search for: identitiy

...p { ? mail_plugins = quota imap_quota } plugin { ? quota = maildir:User quota } dovecot-ldap.conf.ext: root at mail1t dovecot]# cat dovecot-ldap.conf.ext #hosts = 192.168.122.30:636 # Windows Active Directory uris = ldaps://192.168.122.30:636 #dn = CN=DovecotAdministrator,OU=ServiceAccounts,OU=Identitiy,DC=test,DC=loc dn = CN=Administrator,CN=Users,DC=test,DC=loc dnpass = Test123! tls = no # Ben?tige ich (!) nicht auth_bind = yes # F?r die Dauer der Authentifizierung bindet sich Dovecot als einloggender Mailuser auth_bind_dn = %u ldap_version = 3 base = OU=Identitiy,DC=domain,DC=local # Meine OU m...

...specific topics of my question deals with NA-values and RDA (R vegan) and an adaptated RDA code due to a specific study design (including a second matrix). I am calculating a RDA for a dependent matrix (different variables for tree performance) and different explanatory variables (species identitiy, diversity, soil data, ground vegetation). I would very much appreciate some help with my txt input file for the vegan function. As for standard RDA's I have different plots (lines, the dependent matrix) and for each plot a value for diversity, soil and vegetation (in columns, the enviro...

...because there is a hardware register there. So, the thinking here is: LLVM cannot exclude the possibility of an object of size 0 existing at any given address. The pointer returned by "GEPi p 0" then would be one-past-the-end of such a 0-sized object. Thus, "GEPi p 0" is the identitiy function for any p, it will not return poison. > Now if that might cause any problems, e.g., if LLVM is able to act on > this fact, depends on various factors including what you do with the > GEP. Your initial problem seemed to be that LLVM "might be able to > deduce dereferencabl...

...Johannes, >> So, the thinking here is: LLVM cannot exclude the possibility of an >> object of size 0 existing at any given address. The pointer returned >> by "GEPi p 0" then would be one-past-the-end of such a 0-sized object. >> Thus, "GEPi p 0" is the identitiy function for any p, it will not >> return poison. > > I don't see the problem. The behavior I hope we want and implement is: > > Either LLVM knows that %p points to an invalid address (=non-object) or > it doesn't. If it does, %p and all GEPs on it yield poison. If it...

Hi Bruce, On 25.02.19 13:10, Bruce Hoult wrote: > LLVM has no idea whether the address computed by GEP is actually > within a legal object. The "inbounds" keyword is just you, the > programmer, promising LLVM that you know it's ok and that you don't > care what happens if it is actually out of bounds. > >