapshot of the ZFS volume. Is there an existing Volume Shadow Copy (VSS) implementation on Windows for this environment? Thanks S Joshi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi All, What are my e-mail serving options? I need to host POP, IMAP and SMTP. I must admit that non-windows e-mail hosting has always been a chore for me. I remember QMail and QPopper IIRC. -Jason

Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> writes: > There was a bug at some point where this would happen, I've forgotten > the details but it is buried in bugzilla somewhere. It has now been > fixed, but IIRC the issue would also be resolved if you did a full > make clean. The problem was in a particular situation where every > build would essentially invalidate the table gen outputs, but not > actually update them, so the build never resolved itself. IIRC, that bug was resolved before the 2.6...

...could show that write I/O size seems >>> could be pass from the application layers, >> >> well, sure, the application layer drives IO with the IO size it >> chooses. But when the application layer issues IOs larger then the >> maximum IO size allowed by SMB (8 MB iirc), the Windows SMB kernel >> client will segment the larger application segments into smaller ones. > > Fastcopy is doing *something* weird :-). > > 1. FastCopy (FastCopy.exe), 8MB (need to revise FastCopy default setup) > Process Name??? Operation?????? Path??? Detail > S...

...to i32*) ; <i32> [#uses=1] >>> ret i32 %0 >>> } >>> >>> generates incorrect code on LLVM 2.4: >>> >>> 0x7ffff6d54010: mov 0xc1d9c4(%rip),%eax # 0x7ffff79719da >>> 0x7ffff6d54016: retq >> >> IIRC, one workaround is to use a GlobalValue instead of a IntToPtr on a >> Constant. > > Err, how? I can't figure out how to do it. The only documentation for > GlobalValue describes it as a superclass of GlobalVariables and Functions. IIRC, the stuff I used was something like......

Hi Arabinda, > 1. Can LLVM be used in a dynamic binary translator? Dynamic translator > translators target code for an architecture (say PPC) to host code (say x86) > and execute it. There has been some discussion about this within the past two months on this list, IIRC. You should try searching the archives for that discussion. IIRC, the outcome is that transforming binary code into LLVM IR is very, very tricky, and almost impossible to do right for any possible input binary. Others can problem comment a bit more on the topic, I'm just repeating what I hear...

...write I/O size seems >>>>could be pass from the application layers, >>> >>>well, sure, the application layer drives IO with the IO size it >>>chooses. But when the application layer issues IOs larger then the >>>maximum IO size allowed by SMB (8 MB iirc), the Windows SMB kernel >>>client will segment the larger application segments into smaller >>>ones. >> >>Fastcopy is doing *something* weird :-). >> >>1. FastCopy (FastCopy.exe), 8MB (need to revise FastCopy default setup) >>Process Name??? Operat...

...rect for Mach-O and COFF? >> >> bigcheese noted on IRC that the test crashes the COFF emitter. For some >> reason I am always getting >> >>        movl    $256, %eax              ## imm = 0x100 >>        calll   *%eax >> >> on darwin already > > IIRC, we never use Static on Darwin targets. > > -Eli >

Hi iam keep getting this log in my asterisk log is this harm anything, and how can stop this, any suggestions Jun 4 18:21:47 DEBUG[2093] chan_sip.c: Stopping retransmission on '45629314783bd11604363618632f07b9@201.x.x.x' of Request 102: Match Found Jun 4 18:21:48 DEBUG[2173] manager.c: Manager received command 'Command' Jun 4 18:21:48 DEBUG[2173] manager.c: Manager received

Hello List, I am a newbie regarding LLVM and need some information on LLVM. I am working on dynamic binary translation and I am looking into if LLVM can be used for the purpose. The goal here is to generate highly optimized translated (host) code from target code. I have following questions. 1. Can LLVM be used in a dynamic binary translator? Dynamic translator translators target code for an

On 11/01/2017 03:25 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Mark Haney <mark.haney at neonova.net> said: >> Okay, so it looks like I can simply change ksdevice=eth0? to >> bootdev=eth0, correct? > I believe you can just leave both off (IIRC for CentOS 6 as well) if you > add "ipappend 2" to the pxelinux stanza. > I probably should have clarified that we're not using PXE and probably won't for the forseeable future.? This is just a simple netinstall disc/flash drive boot. -- Mark Haney Network Engineer at Ne...

Hi, On 26-11-15 13:52, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: <snip> >> I do not have a GK106, I've a GK208, and IIRC that one is known to not >> work, >> I guess I can give it a try. > > Compute support is not supported on GK110+, yeah... > > If you provide me a MMT trace of, for example, vectorAdd from the CUDA samples I could have a look. Ok, here is a MMT trace of vectorAdd: https://f...

...gt;> Because of the -Werror, this warning is taken as an error >> and compilation aborts. I wonder why it warns in the first >> place, is something broken with xgcc? > > I suspect this is due to the recent change by Bill (revision 46747). Bill's change only affected darwin IIRC. I don't know that anyone has built GOMP on linux yet, and OpenMP hasn't been widely tested at all. I'd suggest using --enable-languages=c,c++ -Chris

...ut >>> an AD but with a simple KDC? >> >> No idea, I have no use for such a set up, so have never tried. I >> think, unless someone has already done what you require, you may be on >> your own. > > this has been a quite common setup in certain environment. Iirc it > should still work. Iirc when we applied security hardening recently we > change to reject service tickets with a PAC when we're running in > security=user mode, but the details escape my mind. > > -slow > > It may be a common setup, but it isn't one I have c...

...st (which gets to break the rules of floating-point math) against the code generated by another compiler that hasn't been allowed to break those rules. It's very possible that -Ofast doesn't even make sense for your library, unless you don't care about the accuracy of your results. IIRC, Clang doesn't actually do anything with -ffast-math, either. So, an apples-to-apples comparison would not use -Ofast or -ffast-math for either. Of course, it's completely fair criticism to say that, for people who don't require exact FP math, -Ofast gives a very nice performance boost...

My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're supporting. Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, but I see their Windows binaries are now not-free, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks highly of backuppc; comments on that, or other packaged solutions? mark

On 23 August 2016 at 00:42, Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> wrote: > v2: > - guard LED framework calls with ifdef CONFIG_LEDS_CLASS > IIRC kernel has the tendency of using static inlines in the headers when CONFIG_foo is not set. Worth using that and removing the ifdef from the source file ? -Emil

> this comes directly from your system headers (/usr/include/bits/select.h) > and as such doesn't really have anything to do with llvm-gcc: iirc there were some fixincludes hacks for FD_ZERO thing. Maybe are presented presented in one version and does not - in another, thus the difference... -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

IIRC the kernel uses relocation model as static. -eric On Oct 21, 2011, at 3:57 PM, David Meyer wrote: > Eli, > > Hm. There's a test in (CodeGen/X86/call-imm.ll) which uses darwin with > relocation model static. It expects to use call-to-immediate. > > Is this in error? Shoul...