search for: ife1

...network (ip : 192.168.212.235) My Load_Balancing.sh script : /*IFI="eth0" IPI="192.168.212.235" NMI="24" IFE2="eth1" IPE2="196.200.8.75" NWE2="196.200.8.0" NME2="29" BRD2="196.200.8.255" GWE2="196.200.8.73" IFE1="eth2" IPE1="192.168.1.200" NWE1="192.168.1.0" NME1="24" BRD1="192.168.1.255" GWE1="192.168.1.2" IFE3="eth3" IPE3="192.168.2.200" NWE3="192.168.2.0" NME3="24" BRD3="192.168.2.255" GWE3=&qu...

Hello all I continue fighting with load balancing, I though it was easier :-/ Here is the script with my configuration #!/bin/sh IFI=eth0 IPI=192.168.10.155 NMI=24 IFE1=eth1 IPE1=192.168.1.128 NWE1=192.168.1.0 NME1=24 BRD1=192.168.1.255 GWE1=192.168.1.1 IFE2=eth2 IPE2=192.168.254.128 NWE2=192.168.254.0 NME2=24 BRD2=192.168.254.255 GWE2=192.168.254.254 ip link set $IFI up ip addr add $IPI/$NMI brd + dev IFI ip rule add prio 50 table main ip route del default tabl...

hi currently i am using redhat enterprise linux 5 for multi gateway routing with 5 internet connection on static ip and all is working fine, now i want to use 5 adsl lines with dynamic ip but there is no doc. in lartc and in nano''s how to for dynamic ip, so can u plz help me out thanks in advance nilesh chouhan __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!?

...rface (eth2 - cheaper link) nad the rest of the traffic go to another interface (eth0 - frame relay very expensive). I am using this script to make the mark and balance: ------- #!/bin/bash IPT="/usr/local/sbin/iptables" IP="/sbin/ip" #---- # Declara redes #---- # FrameRelay IFE1="eth0" IPE1="200.163.208.3" NWE1="200.163.208.0/26" GWE1="200.163.208.1" PRE1="3" # # DSL IFE2="eth2" IPE2="10.1.1.10" NWE2="10.1.1.0/24" GWE2="10.1.1.1" PRE2="1" #--- # Tabelas de roteamento #--- L...

Hi list gurus, long story short we have firewall machine which is the default gateway for our clients and firewall send traffic out to Internet via cisco router. On cisco we have two serial interfaces 1Mb and 2Mb. On firewall #route add default gw xxx.xxx.xx.xxx (for 2mb) #route add default gw xxx.xxx.xx.xxx (for 1mb) and the same rule for Imb link route packets via these two links. However I

...i get different interface for that entries, so it doesn''t forward my requests, i have done masquerading for client nodes, the ip rule/route are as follows, ip rule add prio 222 table 222 ip route add default table 222 proto static \ nexthop via $GWE1 dev $IFE1 weight 1\ nexthop via $GWE2 dev $IFE2 weight 1 Now after traceroute failure, if i see the routing cache for that ip, it shows following, 205.158.62.141 via 203.88.135.213 dev eth1 src 203.88.135.212 cache mtu 1500 advmss 1460 205.158.62.141 from 192.168.1.51 via 203.88.135....

Hello list, I want a set-up with a satellite link (eth0) and a cellular cdma link (ppp0) coming into a linux box with a LAN (eth1 or wlan0) to be able to route first through the satellite when it''s on, or else the cdma when it''s in range. Load sharing is not critical, but it would be nice. The satellite has a static IP, the cdma is dynamic. Both WANs are

Hi all, I have implemented load balancing using the tutorial http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt ..The traffic is going through both my external network interface. I have some questions regarding this: ip route add default table 222 proto static \ nexthop via GWE1 dev IFE1 \ nexthop via GWE2 dev IFE2 The author explains the kernel chooses both the interfaces alternately (weight being 1 for both). Can anyone please elaborate this, like how the kernel will decide this??? Will it decide using any hash functions??? Is this kind of loadbalancing similar to ECMP (Eq...

...to the other one I send the rest I have. The problem I am facing is about prio at tables: ip rule add fwmark 1 table 201 prio 202 This is the rule I make. This is, I thinbk, working fine. The default gateway is set into table 222 just like this: ip route add default table 222 $GWE1 dev $IFE1 My question is: wich one will get hit first? Like, when a package comes and look for a gateway it will start looking in lower prio or higher prio tables? If it looks in lower, then my rule is right. The other way I will have to rewrite it. Att, Nataniel Klug

...tion with different or same interface for those entries, but off the two entries only one route path is used for the transmission. the ip rule/route are as follows, ip rule add prio 222 table 222 ip route add default table 222 proto static \ nexthop via $GWE1 dev $IFE1 weight 1\ nexthop via $GWE2 dev $IFE2 weight 1 if i see the routing cache for that ip, shows following, 205.158.62.141 via 203.88.135.213 dev eth1 src 203.88.135.212 cache mtu 1500 advmss 1460 205.158.62.141 from 192.168.1.51 via 203.88.135.205 dev eth2 src 192.168.1.242...

...for a one time config you could uncomment # the two lines below #echo 206 easynews1.out >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables #echo 207 easynews2.out >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables ip rule add fwmark 1 table easynews1.out ip rule add fwmark 2 table easynews2.out ip route add $EASYNEWS via $GWE1 dev $IFE1 table easynews1.out ip route add $EASYNEWS via $GWE2 dev $IFE2 table easynews2.out For my full script you can look here: http://www.burnpc.com/website.nsf/all/FE5F4F294F508EB786256E600019BC30 HTH, -Ron

+---------------+ +----+ ISP A | | | |-----------------| | +----+ | | +------+ | ROUTER | NET C | www | | LINUX |----------------| |

Hello Im having a problem similar to sawar Here is my configuration --------------eth1---192.168.1.128---------- -------------192.168.1.1 ISP router 1 | my | ---Eth0---192.168.10.157----| | | linux |

...h programm was giving error messages, while the one I use was applying > without any error messages. Stick with "routes-*.diff" because it is not enough to apply 05_nf* patch, there are two diffs to apply before it. > 2- Should I use : > > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o IFE1 -s NWI/NMI -j SNAT --to IPE1 > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o IFE2 -s NWI/NMI -j SNAT --to IPE2 > > instead of : > > iptables --table nat --append POSTROUTING --out-interface eth1 -j MASQUERADE -j MASQUERADE works for dynamic IPs and is recommended for complex routing situations...