Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "ihi0044".
Did you mean:
ihi0044e
2013 Nov 04
3
[LLVMdev] [ARM] Mixing rel/rela relocations
...opher wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Shankar Easwaran
> <shankare at codeaurora.org <mailto:shankare at codeaurora.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at the ARM ABI
> docs(http://infocenter.arm.__com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.__ihi0044e/IHI0044E_aaelf.pdf
> <http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0044e/IHI0044E_aaelf.pdf>)
> and they mention.
>
> "A binary file may use REL or RELA relocations or a mixture of the
> two (but multiple relocations for the same
> address mu...
2013 Nov 04
4
[LLVMdev] [ARM] Mixing rel/rela relocations
Hi,
I was looking at the ARM ABI
docs(http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0044e/IHI0044E_aaelf.pdf)
and they mention.
"A binary file may use REL or RELA relocations or a mixture of the two
(but multiple relocations for the same
address must use only one type)."
Does LLVM emit rel/rela relocations with ARM ?
Any tests ?
Thanks
Shankar Easwaran
--
Qualcomm In...
2015 Aug 04
2
[LLVMdev] Help needed about code & data mixing when emit object files
Hi,
I'm building a new backend which can only load very limited range of imm.
So I decided to use constant pool, and place constant pool entries close
enough to instructions use the entries (we have very limited range
PC-relative memory load). However, lld & llc output the object files that
gather all constant pool entries into one section. How can I make them mix
these entries into code
2013 Nov 04
0
[LLVMdev] [ARM] Mixing rel/rela relocations
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Shankar Easwaran
<shankare at codeaurora.org>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at the ARM ABI docs(http://infocenter.arm.
> com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0044e/IHI0044E_aaelf.pdf) and they mention.
>
> "A binary file may use REL or RELA relocations or a mixture of the two
> (but multiple relocations for the same
> address must use only one type)."
>
> Does LLVM emit rel/rela relocations with ARM ?
>
>
I hope not. Ew.
-e...
2013 Nov 04
0
[LLVMdev] [ARM] Mixing rel/rela relocations
...gt;
>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Shankar Easwaran
>> <shankare at codeaurora.org <mailto:shankare at codeaurora.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was looking at the ARM ABI
>> docs(http://infocenter.arm.__com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.__ihi0044e/IHI0044E_aaelf.pdf
>> <http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0044e/IHI0044E_aaelf.pdf>)
>> and they mention.
>>
>> "A binary file may use REL or RELA relocations or a mixture of the
>> two (but multiple relocations for the same
>...
2015 Aug 26
2
Proposal: arbitrary relocations in constant global initializers
...tion as constant expressions:
>
> (sub (add (ptrtoint @foo) 0xeafffffe) cur_pos)
>
> no?
I'm not sure if this would be sufficient. The R_ARM_JUMP24 relocation
on ARM has specific semantics to implement ARM/Thumb interworking; see
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0044e/IHI0044E_aaelf.pdf
Note that R_ARM_CALL has the same operation but different semantics.
I suppose that we could try looking at the addend to decide which relocation
to use, but this would mean adding more complexity to the assembler (along
with any pattern matching that would need to be done). It...
2015 Aug 26
2
Proposal: arbitrary relocations in constant global initializers
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:53:33PM -0400, Rafael EspĂndola wrote:
> > I'm not sure if this would be sufficient. The R_ARM_JUMP24 relocation
> > on ARM has specific semantics to implement ARM/Thumb interworking; see
> > http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0044e/IHI0044E_aaelf.pdf
> > Note that R_ARM_CALL has the same operation but different semantics.
> > I suppose that we could try looking at the addend to decide which relocation
> > to use, but this would mean adding more complexity to the assembler (along
> > with any pattern m...
2013 May 13
0
[LLVMdev] Generate PE\COFF file with ARM instructions
Moshe, Nir wrote:
[...]
> I have a question about the LLVM ARM backend:
>
> I try to build *.c files for Windows Phone (Windows 8) - so, basically
> I need to generate an "arm-pe" file (I *think* it has the same file
> structure like x86-pe file, but i am not sure).
> unfortunately, LLVM has no support with ARM PE\COFF.
We recently ran into this. Unfortunately
2016 Oct 07
2
Proposal: arbitrary relocations in constant global initializers
...015 at 03:53:33PM -0400, Rafael EspĂndola wrote:
> >> > I'm not sure if this would be sufficient. The R_ARM_JUMP24 relocation
> >> > on ARM has specific semantics to implement ARM/Thumb interworking; see
> >> > http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0044e/
> IHI0044E_aaelf.pdf
> >> > Note that R_ARM_CALL has the same operation but different semantics.
> >> > I suppose that we could try looking at the addend to decide which
> relocation
> >> > to use, but this would mean adding more complexity to the assembl...
2016 Oct 07
2
Proposal: arbitrary relocations in constant global initializers
...sure if this would be sufficient. The R_ARM_JUMP24
> relocation
> >> >> > on ARM has specific semantics to implement ARM/Thumb interworking;
> >> >> > see
> >> >> >
> >> >> > http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0044e/
> IHI0044E_aaelf.pdf
> >> >> > Note that R_ARM_CALL has the same operation but different
> semantics.
> >> >> > I suppose that we could try looking at the addend to decide which
> >> >> > relocation
> >> >> > to use, bu...
2013 May 13
4
[LLVMdev] Generate PE\COFF file with ARM instructions
Hi guys,
I have a question about the LLVM ARM backend:
I try to build *.c files for Windows Phone (Windows 8) - so, basically I need to generate an "arm-pe" file (I *think* it has the same file structure like x86-pe file, but i am not sure).
unfortunately, LLVM has no support with ARM PE\COFF.
Any ideas?
How difficult is to add the support in this file format? (LLC can generate ARM
2016 Oct 07
2
Proposal: arbitrary relocations in constant global initializers
...t;> >> > on ARM has specific semantics to implement ARM/Thumb
> interworking;
> >> >> >> > see
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.
> ihi0044e/IHI0044E_aaelf.pdf
> >> >> >> > Note that R_ARM_CALL has the same operation but different
> >> >> >> > semantics.
> >> >> >> > I suppose that we could try looking at the addend to decide
> which
> >> >> >&...